SleazyRider
Member
My morning newspaper featured an article about a police officer who dodged gunfire and stopped an armed holdup in a salon where she was getting her hair done. For her extreme calm under duress and incredible marksmanship, she was promoted to detective yesterday in a ceremony attended by Mayor Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Kelly.
Apparently the off-duty police officer was getting her hair done at a salon in Brooklyn, when a a gunman burst in brandishing a .44 magnum revolver, demanding that the four women in the salon surrender their valuables. When the off-duty police officer identified herself, the gunman opened fire. The police officer calmly exchanged fire, shooting the gun out of his hand and then shooting the handle off the door to delay his escape!
Commissioner Kelly praised her "stunning marksmanship" and "steely courage," while the Mayor said she saved lives.
So what do you think? Is this a viable strategy for foiling a robbery? Does it contradict the "shoot to stop" mindset? Will the public expect this movie-like marksmanship from other officers?
Apparently the off-duty police officer was getting her hair done at a salon in Brooklyn, when a a gunman burst in brandishing a .44 magnum revolver, demanding that the four women in the salon surrender their valuables. When the off-duty police officer identified herself, the gunman opened fire. The police officer calmly exchanged fire, shooting the gun out of his hand and then shooting the handle off the door to delay his escape!
Commissioner Kelly praised her "stunning marksmanship" and "steely courage," while the Mayor said she saved lives.
So what do you think? Is this a viable strategy for foiling a robbery? Does it contradict the "shoot to stop" mindset? Will the public expect this movie-like marksmanship from other officers?