Question for military people

Status
Not open for further replies.
He has claimed that an M16 could hit a guy in the foot and the highly accurate, tumbling bullet, would automatically spin all the way up to the guys head. Clearly, the Army taught him basic shooting skills, but they also taught him a lot of BS.
His Drill Sergeant taught him that little gem.

I've learned to take anything a marine says with a grain of salt(unless I personally know them). I've heard way too many of them stretch the truth.

We were taught NOT to use the sling when shooting because it's a habit that interferes with one's ability to operate the weapon(clear malfunctions, etc.). As far as the distance goes, it's not part of qualification but we do shoot to 500 yards once in a while. We also don't train with optics or anything else like that.
 
tnieto2004 said: P.S Does the training vary greatly amongst branches??

Yes, it most certainly does.


I don't doubt a Marine can hit a man sized target out to 500 yards on the KD (known distance) course. I did it regularly. So do all Marines, or they don't graduate.


Remember though, that's after a week's worth of practice strings. By the time qual day comes around, it's their fifth time shooting the course. And it's at known distances, with range flags to judge the wind value, with consistent ammo and a rifle they know pretty well by that point . . . Because they just spent a week getting to know it well.



I hunted groundhogs for a few years pretty consistently. I'd usually kill three or four dozen a year. Each spring I had to go through that learning curve again, and I'd miss some early on until I got myself back to where I was the past October.

One windy March day I was taking shots at a groundhog across a long field. I use a specialized .308 Winchester Heavy Barrel Varmint rifle just for the job. Handloaded V-max's, Leupold mil-dot Scope, etc. It took me five shots to finally get him. Luck? No. Not luck.

Again, it was a very windy March. I estimated wind gusts up to 30 mph. But I had no range flags, so it was up to me to read the wind value with what I had available in the terrain, all along the way from me to him. And wind values almost always change along the trajectory. I also had no way of accurately knowing the distance. All I could see through my binoculars was his little pig head sticking up - not enough to range by mils accurately enough. So my shots went far - overestimated. So I dialed back and dropped them in, but too far because of the wind gust on that part of the field. A couple more adjustments, just to get the wind bracketed, and the fifth one got him in the teeth. I had estimated the range somewhere between 450-475 yards. When I paced it off, it came out to almost exactly 400 yards.


That summer I bought a laser range finder, and my hits went though the roof. I found I could hit 500 yard range groundhogs in the face and neck regularly, almost never missing. But with summer came less wind, so I had taken out two variables that plague long range shooters - wind values and unknown distances.


It can be done. But,
  • it takes skill to read the conditions.
  • it takes familiarity with the rifle and ammo performance.
  • it requires consistent practice to retain the skill.

I don't doubt those Marines did it. But we often make assumptions as young men that our abilities remain constant over both time and dissimiliar circumstances. They don't. When I was shooting that hog, and missing, I began to doubt myself. But I trusted in my abilities and training, read the hits through the scope, and adjusted.

In Belleau Wood, Marines were involved in fighting Germans in WWI. Reports from the line stated that Marines had engaged the German army out to about 1000 yards away, and were getting consistent hits. German reports recounted their losses from these long range shooting skilled demoralized the men. "We can't even see them yet and they're hitting us with rifle fire."


It is possible. It just might take some refresher time to get back to that level of skill, and tools like rangefinders and range flags help compensate for not being on a KD course.
 
600m is just about doable with an SLR with iron sights or an lsw(the long barrel sa80 if the winds not too bad)
L42 will hit all the time.
get a L96 the accuracy international tight 7.62mm nato head shot groupings at 600m :D
When they were first issued to my unit managed to shoot off against some civi
target shooters and beat them :D the next time the civis came back with hand loads and won convincingly. BUT that was target shooting all the rounds were hitting the bull just theres was a much tighter group :mad:
unless a rifles zeroed long distance shooting going to be fairly random
 
SIR! THE NAME OF MY WEAPON IS UNITED STATES RIFLE 5.56 MILLIMETER, CALIBER M-16!! IT IS A GAS OPERATED, MAGAZINE FED, AIR COOLED, FULLY AUTOMATIC SHOULDER WEAPON SIR!!
SIR! THE NAME OF MY WEAPON IS UNITED STATES RIFLE 7.62 MILLIMETER CALIBER M-14!! IT IS A GAS OPERATED, MAGAZINE FED, AIR COOLED, SEMI-AUTOMATICE SHOULDER WEAPON SIR!! (plus muzzle velocity, chamber pressure, weight, cylic rate of fire, maximun rate of fire, maximum substained rate of fire, nomenclature, etc.)
 
Last edited:
I went through Army basic in March-May 1970 at Ft Leonard Wood. The longest range we shot during training was 300yds. Our qualification consisted of 40 rounds timed fire at targets that popped up randomly and were up for a timed period from a supported position at various ranges out to I believe 250yds; 40 rounds unsupported at shorter ranges (10yds to ?) same drill on the targets; and 20 rounds night fire (I believe 20 yds) using aiming stakes. We used M16's that had been previously issued troops in the field (Viet Nam); in fact, I believe we were told that we were the first cycle at FLW to use the M16.
 
