Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Opinions on a S&W 637

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by 88 Cutlass, Dec 3, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 88 Cutlass

    88 Cutlass Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Messages:
    28
    Hey guys I'm thinking about purchasing some type of snub nose revolver for carrying after santa brings me some christmas money. I've always been a fan of S&W revolvers. My grandfather got me started when he gave me a 1982 Model 19-6. I've been doing some research and been hearing mixed feelings about newer S&W quality. I really like the 637 because of the da/sa ability and I don't think a revolver looks right without a hammer. Right now I carry either a Glock 26 or an LCP. I'm assuming the 637 would fall right inbetween those on ease to carry. How do most people carry snub nose revolvers? Any insite would be great or if you have any other recommendations as well.

    Thanks Tim
     
  2. gtmtnbiker98

    gtmtnbiker98 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    320
    The 637 is an awesome J-frame. I own both the 637 and 642 and carry them in a Nemesis pocket holster. They disappear. Without hesitation, buy with confidence!
     
  3. chrome_austex

    chrome_austex Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2008
    Messages:
    496
    its suprising how well a 637 (I've got a 638) conceals in a pocket. The gun is only like 1/2 inch thick except for the cylinder and grips, both of which are not very boxy and so don't print much through loose or thick clothing.

    I carry either in an inside coat pocket, or in front pants pocket with a pocket holster. The pocket holster (Basically just a leather sleeve helps the gun not print even with tight fitting pants.

    The 638 I feel has the best of both worlds (well shrouded hammer, which is still usable), even if its a bit of an ugly duckling.

    Although they kick like a mule, I'm very accurate with mine, esp after installing some slightly lighter springs.
     
  4. 88 Cutlass

    88 Cutlass Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Messages:
    28
    Thanks for the replys guy. The 638 is on my list to consider I just can't get over not having a hammer to pull yet. I use a desantis pocket holster now for my LCP and like it. I just went over to the gun shop on lunch and tried the 637 in my front pocket and it didn't seem to bad.

    chrome, I'm unaware of the springs your talking about. I've never really had a revolver apart. Is it something as simple as changing a recoil spring on a semi-auto?
     
  5. jon86

    jon86 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2010
    Messages:
    812
    I used to have a 637, now I have a 638. Both are great guns. I like pocket carrying mine, that is the only reason I got the 638. You can't go wrong with either.
     
  6. Gary A

    Gary A Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,474
    I don't have a 637 but have a couple of examples of the 37-2 and absolutely would not be without one. Mine are bobbed hammer versions but I would like them equally if they had spur hammers.
     
  7. sigbear

    sigbear Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    221
    Why Not LCR?

    I had a 637 years ago and it was a good gun, however, I now have a LCR and like it much better because of the smoother trigger, trigger guard and is a better shooter (IMO).

    The 637 is a much better looking gun though. LCR is fugly

    Sigbear
     
  8. Ala Dan

    Ala Dan Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,879
    Location:
    Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
    I would rather have an older, Smith model 37; but there is nothing wrong
    with a S&W 637, as they seem to have "the orange peeling issues*" all
    straightened out.

    *FootNote: found on early production 637's~!~:eek:
     
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2010
  9. gbball98

    gbball98 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2010
    Messages:
    55
    Location:
    Kentucky
    I have a 637, they are great little guns and work great with a pocket holster.
     

    Attached Files:

  10. jon86

    jon86 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2010
    Messages:
    812
    Wow gbball98, those grips look fantastic!
     
  11. gbball98

    gbball98 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2010
    Messages:
    55
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Thanks jon86, those are Jay Scott's I bought off ebay.
     
  12. chrome_austex

    chrome_austex Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2008
    Messages:
    496
    Re: springs... checkout Wolff springs www.gunsprings.com. I had a tough time doing a spring job myself, but I *love* the results. The internals are pretty compact and delicate, but its doable. We're talking about the hammer spring (aka mainspring) and the rebound spring (returns the trigger after the pull), I believe both are compressed when you pull the trigger.

    Obviously, you want to be careful what you choose for a defensive carry gun, since the factory springs are stiff for a reason. I was going for something light enough that I could pull it relatively smoothly, but nothing like you'd find on a competition gun.
     
  13. btg3

    btg3 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    1,921
    I've bought a couple of 642's from shooters who said they didn't like them. I think they're great and shooting with +p ammo is not uncomfortable. You may want to consider trying one (range rental?) before committing to a purchase.
     
  14. ulflyer

    ulflyer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,349
    Location:
    NC
    Chrome: what LB hammer spring did you use? According to Wolff, the standard is 18 and he offers all weights down to 11lb.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page