Yes, he's the guy. His trigger return spring for the P-64 is made from a thicker gauge of wire than the original, and has one less turn. This gives it a lot more spring force.
No this is completely wrong. The Hungarian PA-63 is a Walther PP clone. The Polish P-64 is a Walther PPK derivative in superficial form and function, only. (You could just as soon call a Beretta 92FS a Walther PPK clone, because it is DA/SA and has a slide-mounted decocker/safety). Anyone who knows the first thing about these guns would never call it a PPK clone, unless their only knowledge comes from the internet. The internal mechanism is completely different. I've taken both of these guns apart down to individual pieces, and I know what I'm talking about. Yes, the manual safety blocks the hammer and the FP. But when the safety is off, there's no passive FP safety, like there is on the Walther PPK and the PA-63... and most all centerfire handguns in current production.The Random P 64 is a clone of a Walter PPK and the Walther is set up the same way and very highly sought after as a CCW. In fact, there were even issued to the NJ State Police as backup weapons at one time. The safety is a roller block that completely remove access to the firing pin hammer strike end. Norm tried to tell you this more than once on the P 64 board also.
Last edited: