Open Carry Dude Robbed of His Gun.

Status
Not open for further replies.
It could happen just as easily to you, Mr. Concealed Carry.


No it could not! That statement is prima facia nonsense! CCW's are simply NOT going to get their guns taken away from them as often as OC'ers, you see Tex, the guns are CONCEALED and therefore will not be seen as often as open guns. Get it?
 
That's because the majority of felons when interviewed admit they won't mess with a known armed target because they are afraid of getting shot. It's easier for them to steal from unarmed targets and buy guns. And therein lies the problem... the concealed carrier appears to be unarmed.
Criminals know when CCW is easy to acquire in their area and will respond accordingly. They are not fond of the idea of having lots of armed law abiding citizens running loose. In Florida when the CCW law was passed lots of criminals starting going to the airport and following out-of-staters who rented cars.
 
Buck Snort said:
No it could not! That statement is prima facia nonsense! CCW's are simply NOT going to get their guns taken away from them as often as OC'ers

So, then, it should be extremely easy for you to post plenty of examples of Joe Citizen open carrier getting his gun taken away? You would be the first to be able to do so... so why don't you bless us...
 
No it could not! That statement is prima facia nonsense! CCW's are simply NOT going to get their guns taken away from them as often as OC'ers, you see Tex, the guns are CONCEALED and therefore will not be seen as often as open guns. Get it?

Just because a guy gets held up for his wallet, doesn't mean he can't also have his gun taken after the assailant learns of its existence during a patdown or similar. The ONLY difference is that if properly concealed, a stranger can't be targeted specifically for his sidearm. But robbery is a very fluid situation, and it wouldn't be the first time a robber got more than he anticipated from a victim, good or bad.
 
Maybe I'll be the first one down; I don't know. I do know that I've never seen a report of a case where a concealed carrier successfully drew down on a guy with a gun pointed at them (To be fair, cases of anyone doing the same are very rare.)

It's interesting to note that the concealed carry fans are pushing for relaxed standards of what constitutes "concealed." In Texas, at least, CHL holders wanted be able to be free of the fear of printing; to not be prosecuted because someone caught a glimpse of the weapon. Gee, what if the person glimpsing the weapon is a BG looking for a victim? If the BG is prepared to take on an open carrier, what's going to stop him from taking on someone who is going to have to go through extra motions to access their weapon? Cops have all sorts of ways of spotting a concealed carrier; there might be a felon or two who does the same.

My perspective comes from an acquaintance who was held up. Handed the BG his wallet, etc., cooperated and the BG shot him, anyway. Fortunately, the victim survived but he'll never talk right again (he was shot in the throat). The cops never caught the shooter. He didn't have a gun, but he wouldn't have had a chance to pull one from concealment and darn little chance of drawing from an open holster. But, if it comes down to it, if I'm not immediately disabled, I want to be able to return fire and I can do that better from open carry. I don't mind tossing a roll of cash to the BG, as Mas Ayoob recommends, but if violence is the BG's goal, I want to make it expensive; lethal if possible.

The fact is, at least in Texas, the only time you can legally draw and use your weapon is while the threat is clear and present. If the robbery is done and the BG turns and leaves, your right to use lethal force just ended - the threat is no longer present and only a LEO is authorized to use deadly force in pursuit of a lawbreaker. Provoking a response by pulling your weapon and challenging the BG puts you in the wrong, as does shooting him in the back. Doing so also means you lose any immunity to a wrongful death lawsuit.

I want unlicensed open carry to be a legal option; I don't make any demand that it be the only option as I believe the right to keep and bear arms includes the choice of how those arms are borne. Sadly, that seems to put me in opposition to those who see concealed carry as the only choice and the only one that should be allowed.
 
Last edited:
The OC movement is really just getting underway in this country, give it time. It'll only take a couple of well reported instances for the BG's to all get the idea.
 
Texas Bill wrote: "Sadly, that seems to put me in opposition to those who see concealed carry as the only choice and the only one that should be allowed."

I want to state right now, that is not my position. If you want to OC it should be a personal choice.
 
Ah, I think I see the problem now. The fact is that the most virulent opposition to OC is usually from CC'ers, and that's what several of the posters here came off as. However, I'll admit that I read more into it than what some of you likely intended, so I'll apologize for that.
 
With two people, it's twice as easy to detect something's amiss before it happens.

Sometimes. Sometimes not. Depends on the two and what their level of experience is.
Hans Rudel, legendary WW2 Luftwaffe ace said that most of his victims didn't even know that he was in the same sky with them when the end came. I'd venture a guess that very few fighter pilots operate in Condition White whenever they're in the air with even the slightest possibility of enemy contact.

