Rediscovering the classic .38

Status
Not open for further replies.

Run&Shoot

Member.
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
664
Location
Oregon
Many years ago I started off in handguns with a 4" GP100 and 2 1/4 " SP101. Then came the custom 4" Redhawk in .44 which got me into handloading. I bought and handloaded only the hottest rounds and loved the recoil (I still do!).

Over time I sold and traded off my revolvers for semi-auto pistols: Glock 21, SIG229, Hi-Power, 1911, SIG245, and recently a Glock 19 and 23. I was getting more interested in "modern" defense arms. Then last year I got a 3" GP100 and later a SW 642. Those were still mostly for ME as the .357 and the Airweight with .38 +P had nappy recoil.

Then this year as both of my daughters began moving out I took them to the range more to specifically work on handgun safety and try to find which pistol they would prefer. The idea was that I would send them off into the world with at least one handgun for personal defense.

I discovered that neither of them were physically comfortable operating the slide of any semi, with the Glock 19 and XD being almost OK, but not suitable for a high stress scenario. This was a big surprise as they are both physically fit and I assumed they woul d be OK with the Hi-Power or G19. I guess I had babied them on previous range sessions by racking the slide for them.

The GP was Ok but the trigger is fairly long and heavy. Single action of course would be very easy. So the first one got that. The second daughter out got the 642 and her new hubby the G19 (thinking they could share both). But this has turned out to be great for hubby but not optimal for my daughter. Back to the drawing board...

I started looking around for a good K or L frame .357. Mostly found 686 with long heavy DA trigger pulls, or more J frames. And then oday I found a used K frame Model 67 for about $325. Smooth, medium weight DA trigger, crisp SA, clean and very tight all around. Found out it seems to be from the late 1970s, early 1980s, sat in the box in a closet of an older gentleman, and saw very little use on the range. I snatchd it up and learned it had been on display for only an hour when I spied it.

I can hardly wait to get to the range and have my wife and someday my daughters try it out. I think every home should have a K frame .38. they are sweet. Not sure if the big difference in the trigger is that this one is likely older than most in the local shop displays, or if the K frames have lighter DA triggers by design or what. But I am ready to start buying these beauties in quantity and handing them out to every new family member I introduce to shooting. They seem ideal for the ladies, and they will make wonderful target shooting guns, and the .38 is still a versatile and effective round for home defense and taking afield camping, etc.

While I still enjoy the full magnums (planning to get a .44 Mountain Gun or similar) and my autos, especially the G23, I am rediscovering what many have known for so long. That is, a 4 inch, mid-size .38 revolver can be a great addition to a shooting FAMILY. what a wonderful way to inroduce someone to the sport and provide them a reasonable defensive arm.

I am a Glock and 1911 fanatic (with a SIG streak). I will rejoin the 642 Club shortly. But I am quickly falling for the Old Time Religion of the Model 10/67. Combat Masterpiece is a well earned title. The .38 rules!! :cool:
 
I love mid-framed 38s. I only have one, a M10-7 w/ pencil barrel, but I'd love to pick up another one with the heavy barrel and have it tuned up as a steel plate gun.

They're just good shootin' guns and the 38special is just a good shootin' round.

Chris
 
K-frame .38's are great. My favorite shooter is a mod 64 police trade-in. My favorite caliber is a .44 mag(can't understand that either!). I keep a .38 for a nite stand gun. If you are a bit recoil sensitive, that Mtn Gun will give you a new horizon. Wow! I regularly shoot a .500 and that Mtn Gun hurts a lot more. .44 spls would be OK though.
kid
 
I agree. I have two K Frames, a 65 and a 66. Too big for pocket carry, just right size for all around use......Essex
 
One of my best shooting revolvers is a old
10-7 with a 3" barrel,best 200 bucks i've
spent in a while.
 
The M67 is the one gun you''' never sell

At least that is what the shop owner said. He had mentioned that it wasn;lt on display long. I says, "Oh, how many days?" Owner says, "One hour! And if I didn;t already have one I would have bought it myself". The other shop guy said the same. Apparently they had all snatched up the M-10 and K-65/67 as they came in until they all had their fill. I had gotten the first one that made it to the display case and then it only lasted one hour. Wow! I went in looking for a G27 and came out with a beauty.

BTW, can any of you help me put an approximate date to the Model 67? It is marked 67-1 and has a pinned firing pin on the hammer. Serial number appears to be 229Kxxx.

It has Hogue grips and a red insert front sight.
 
I've never shot a K frame, but I've shot several L frames. Someday I'll buy a K frame. That buying list just keeps getting bigger:D !
 
K frame, model 19. 38 handloads, all inside 3 inches at 10 yards, double action, without even trying hard.

Bliss. Why do I bother shooting anything else?
 
Yup. My daughter has a M10 3" for a companion piece and picked up a minty M19 about a year ago just because it was so beautiful. My son has a M15 that he thinks highly of.

They always were great guns for the average person and still are. I like Ruger Security Sixes for durabilty but the Ks are a class act in any version.
 
My wife and I shoot this M67 all the time.

IMG_5880.jpg
 
Heck yes... .38 Spl gets the Big Nod from me. Easy to reload, easy to cast bullets for, easy to shoot. Accurate, inexpensive, easy on the recoil. What's not to love?

I shoot a heck of a lot of .38s out of my 4" Security Six, my Model 66, and lately my USFA SAA type.

I love the big bores, of course... but the .38 is bread and butter. :)
 
The good old .38 makes sense for every gun owner if for no other reason than the simple economics of the thing.

You have to go to rimfire to beat the price of ammo.

I bought a SAA in .38 simply to have something to shoot the cheap stuff with! :D
 
You can't beat "the ol' policeman's .38 special." Simple, look good, accurate, dependable and easy to use.:)
 
Smith 14s and 15s make for a very enjoyable day at the range. I am slightly partial to the 6" model 14, for the longer sight radius.
 
I have an old 15-3 that is quite simply the best shooting gun that I own. I bought it used for $200 and I would not take double or even triple for it. It is a gem. Sweet double action trigger and the recoil is so light that it almost feels like shooting a .22. It must be imbued with the soul of it's previous owner who must have been a great shot, because it shoots way better then I am capable of all of the time. I aim, shoot and the bullet hits where I intended it to go. More then once I have been to the range and watched the amazed expressions of the youngsters around me banging away with their semi autos as I popped of six fast shots double action all touching. I wish I could shoot my Glock like that.
 
Found a 10-5 that looked like it only had a few rounds fired through it. No box, and probably sat in a drawer since the 60s. Passed it by at first. Was thinking, "I've got so many .357s, why would I get a .38?" I finally gave in. So glad I did. It is so dang accurate, it's scary! My brother and I set some clays on a bank 126 yards away. Didn't hit it, but I burried it by hitting all around it. Close enough to have been a head shot. Easy center of mass. I love it! Had to get rid of the skinny little square grips. Too small. The gun rotated too easily. Got some Hogue rubber grips, but think I splurge and get some fancy wood grips. I would like to get a trigger job, but I shoot it SA most of the time anyway. Like others have said, best $200 I ever spent. (Actually, $202 with tax, license, dealer prep charges, and delux undercoating.)
 
Thanks for the dating of 1982

That is pretty much what I estimated based on the copyright dates of the printed materials (around 1978/1979).

The only thing I don't like are the Hoque rubber monogrips which fill in behind the trigger and force my hand way lower below the bore axis. It isn't like a .38 needs a lot of cushioning.

The only change I am planning is to put something like Pachmyer Presentation grips on it, simple rubber style. Maybe someday go for some fancy wood grips from Eagle or synthetics from Ajax.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top