420Stainless
Member
The personal decision to carry or not is not what the debate is about. The willingness to give business to a company that takes that freedom of choice away is what the debate is about. Just because one chooses not to exercise a right doesn't mean that right isn't necessary. I have not needed to use my concealed weapon in a bank. I haven't needed to use it anywhere. By that logic, I have no need for the right to CCW and shouldn't care if it is available or not.
Give your money to whoever you want - no justification is required. But the unintended consequence is that more anti-gun business owners will be emboldened to post their establishments as they realize business is not affected. Most gun owners don't care enough to go through the effort of changing their business pattern.
Give your money to whoever you want - no justification is required. But the unintended consequence is that more anti-gun business owners will be emboldened to post their establishments as they realize business is not affected. Most gun owners don't care enough to go through the effort of changing their business pattern.