The fact is that the most virulent opposition to OC is usually from CC'ers,

Sadly, that observation is accurate. I think that it often comes from: "I (name the practice) so therefore, that's what you should do." Open carry is a choice. So is concealed carry. Even carrying a gun...or not...is a choice. We can't presume to make choices for others...no matter how well or ill-conceived their choice is. Ain't that America?
 
Maybe someone pointed this out already, that this was a case of armed robbery. The victim's gun wasn't snatched out of his holster, it was taken at gun-point. This is one reason why you need a back-up.

Woody
 
Buck Snort said:
The OC movement is really just getting underway in this country, give it time. It'll only take a couple of well reported instances for the BG's to all get the idea.

Let me see...... where have I heard that one before..... wait, it's coming to me now.... oh yeah, the Brady Campaign said the same thing about concealed carry, that's right.

42 states allow open carry, yet we can come up with ONE armed robbery. Not even a gun grab... an armed robbery.

TexasBill said:
I do know that I've never seen a report of a case where a concealed carrier successfully drew down on a guy with a gun pointed at them (To be fair, cases of anyone doing the same are very rare.)

But there is a case of an open carrier doing so:
http://www.ammoland.com/2009/07/19/gun-owner-saves-lives-in-the-richmond-va-golden-market-shooting/

From the article:
Here are my thoughts from watching that tape:

* Talk about a cold-blooded, fast attack where an innocent was shot without warning! Unbelievable. Situational awareness is really important. Luck doesn’t hurt, either.
* Open carry was an advantage in this case because in the video I saw just how fast the GO managed to draw his gun and begin to return fire. You always hear about how open carry is so bad tactically – you’ll be the first one shot, etc. Oh, yeah? The GO had a HUGE gun in plain sight and he was NOT shot. Who got shot first? An unarmed store owner.

Personally, I don't care if you concealed carry, or don't carry at all. That makes no difference to me. But I believe that people should be presented with clear facts about open carry based on interviews and real life instances instead of stubborn ideas locked into the recesses of a closed mind that always has to be right, despite real-world examples to the contrary.

And, another real-world example:
http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-in-atlanta/open-carry-deters-armed-robbery-kennesaw

Not trying to convince anyone how to carry, just presenting examples.
 
I read over this whole thread and I never saw anyone, and I may have missed it, talk about anything other than a gun. one gentleman did say he could take an attackers gun away and was accused of being Bruce lee. So I will say this. I was taught that if your face to face with a guy who has a gun in your face the worst thing(generally speaking) is to go for your gun, especially if it's OC and he knows you have it, but either way. I was taught in my ccw class and elsewhere the techniques required to disarm an attacker. my wife is 5.5 130 soaking wet and I guarantee she could snatch a gun out of about anyone of your hands. and I know I could. now I don't think I'm bruce lee or jackie chan or any of those things.. however I have practice, and practiced this technique just in case someone has a gun to my head and my gun becomes irrelevant. There are some very simple skills that I think everyone should know that go along with ccw/oc. simple physics and your hands placed in the right position with deflect the gun from firing your direction and break the grip on it, also it nearly removes the trigger finger.. again I don't believe I'm a ninja so snarky people can keep those comment to themselves. real tactics real practice and carrying a weapon will make you much LESS of a victim in these circumstances.

and as far as OC vs CC some criminals will be deterred some will not.. no one can sit here and decide what one criminal will rationalize in his head. we all make the decision that we think is logical
 
one gentleman did say he could take an attackers gun away and was accused of being Bruce lee.
Reading comprehension is your friend...


Action/reaction time can be taken advantage of in a disarming attempt, however you're still betting on your assailant's reaction time being worse than your action time. So unless you're Bruce Lee fast, you can't guarantee you will disarm your assailant before he gets a shot off.
 
Action/reaction time can be taken advantage of in a disarming attempt, however you're still betting on your assailant's reaction time being worse than your action time. So unless you're Bruce Lee fast, you can't guarantee you will disarm your assailant before he gets a shot off.

I agree %100 but in the situation that a gun is in your face, I think it is a good technique to have mastered and again I'm not arrogent I'm confident I have mastered it. and as a general rule I doubt that most hoodlums spend as much time practicing avoiding being disarmed as I do disarming.. I wanna be clear cause I really don't want to start an argument that I'm steven siegal. I just would like to make the point that along with carrying there are more tools to add to your arsenal
 
I agree %100 but in the situation that a gun is in your face, I think it is a good technique to have mastered and again I'm not arrogent I'm confident I have mastered it. and as a general rule I doubt that most hoodlums spend as much time practicing avoiding being disarmed as I do disarming..

