Hi,
I'm working on putting together an AR-15, and was going to be using a RRA A4 Varmint 24" upper. It will be used for punching paper and hitting gongs out to about 300 yards, which is the furthest I can shoot anywhere near me. Is there any reason I shouldn't pick up the Nikon M-223 3-12x42SF with the BDC Reticle if I can get it with Nikon's M-223 mount for $438 shipped? Also, if I get the BDC Reticle instead of the M223 with Nikoplex and the Rapid Action Turret, I will still have the option of just dopeing the target with the 1/4 moa elevation adjustment instead of the marks on the reticle, right?
Thanks.
I'm working on putting together an AR-15, and was going to be using a RRA A4 Varmint 24" upper. It will be used for punching paper and hitting gongs out to about 300 yards, which is the furthest I can shoot anywhere near me. Is there any reason I shouldn't pick up the Nikon M-223 3-12x42SF with the BDC Reticle if I can get it with Nikon's M-223 mount for $438 shipped? Also, if I get the BDC Reticle instead of the M223 with Nikoplex and the Rapid Action Turret, I will still have the option of just dopeing the target with the 1/4 moa elevation adjustment instead of the marks on the reticle, right?
Thanks.