Photos of Tac-Sol Pac-Lite Ruger MkIII 22/45

Status
Not open for further replies.
They are great pics. But I used to own a 22/45 Mk III, and I sold it. I personally do not like the plastic grip and trigger housing. It felt flimsy, as if the material was too thin.
 
I think those TacSol uppers are terrific.
I got one in red, fluted, without the rail.
Obviously, it is the one on the bottom.


DSC00807.gif
 
It would be legal whether it attaches to the pistol or not.
The stock pictured above does not attach to the pistol. It fits perfectly along the back of the frame of a Ruger Mk.II. When you grip the pistol, you hold the stock in place. This stock/gun does not require a tax stamp. Since the stock doesn't attach to the pistol, it isn't regulated by the National Firearms Act of 1934.

Here is another one of my collection:

DSC00761.gif

This stock attaches to the SBR in the empty hole at the rear of the magazine well.
This one does require a tax stamp. Actually, in the configuration pictured it requires two stamps because the suppressor requires one also.

Having a shoulder stock on a pistol is specfically allowed under the National Firearms Act of 1934 contrary to a lot of the uninformed misinformation passed around the various on-line gun forums. Again, It is perfectly legal to have a pistol with a shoulder stock.
In my experience, having a shoulder stock on a handgun is basically a waste of time. I can't see that it really does much, if anything, for you.
Here is an excellent reference for anything covered under the NFA: http://www.atf.gov/firearms/nfa/nfa_handbook/index.htm
The fact that something is regulated by the NFA DOES NOT MAKE THAT ITEM ILLEGAL. Everything in the two pictures I posted are 100% perfectly legal.
 
No, that would be an SBR.
Which is perfectly legal and regulated by the National Firearms Act of 1934.
It is 100% legal. It isn't a grey area, or a technicality or anything else. It is just as legal as your watch.
Obviously, if you do it without following the law (as written in the NFA), you are setting yourself up for trouble. BUT the fact that you have to register the weapon as an SBR DOES NOT MAKE IT ILLEGAL TO OWN.
 
Gotcha. I interpreted that as "no stamp required," rather than "allowable as long as registered under the NFA."
 
Enjoy NFA weapons.
Exercise your right to own one.
Don't buy in to all this illegal crap. They arn't illegal. Under Federal Law they have never been illegal in the history of the US.
Give an ATF employee a job. Send them a Form 1. :)
 
Zak, I apologize for the derail, it looks great! I have a MkIII 22/45 that I want to do the very same thing to. I bet yours sounds like a staple gun! :D
 
Ordinarily I wouldn't have hijacked a thread like that, but considering it was posted in March, I figured it was OK>
 
Where can I pick up one of those stocks, as seen lying next to that Mark II?
 
I don't know.
It is cool as hell, I think.
I got it from the guy across the street before he died.
There are no markings on it of any kind.
 
I think that the only thing that keeps me from buying such a product is that, in order for it to be shipped, it has to be shipped to an FFL. I thought it would be like how one does uppers for AR-15s. The uppers are not considered the FFL part. Why are the uppers for these Ruger pistols FFL required?

As for the stock, 444, thanks anyway. Looks like you got lucky. It could be a homemade thing, I suppose. I have never seen anything like that. How well does it work?
 
Yeah, that turned me off from buying a TacSol upper for several years. I saw them when they first came out and thought they were cool as heck.
I am a big fan of the Ruger autoloaders. I have owned one since I was 9 years old and probably have 4-5 of them now. When I saw those uppers I thought, oh wow, I have to get the short one and the long one and the threaded one..................... But when I found out that you had to get them through a dealer it kind of killed the whole thing for me.
What ended up happening for me is that a guy I work with decided to buy a suppressor, so he wanted to get the threaded upper. I told him that I would like to get one but I liked the red color but they only make the threaded versions in black and green. So he called TacSol and they told him they would be happy to make a couple in red, but it would take awhile. If we were willing to wait, they would do it. So, I told him to order me one. Long story short, he did all the leg work and all I had to do was show up when it arrived and pay for it (along with the yellow form, of course).
I shot mine yesterday along with that real long Mk.II in the picture above. The light little TacSol upper is a joy to handle.

As for the stock, I mentioned earlier that I really don't think it does much for you. It is a neat gimmick but that is about it. That Glock I have in the second picture was a complete and total waste of money: and it was a pretty decent amount of money. I got the idea at a gun show. I was looking at Artillary Model Lugers and said to a friend that I was with, wouldn't it be cool if they had a modern day artillary model handgun. He said, they do, a Glock with one of those big stick magazines holds as much ammo as a Luger snail drum magazine. And then you get the stock................. So, the wheels started turning. I registered the Glock 34 as an SBR and bought all that garbage you see in the picture (I already had the AAC Evolution 9 suppressor). That stock is a POS. It flexes when the gun fires. When you are using the stock, the rear sight looks like it is a foot wide because your eye is a lot closer to it than it normally would be. Anyway, long story even longer I consider the whole thing to be a total waste of hard earned money. I put all that stuff on the gun a couple times but 99% of the time I just shoot the Glock with the suppressor which is a GREAT set-up. Runs flawlessly, accurate, and VERY quiet.

Also, FWIW, I realized that putting stocks on handguns was something that they did before the advent of the carbine. Putting a stock on a Luger, or 1911, or whatever isn't anywhere near as good as having a .30 M1 Carbine, which in turn isn't anywhere near as good as having an M4. So, it is an idea whose time has come and gone. Interesting for historical purposes. Kind of cool to try a few times when you are out plinking. But, it doesn't have a practical purpose IMO.
 
Wow, that was a good post, 444. I see your point. Sorry that all the money was spent on the Glock stock when it was basically worthless. However, I've done that before, spending money on something not used much. Lessons learned.

I would like to try my hand (still) at making a stock similar to the one for your Rugers, though. Being unattached, the legal ramifications aren't there, but it could be a fun thing to have at the range.
 
Okay, thanks. I believe the options are 3.5 and 7 MOA.

edit:

is that suppressor a Thunder Beast 22S?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top