Of course. All kinds of things. But not someone saying they aren't willing to pay as much of THEIR money for something I am selling as I think they should.John, is there anything you do find insulting?
Because it isn't. Look up the definition of insult. A buyer doesn't have scornful abuse or disrespect of a seller just because they want to make a bigger profit on a resale or just because they place a higher value on their money or a lower value on the item for sale than the seller does. They aren't abusing the seller just because they want to pay less than the seller wants to get. The seller still has their property and has not been diminished in any way, nor has the value of the property been reduced. It's just a disagreement about a price, not abuse or scorn or disrespect.How is this not insulting?
None of my posts could be accurately described that way. I've already said straight up that "coercing someone into selling or taking advantage of someone's desperation, is a different thing entirely than a difference of opinion on price.LOL, the thread is turning into an exercise in justification of shady opportunists.
Agree. And I've said, as others have, that he shouldn't say that because it's not true. I was responding to a post by someone other than the OP stating that making a low offer is an insult to the seller. Which it simply is not. Sure, a seller can take offense, but if they do, that's their own choice.So the focus of thread is whether the offer made is 80% of retail and as expressed by many members, offer made obviously is not.