I understand your point, and completely agree that most thugs are not highly trained nor particularly stealthy. But in my previous Bruce Lee comment, we weren't talking about the "typical" criminal.
 
Yep, it must be an oldy. I doubt that you will find anyone in Wisconsin in short sleeve shirts today. I doubt that it makes much difference whether you wear you gun in or out of your pants if someone 'gets the drop on you.' Carrying open does display that you have something worth stealing, so I can certainly see an additional reason for concealed carry.
 
Laf'n'Larry said:
Carrying open does display that you have something worth stealing, so I can certainly see an additional reason for concealed carry.

And it could also be stated with equal validity that carrying open does display that you have something to kill your attacker with, so I can certainly see an additional reason for open carry, since the majority of felons interviewed said they were more afraid of getting shot than getting caught.
 
Detterence or not?

When I was going to junior college many moons ago, I paid my way by working as an armed guard at a convenience store in a bad part of town. I was in there with a .357 magnum in plain site on my hip.

There were several other similar stores with a few miles of the store I worked in. It was not uncommon to hear of one of the other stores being robbed at gun point. The store I was stationed at was never robbed since they had posted an armed guard.

Was seeing someone with a gun on his belt the reason? Was it luck?
 
Hans Rudel, legendary WW2 Luftwaffe ace said that most of his victims didn't even know that he was in the same sky with them

Hans Rudel was a legendary STUKA pilot and unreconstructed Nazi. Most of his victims were on the ground. Although credited with nine air-to-air victories, he was technically not an ace because the Germans required ten kills for that status. Perhaps you were thinking of top scoring ace Erich Hartmann?
 
I think that the decision of where you carry is a personal one. I concealed carry daily, they are still trying to figure out if we have open carry laws on the books city by city. It's a mess right now and I think I'll back off of open carry till they sort it all out.

Let me just say that maintaining situational awareness, is easily the most important thing you can do to protect yourself. So now that we've agreed on that, we come full cycle back to it's a personal decision where and how to carry a firearm. And concealed carry folks, don't think for even a moment that we can't spot CCW firearms. Once you have tried a number of different setups and rigs they are as easy for me to spot as open carry.
 
:what: did you see that nik guy!!!!! i never though i would say this but he dosent need a gun!!!!! he looks like he could tear a man in half!
 
I'm going to agree with Navy LT, and some others.

There are ups and downs to both. Be advised on the differences, and what suits you. But also think about contingencies. A knife. An asp. A flashlight. Your <significant other> also carrying and have some practice backing each other up. Hand to hand courses. Train a little, on something other than your trigger finger. That's my opinion. Yes, I have some hand to hand training. I carry all kids of things that can be used as weapons. I've taught my wife and kids some hand to hand stuff too. And for all the people talking about the getting the drop on people scenarios, spend time going places with your friends. In this digitally connected age, get some old fashioned time with your friends. It is more precious than we realize. (I prefer my backup gun to be in my backup person's holster. Way better than an ankle holster if you ask me.)

Please bear in mind that the wall of text that follows is a personal thing for me, but I would like to give you some insight into how I look at the people around me that I don't know and why. I feel it is relevant to the discussion, but if you want to comment on it in depth, please send me a PM. I am not going to discuss large portions of the following in an open thread.

I'm going to add a small perspective that I normally don't ever entertain, but I think that this is fairly relevant to this discussion. This part gets a little long, so bear with me. It might highlight some of the discussion points that have come up. From the other side of the discussion.

I hung around with some bad characters before I became an adult. I didn't get involved with the things that some of my acquaintances did that have landed them in prison, but I watched the drama in real-time. Some of you talk about bad guys, even from a LEO perspective, but I don't think a lot of you actually know any bad guys. I do, or rather did. There is a point to this. I'm not trying to stir the pot here (mods), or offend anyone. I'm not proud of what I'm about to relate, and I have never discussed this with other than a few close friends.

I've been in the back seat of a car when someone tossed me a .380 that he had gotten in a drug trade and they (the two guys in the front seat) were talking about what some good places to rob were going to be. I had the disturbing notion that I was either going to be forced into a) being in the car when it went down b) being forced to be the driver or c) have to risk my own life trying to stop the morons from killing some old lady for her purse. For the record, I was only in the car for a ride home from a church social and they offered me a ride home because my buddy I had ridden with had hooked with a cute girl and was bringing her home. Bad situation, right? I was 15. One guy was 17, his dad was a cop. The other guy was 18, had me by about 6 inches and about 70 pounds. So, I did the only thing I could think of. I pulled the floor plate out of the magazine and acted all stupid. The worst I was going to get at that point was an ass beating. They robbed the poor box at a (different) church that night with an unloaded gun. Did that save the priest from getting shot? Who knows. I do know that they couldn't get the magazine repaired, and that I didn't have to worry about getting my ass beat over it because they got caught. Bringing the poor box back, btw. Criminals are wily bastards, but often prove themselves to not be all that smart. Not much different than the rest of the population.

