pellet-gun-wielding robber flunks victim selection

Status
Not open for further replies.

ThatIsAFact

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2004
Messages
44
The robber described below, Riccardo Crossland, who used a pellet gun to rob a man who was walking a pit bull (the victim also turned out to be a nonresident permit holder with a .45), would be a good candidate for the Darwin Award, except that Mr. Crossland survived the encounter.

Man with concealed weapon shoots alleged robber
By Bill Bryan

[email protected] | 314-340-8950
ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
03/14/2007

Riccardo Crossland used a pellet gun to rob a man legally carrying a real gun outside a Bridgeton motel Tuesday morning and ended up shot, police said.

Crossland went off to a hospital with wounds of the hand and leg; the victim went on his way with the congratulations of police. "Here was a robbery where we have a good ending for once," said Bridgeton Police Major Don Steinman, who said the shooting was clearly self-defense.

The 23-year-old victim holds a concealed-carry permit from his home state of Florida, which is honored in Missouri, officials said. Advertisement

"He had his gun aimed at my face," the robbery victim said in an interview granted on the condition that his name and hometown not be used. "I definitely thought he was going to shoot me, so I started firing."

Crossland's weapon turned out to be a pellet gun that resembled a .45-caliber handgun, police said. The victim had a real .45 in his waistband.

Crossland, 39, of the 7100 block of Beulah Avenue in Jennings, was taken to DePaul Health Center, police said, for treatment of his wounds, which were not considered life-threatening. He was charged with first-degree robbery and armed criminal action.

Police said Crossland is on probation for a drug-related offense, and has convictions for robbery, burglary, stealing and drug-related crimes.

The victim gave this account: He had stayed several days at the Motel 6, near Interstate 270 and St. Charles Rock Road, while looking at a race car engine to buy from a man in St. Louis. About 3 a.m. Tuesday, he took his pit bull on an errand for food. Just outside the motel, he encountered two men who asked questions about the dog before one of them pulled out what looked like a gun and announced a holdup.

"The one guy started to pat me down, and I didn't want him to find my gun, so I was handing them over everything I could," the victim said. "I was just waiting for the right opportunity to get my gun."

The robbers then started to depart with the man's wallet, necklace, ring and cash.

"The guy with the gun was walking away with the gun at his side, but then he turned around and aimed it at my face," the victim said. "I definitely thought he was going to shoot me, so I pulled my gun out and started firing." He fired seven shots and the pair fled. Crossland was found about a quarter of a mile away, hiding on a parking lot in the 12900 block of St. Charles Rock Road, police said. The accomplice was not caught.

The victim said he had the concealed-carry permit for two years but had never used the weapon. Missouri has no tracking system for cases in which people with concealed-carry permits use their weapons.

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/ne...C8F7B714E662ECD68625729E000FA62B?OpenDocument
 
Hmm. No statement from the police saying that people should generally be good little victims and not defend themselves? Interesting.
 
And they used the word "victim" correctly for once.

Yay!
 
+1 to the person who wrote the story. The would be robber is not referred to a gunshot "victim" at all. The only mention of victim is the real victim.

ETA: I sent an email to him about writing a great article. I suggest some of you do the same. Maybe we can change the way reporters think 1 at a time.
 
Trying to think of the best way to put this...

While I would still unconditionally support the man if he had just shot them the first time they showed steel, I feel that by having complied with the robbers, and only having shot them when even after having gotten everything they wanted from him, they threatened him with death, he has given some amazing PR to our side, on several levels.

One, obviously, is the debunking of the theory that just complying will leave you unharmed.

Two, he demonstrated the not all us CCW types are crazy "shoot first ask questions later" people.

I'm sure there are others, but that's all I can think of right now. All in all, it was basically a model CCW interaction, from a PR perspective.
 
+1 on the police response to the event! It'd never go that smoothly in my state, I'm sure.
 
Dimensio:


Hmm. No statement from the police saying that people should generally be good little victims and not defend themselves? Interesting.

Though this from is a St Louis newspaper, the City of St Louis Police Department was not involved. It's our city police department who are anti selfl-defense.
 
For some reason I can't help but think of National Lampoon's Vacation.

That's not a real gun, is it Clark?

Are you kidding? This is a Magnum P.I.

It's a BB gun!



It seems like it worked out almost the best possible way. The crook paid for his crime and possibly learned his lesson. The victim doesn't have to live with having killed someone but still made a very good example of why to be armed and have the right mindset.
 
Crossland, 39, of the 7100 block of Beulah Avenue in Jennings, was taken to DePaul Health Center, police said, for treatment of his wounds, which were not considered life-threatening.

I’m not buying that story. Shot multiple times at point-blank range with a .45 and he lived? If the dum-dums didn’t kill him, surely the tumbling down the sidewalk after being blown off his feet would have.
:p
 
Yeah - should have used some of those Black Talon armor piercing cop-killers I learned about the other day on Dallas Swat. The same show where they raided the wrong side of a duplex that only had women and children in it, where they lost track of a 5-year old as well...

Sorry, didn't mean to thread drift.
 
Hmmmm.....

Well, maybe Mr. Crossland will earn an "Honorable Mention" from Darwin for at least attempting to 'chlorinate the gene pool'.....:D
 
Nice to see that sometimes news gets written the correct way using victim correctly. I do love the fact that the suspect was dumb enough to rob a man WALKING A PITBULL, I am sure there was a more availible target. Guy does need more range time but he did the job either way.

Was anybody else worried about the fact he handed over his keys,wallet ect first?
 
The crook paid for his crime and possibly learned his lesson.
----------------------------------------------
Huh? I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic, if so, fine, if not-YOU GOTTA BE KIDDING!!

Police said Crossland is on probation for a drug-related offense, and has convictions for robbery, burglary, stealing and drug-related crimes.
------------------------------------------------
If he did'nt learn from his past actions (remember, he's only been prosecuted when he was actually caught, likely got away with similar actions) what on earth makes you think this is the "magic bullet" to make him mend his ways?
But there is hope for him (or the rest of us). Anyone dumb enough to rob someone walking a pitbull will without a doubt renew their "license to operate stupidity". With luck, the next victim will aim for center mass. At age 39, and with his past record, a case can easily be made for this guy being a career criminal. :cuss:
 
Was anybody else worried about the fact he handed over his keys,wallet ect first?
Actually, I'm more worried about the part that says one of the criminals patted the victim down!!!

If one guy holds you at gun-point as another pats you down (and you REALLY don't want them taking your gun!!), what do you do??
 
Was anybody else worried about the fact he handed over his keys,wallet ect first?

Acctually, no. This guy did exactly what you are supposed to do in this situation. A wallet and keys are not worth killing somebody over, and I would gladly throw mine away to get out of a shooting situation. However, when the BG turned and raised his gun, he showed every intention of shooting the victim. That was when self defence was justified.
 
I wonder if those here who have questioned the victim's marksmanship have done better themselves in an armed robbery? How many hits for shots expended did you get?
 
Yeah - should have used some of those Black Talon armor piercing cop-killers I learned about the other day on Dallas Swat.

Black Talons in a .45!?!? That would have not only killed the robber, but likely his three closest relatives as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top