Honestly I think what happens is this. Many other Marines have heard or said the following words "I shoot great at the 500 yard line". Why? Who is it in the pits scoring targets? Other Marines. Now I'm not saying that they cant shoot. Only that sometimes they get hooked up ya know?
That's utter BS. You've obviously never been through Marine boot camp nor earned one of these:

marine_award.gif

There is no "hooking up" and believe me, if a PMI or any other Marine (and they're watching) caught you "hooking up" other Marines, you would highly regret it.

If you don't know us, don't pretend to and then talk smack about us.
 
This is my rifle. There are many like it, but this one is mine. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life. Without me my rifle is useless. Without my rifle, I am useless. I must fire my rifle true. I must shoot straighter than the enemy who is trying to kill me. I must shoot him before he shoots me. I will. My rifle and I know that what counts in war is not the rounds we fire, the noise of our burst, or the smoke we make. We know that it is the hits that count. We will hit.

My rifle is human, even as I am human, because it is my life. Thus, I will learn it as a brother. I will learn its weaknesses, its strengths, its parts, its accessories, its sights and its barrel. I will keep my rifle clean and ready, even as I am clean and ready. We will become part of each other.

Before God I swear this creed. My rifle and I are the defenders of my country. We are the masters of our enemy. We are the saviors of my life.

So be it, until victory is America's and there is no enemy.

Semper Fi

:D
 
Ask him how big the targets are...
I was at MCRD San Diego recently for my son's graduation...
They had a display set up for the parents of the recruits with weapons, equipment, etc...
The long-range targets were roughly 5' square...
I enjoyed belittling The Boy with stories about my Army rifle training back in the Carter administration.
His did shoot "expert" though...
We're proud of him.
P
 
Congratulations! I hear that term (I shot "expert") used quite often .. I am still unsure as to what it consist of .. Or if it a standardized qualification for all branches ..
 
It's different or all branches, but the Marines and the Army have the most extensive training for their recruits however their training is not the same.
 
Personnally I could never hit the broad side of the barn with Mattels 16. But there are some marksmen that were very good with them (far in between). During Nam, the weaponary training was so bad that most of the solders had to be retrain once they were in theather before being sent into combat. On the other hand it is not uncommon to take shots of 600m plus with a M14 or Rem 700 in 7.62x51.
 
I was XO of a Basic Training company at Ft. Knox in the early '80s. There, in ROTC, and at IOBC, I never saw anyone shoot farther than 300m. Other than zero at the 1,000" range, it was all on popup targets, which were almost always in a horrible state of repair.

In ROTC, we were taught to shoot at the GROUND in front of the close-in targets, because the middles were shot out and they replaced them VERY infrequently. If you shot dead center every time, you'd bolo because there was nothing for the bullets to hit and knock the silhouette over. To put it mildly, I despised Basic Rifle Marksmanship practices in the Army when I was in.
 
Shooting is a perishable skill. I get reminded of it every time I look at my past scores and then go out and shoot after not having shot for several months. You won't forget how to shoot; but you certainly do need consistent practice in order to maintain a certain level of skill.
 
Let me give you a run down of how things work, as far as I can remember it, in the Marine Corps. I was in from 92-99.

We qualified for almost an entire week. 200, 300 and 500 yard line fires. Then night time fires at I believe 200 and 300 and then gas mask firing at 100 yards.

First and foremost most Marines are in peak physical shape. That helps immensely when shooting. Also, we spend the better part of a week dry firing at a white 50 gallon drum with targets painted on it from our shooting positions. That makes a big difference too. You're body is used to those positions by the time you get to the range. You might not think it's a big deal, but sit indian style for about 15 minutes with a rifle in your shoulder then get up and try shooting off hand. It hurts.

Then we get to the rifle range. Usually at 0-dark-thirty and you aren't even awake yet really. Then you start shooting at first light.

The first round is zeroing your weapon. That should take half the day for the worst person. Then you spend the rest of the day shooting.

Tuesday is spent shooting pre-qual. You basically run through the motions. The range tower will tell you the recommended windage if necessary.

Wednesday is another pre-qual day. You can take your score from Wednesday if you wish but you'll spend Thursday making new targets and that glue just sucks.

Thursday is qual day. Every round counts. Then that evening, is night fire which is a blast. Then Friday is gas mask shooting with full gear. The fun thing about this is some dummy will leave his deuce gear or LBV or whatever they call it now at the 50 yard line and will leave it there when you move back to the 100 yard line (could be 100 and 200, it's vague) and then you get to shoot holes in his gear!

So there is a lot of prep in shooting quals in the Marines. We're not crawling out of bed out of shape and stiff, then moseying to the range and trying to take 500 yard shots like most civilians will do.

Could I take an M16 right this instant and qualify? Doubtful, if so it will be low Marksman. Give me a week of pre-shoot and a week of practice fire and I'm sure I could qualify Expert just like I used to.