Those two were in and out of concrete rooms, but last I heard, they had become decent citizens. With records, but decent citizens with a lot of regret for the dumb things they had done.

Another guy, who I had known from the time that I was about 5 years old (we went to church together), was a walking time bomb. I think I always knew that he was bad. Not in the over-awing awesome sense. He was mentally unstable from a very early age. Violent, vicious, and with a propensity for drug abuse. While I wasn't friends with him, we had some mutual friends. And I grew up in a small town, it's hard not to know just about everyone.

He ran away from home, lived for a few months with a friend of his. They made do by breaking and entering, cleaning out houses of small high priced items and fencing them for drugs. They were eventually caught, and while fleeing police in a stolen car, they totaled the car. But, they were juveniles, so they pretty much walked. The other guy cleaned up (for the most part), but the second guy never did.

One day, I ended up talking to him. We were about 17 at the time. He fell further and further into drug abuse. He didn't use a gun early on. He didn't need to. He carried a pretty big folding knife, but never used it in a crime because he clearly knew the difference in the penalties between armed robbery and assault and battery. He was so insanely vicious and insane (second insane added on purpose) that he would assault two or three guys at once, rob them, and be gone. Daylight, alleys at night, whatever. He was high as a kite while we were having this discussion, and he went into a dissertation on how he selected his targets. This is the part that I want you to think about.

He could tell you to within $25 dollars or so what the entire cost of your outfit was. Shoes, pants, belt, shirt, jacket, ballcap, pagers, and the bulge of the wallet in a guys pocket. He knew where most people carried weapons, scoped them for any trace that they were armed. It didn't matter if you were a man, a woman, a teenager, a senior citizen. He would then assess what he thought of their awareness. If he made them for a potential target, he would get set to move.

He would let them go into a store, the ATM, whatever from his car. If they went in, he would get into a position that he could ambush them. He found it amusing that most people would just give up their stuff with no fight. Sometimes, he would even take articles of their clothing. Shoes, jacket, hat, sunglasses, whatever.

Later (this is after I left for the military and is second-hand), I found out that he had lost what little remained of his sanity to cocaine. He moved up to armed robbery because the little robbings didn't pay enough, fast enough, to support his habit. Where before he would only assault if you resisted, he just went straight to assault. He was hitting people left and right, even in broad daylight. He also went to softer targets. Like old people leaving pharmacies. Eventually, he got id'd by an old lady that he beat up at an ATM and somehow got out on good behavior early, and is now back in on a parole violation.

A lot of people have the misconception that criminals have some sort of game plan, fear of consequences. Some do. Some are just outright insane. As much as you train, there is always the possibility that you are going to be outmatched by insanity. You can't train for that. And don't make the assumption that you would spot him in a crowd. Wily. I knew the guy and there were times that I saw him that I couldn't see the crazy that I knew was there.

Guys, that was over 15 years ago, in a small city. Not Chicago or anything like that.

He was the guy that is your worst nightmare. Nondescript. About 5'8", 160-180 pounds. Physically capable of beating two or three guys at once in hand to hand fighting, able to keep going with stab wounds, broken bones, pepper sprayed, etc. And completely insane. You have to think logically. You have to weigh the pros and cons of whether to draw, whether to use lethal force. There are some crazy people out there who don't think in our universe at all. As far as I know, the only thing that ever stopped him was his intended victim getting a good look at him. He wasn't scared of the crimes or the penalty because he was rather confident in his ability to hit you so fast that you would never know what happened.

There are pros and cons to open vs. concealed carry. Think about this one. At first, with the same criminal, the visible presence of a weapon (including spotting a concealed carry) was a deterrent. Later, he was coming regardless. The only thing that gave him pause was people noticing him.

Spending time debating whether open or concealed carry is a personal choice, and varies based on the situation. Keeping awareness of that situation is always the trump card. Presenting yourself as a hard aware target will probably do as much as anything else.
 
Perhaps you were thinking of top scoring ace Erich Hartmann?

I think you're right. Rudel was a tank killer. Sorry for the cranial poot. It was late...

It looks like the camps are divided. Some are of the thought:

"No way anybody can take my gun from me!"

Some are on the opposite end that say:

"Don't kid yourself. Somewhere, there is somebody who can take it and will...for no other reason than the fact that it's there...if they see it if they get the opportunity. You just haven't met him yet."

I'm firmly entrenched in the second camp.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top