Obama says 'enough is enough' after latest deadly shooting

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey bigbore, I've pretty much got all the guns I need now. What Obama is really motivating me to do is stock the crap out of my reloading bench, powder, primers, and components. I'm loading up!

This jerk is determined to cause another panic buying spree where 5.56 ammo disappears for two years!
 
I can see it now...tick off your bosses in the Secret Service and be sent to be on Obama's protection detail when he's 80...their form of Siberia...as if it's probably not bad now
 
Obama said the suspect was armed with an assault weapon and had held hostages at the Planned Parenthood center, from which he opened fire at people outside.

One new article said this individual used a deer rifle and had several guns with him. Updates? Specifics?
 
There was a wreck on the interstate, a drunk illegal took out a family. According to BHO's "logic", the interstate should be shut down and everyone's car should be confiscated.
 
We can modify his statement about the guns to this: We need to restrict the easy access to beer because of all the carnage it causes on the road....enough is enough!

How many lives have to be lost due to easy access to beer?

DUI death's are in the 10's of thousands every year, mass shootings....you're luck to get to 100 death's. What are they complaining about?
I'll vote for it.
 
gspn summarized the horrible indifference shown by Pres. Obama towards the primary threats to our nation.:(

And that doesn't include his vast increase in govt. spending.

A totally detached, academic view of the world never protected citizens from any actual dangers.
The felonies committed (regarding guns) by a few federal agencies known as "Fast And Furious" was not even comprehended by the general US public.
 
I can agree with one part of his statement. "This is not normal" and it isn't, despite the media rhetoric. It's funny, that with every single shooting, this country is further and further divided. Bodies weren't cold yet when the left was screaming Conservative! Christian! Right wing gun nut!

While at the same time, the right started off with Identifies as female, must be queer, must be a liberal! Registered as UAF, that's a fringe British Marxist poltical party, he's a socialist! (Never once giving thought that UAF might be Unaffiliated). Along with cries of This happened at a bank and spread to the clinic, it wasn't the target! I even read one right wing editorial that claimed because he had a dismissed charge of domestic violence and another for being a peeping Tom, as well as animal abuse, he MUST be a liberal.

Turns out, neither side is really correct, but neither side is going to budge or amend their position.

So, while the shooting may not be normal, the overall reaction remains the same, and that has become the norm. Blame religion, blame politics, blame ideology.

Despite "let no crisis go to waste" being a mantra of the left, the right is just as guilty. At least in this case.

Looking to place blame, the new normal.
 
Meanwhile FIVE people were shot within a couple of miles of the White House in 90 minutes.

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Five-Shot-Within-Hour-and-a-Half-in-SE-DC-356456341.html
Five people were shot within the span of an hour and a half in Southeast D.C. Friday night, and one man is now in critical condition.
Three of the victims were shot in related incidents on Alabama Avenue, one in the 2100 block and one in the 2400 block.
Two of the victims were men and one was a woman. One of the men is in critical condition.

There were two other shootings during that limited amount of time:
In the 2200 block of Savannah Street in Southeast, a man was shot. ....
In the 4000 block of 3rd Street in Southeast, a man was also shot. ...
Where is the outrage?
Where is ANY mention of the incident by the Prez?
OH.... this was B on B crime?...... nevermind.
 
I bet he came to CO because of the legal dope.:rolleyes:
It will be interesting to see what brought him to Hartsel, (really wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't the dope) place can't have but a couple dozen who actually live in town. Wonder if he was living out in one of those old camp trailers scattered around on those 40 acre parcels.

I don't have cable but from what I've seen and read so far the MSM has a full press of talking points going including the war on women and blaming the expose videos on PP as well as all the gun control rhetoric..
 
Oh come on folks, Obama attacked Libya, Gaddafi murdered, destabilized the whole Middle East, watched as tens of thousands die from his handiwork, million refugees, saw his Ambassidor murdered while he claimed it was caused by a video, etc....

And he cries for abortionist while drumming up his anti-gun rhetoric.

He will get nowhere with this during an election year. And this time next year he will be heading for the streets.