Yep, the targets are pretty big. The white area is 4 foot square. However, at 500 yards the man sized target is dwarfed by the front sight post. And you were scored where you hit on the target. Bull was so many points, next right out was so many points, next ring out was so many points. They changed the way it was scored before I got out but I can't remember for the life of me what the change was. It was significant but I only shot that new system once.

So yeah, these guys that say they qualified expert in the military probably do shoot like crap now. Now their overweight, shaky, their eyes aren't what they used to be, and they're winded walking from the truck to the firing line.

They aren't 19 anymore.
 
From My Files At Fort Benning, GA

My service dates in the U.S. Army ran from late '65 to early '67, and we
qualified with the M-14 (7.62 NATO). 1,000 yard shots with this weapon
were not uncommon. This weapon was one of the best US service rifles
ever invented~! :scrutiny: :cool: ;)
 
Yep.I had no problem firing expert during boot camp in the Navy in March of 2001.....
'course, we were using an extremely light (may have been all plastic/fake, I dont recall)M16, with a laser-tag type do-dad on it at like 25yds, about 10 shots in all 4 positions, with no insturction, and only 1 try to get whatever score you got :rolleyes:.Oh, and the scores didn't count anyways.You couldn't earn your shooting badges in boot camp, and being in the aviation side of the Navy, in my 5 years, no matter how much begging I did, I was NEVER allowed to even TRY to shoot to earn any badges.The people running the range, and my commands were to lazy to bother with us at all.Go Navy!:rolleyes::D

Oh well, thats the other reason we keep some Marines on the ships.:neener:
 
Kalishnikov said
Honestly I think what happens is this. Many other Marines have heard or said the following words "I shoot great at the 500 yard line". Why? Who is it in the pits scoring targets? Other Marines. Now I'm not saying that they cant shoot. Only that sometimes they get hooked up ya know?

Is that how they teach kids to think in public schools these days?
 
Is that how they teach kids to think in public schools these days?

Nature? Nurture? Parents? Schools?

Who the hell knows. But *my* kids don't talk like that, whether they think like that or not!
 
Yep.I had no problem firing expert during boot camp in the Navy in March of 2001.....
'course, we were using an extremely light (may have been all plastic/fake, I dont recall)M16, with a laser-tag type do-dad on it at like 25yds, about 10 shots in all 4 positions, with no insturction, and only 1 try to get whatever score you got .Oh, and the scores didn't count anyways.You couldn't earn your shooting badges in boot camp, and being in the aviation side of the Navy, in my 5 years, no matter how much begging I did, I was NEVER allowed to even TRY to shoot to earn any badges.The people running the range, and my commands were to lazy to bother with us at all.Go Navy!

Oh well, thats the other reason we keep some Marines on the ships.

Some things don't change! When I was in the Navy ('87-'95) I remember much the same thing. Even after becoming a nuc weapons security guy (submarines) I wouldn't exactly call the weapons training much of anything - the torpedomen still did all the cleaning and maintenance, and qual firing was embarrassingly light and only once or twice a year, maybe 30 rounds each time. I was fortunate to have an LPO who was the ship's small arms guy and who would go shooting at a private range with us after hours, using our own weapons and ammo. If it wasn't for him there would have been zero chance of even getting near a target that counted towards the pistol/rifle ribbon.

I hear thesedays if you're hot to get to shoot small arms, get into "force protection". Still likely not to approach the USA/USMC small arms proficiency but at least it's something.
 
When I went through Basic Training at Fort Chaffee, Arkansas, in 1959, we were issued M1 Garands. We shot on the KD range out to 500 yards. If I remember correctly, at 500 yards, the black bull was 18" in diameter, but at the 100/200/300 yard ranges, the bull was a standard 8".

To qualify, we had to shoot on the KD range, 100/200/300 yard targets, and then 500 yards. I don't remember how many rounds. Then we also had to qualify on field pop up targets, plus qualify at night on stationary targets.

That's the way it was in 1959, at Fort Chaffee, Arkansas, BTC.

(BTW, the M1 Garand rifle is a pretty fair battle rifle! :) )

L.W.
 
xsquidgator said:
I hear thesedays if you're hot to get to shoot small arms, get into "force protection". Still likely not to approach the USA/USMC small arms proficiency but at least it's something.

Or become a Corpsman. I'm not sure about other units; but all of the Corpsmen in our Company got to pistol and rifle qual at least once. It wasn't uncommon to see them taking part in various live fire ranges either.
 
Or become a Corpsman. I'm not sure about other units; but all of the Corpsmen in our Company got to pistol and rifle qual at least once. It wasn't uncommon to see them taking part in various live fire ranges either.

What's the saying for the Corpsmen? "Sometimes the best medicine for your patient is 30 rounds fired in the enemy's direction..."
 
as a current Air National Guard Member I am grateful for the Marksmanship training I got in 1985 while at boot camp for the army. in my time in the Air force Reserves and ANG I have been to the range once in the last 15 years.
where we shot frangible ammo at 25 yards. the good news is that range time was in the last year. thank god I shoot my AR's all the time to the tune of 1000 rds a month or I would not feel that comfy if deployed. but My army training is still with me 22 years later. paragon trail FTW
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top