wlemay
Member
Ok I know that no new machine guns can be made by individuals and be transferable as of 1986.
I want to know more about this; is this a federal law or a policy made within the ATF.
I personally think that this policy is unconstitutional, unfair, and unreasonable. Due to the fact that requires the average American citizen who is otherwise 100% legal to own firearms to pay an outrageous amount for the very small number of "transferable" machine guns (not to mention the $200 tax, extensive paperwork, finger printing, and other hoops you have to jump through to exercise your right to bear arms (which is apparently not so much a right as a privilege; depending on the "arm")).
I am aware of the NFA act and all that stuff but I want to specifically know more about the origins of the "no new machine guns after 1986" policy: Why, how, and by who (what government entity) it was implemented.
Right now I am under the impression that this was an ATF policy (more of a way to ban machine guns, without having to pass a law that might be challenged in court.)
I want to know more about this; is this a federal law or a policy made within the ATF.
I personally think that this policy is unconstitutional, unfair, and unreasonable. Due to the fact that requires the average American citizen who is otherwise 100% legal to own firearms to pay an outrageous amount for the very small number of "transferable" machine guns (not to mention the $200 tax, extensive paperwork, finger printing, and other hoops you have to jump through to exercise your right to bear arms (which is apparently not so much a right as a privilege; depending on the "arm")).
I am aware of the NFA act and all that stuff but I want to specifically know more about the origins of the "no new machine guns after 1986" policy: Why, how, and by who (what government entity) it was implemented.
Right now I am under the impression that this was an ATF policy (more of a way to ban machine guns, without having to pass a law that might be challenged in court.)