• You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Remington Model 11 -- Cycling Issues?

Status
Not open for further replies.

HC

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2007
Messages
38
Does the Remington Model 11 have similar cycling issues as the Benelli M1 when not held firmly enough? I've seen this happen on the recoil-operated Benelli, but have no access to a Remington Model 11 to try it out ;) Thanks!

Cheers

HANS
 
No, they shouldn't.
Most Model 11's by now have worn out friction rings and weak recoil springs.
Besides that, they are heavy.
So they have the guns weight itself to push against.
They should cycle just about any way you want to hold them.

My late 60's era Browning A-5 Lite-12 (pretty much the same gun as a Model 11, only lighter) cycles just fine any way you want to hold it too, including shooting from the hip. And it has done so since the day I took it out of the box new.

In fact, it has never ever failed to feed, fire, and function freely, even once, as long as the friction ring setting matched the shells being used.

My feeling is the Browning long-recoil action is much more forgiving then the very short movement inertia action.

rc
 
Thanks! Would this be different for the original guns when they were new, that is, before WWII? I also read there were some internal changes in 1927, but don't know what they actually changed ;)

Cheers

HANS
 
I don't know all that much about Rem Model 11 changes.
They use a slightly different friction ring set-up then the Browning A-5, and early ones may have been short chambered for 2 9/16" shells of the day?

However, nobody ever accused either the Model 11 or the A-5 of being a finicky eater.
The reputation is, they just plain work.
And that has been my experiance with the Browning A-5's at least.
I have never owned a Model 11.

rc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top