Deaf
 
If I interpret his statement right....ALL civilians are unfit to own "weapons of war"? Wow!

He doesn't know me, but he plasters me in with all the nutjobs based on his idiotic world view...wow!

If your a responsible individual, what's the problem with an AR?
 
Obama' statements are a perfect illustration of the left's duplicity when it comes to gun control.

In 2013 gun control activists paid by outside interests swarmed the Capitol and swore up and down that if we just passed their "common sense" gun control laws (UBCs and magazine ban) that these sorts of events would never happen.

Now that those laws have been demonstrated to do nothing to protect the public, these idiots have the temerity to grandstand about passing yet more gun control.
 
I can agree with one part of his statement. "This is not normal" and it isn't, despite the media rhetoric. It's funny, that with every single shooting, this country is further and further divided. Bodies weren't cold yet when the left was screaming Conservative! Christian! Right wing gun nut!

While at the same time, the right started off with Identifies as female, must be queer, must be a liberal! Registered as UAF, that's a fringe British Marxist poltical party, he's a socialist! (Never once giving thought that UAF might be Unaffiliated). Along with cries of This happened at a bank and spread to the clinic, it wasn't the target! I even read one right wing editorial that claimed because he had a dismissed charge of domestic violence and another for being a peeping Tom, as well as animal abuse, he MUST be a liberal.

Turns out, neither side is really correct, but neither side is going to budge or amend their position.

So, while the shooting may not be normal, the overall reaction remains the same, and that has become the norm. Blame religion, blame politics, blame ideology.

Despite "let no crisis go to waste" being a mantra of the left, the right is just as guilty. At least in this case.

Looking to place blame, the new normal.


Very well said. While I don't agree with B.O.'s solutions, along with most of the other proposed liberal solutions, at least they are searching for a solution, while many conservatives proclaim that shootings like this are to be expected and accepted, if we want to preserve our 2nd Amendment rights, so no solution is needed. IOWs, shootings like this are a normal part of life, so get over it already. Sorry, I don't agree with that either.
 
While I don't agree with B.O.'s solutions, along with most of the other proposed liberal solutions, at least they are searching for a solution,

No, they're not. They're exploiting tragedy to move an agenda forward. You need to understand that.
 
What is your governor saying?

He may not be able to do anything but states can and are. What is your governor saying?

Governor Rick Scott you mean? The progressives and/in the media hate him so much if he moved to ban all guns in the GunShine State he'd not get credit for a thing.
Obama needs to stick to Global Warming Carbon Sales.:barf:
 
While I don't agree with B.O.'s solutions, along with most of the other proposed liberal solutions, at least they are searching for a solution, while many conservatives proclaim that shootings like this are to be expected and accepted,
I don't know that we should accept anything but when you look at the alternatives someone innocent is going to loose their liberty in the name of security. This is an ultimate recipe for tyranny.
Not trying to play down an obvious tragedy but focusing on spectacular attacks and loss of life when crime, accidents, negligence take many times the toll is not an answer to any of our problems.
Consider how many Americans lost their lives during the time of the PP attack, I suspect there were many.
 
Kingcreek said:
If they can come up with gun control laws that actually do something positive without further infringing on us law abiding gun owners, them maybe I'll consider supporting it. Until then, bugger off.

There are over 22,000 gun control laws in the USA now. None of them work.

So, you'll never have that question to consider.
 
B.H.O., as well as most of the left have no credence as they have proven that they have no desire to actually enforce laws that have already been passed.

Just one more tragedy to exploit.
 
You and a majority will really need to make a conscious decision to abandon your claim to what for many is a sacred right. Then you will have the dissenters to deal with and probably a bad outcome all around.
Even if what many on both sides say would be the only way to achieve safety from guns we still have all the secondary re purposed weapons.
You would also have to make confiscation universal world wide and be subordinate to the UN or some other world org or else guns would still flow through the black market. But then you'd have to deal with those careless or crooked officials in charge of keeping order.
You see, there is really no way to ensure peace and tranquility, no matter how much you give away.
 
If he went after ISIS with the same degree of intolerance we might actually get something done. This will only be another desperate move on his path to self destruction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top