kmw1954
Member
The 4.5-14x looks like a good deal.
From the provided pictures of it, looks ideal for a Wisconsin guy:
I had to.
OK buddy send me that link because I cannot find it on their website.
The 4.5-14x looks like a good deal.
From the provided pictures of it, looks ideal for a Wisconsin guy:
I had to.
It's the link you provided, scroll through the pictures- it's the 3rd one if you scroll to the right.OK buddy send me that link because I cannot find it on their website.
I only clicked the link in your post. Do you show a different price?ok not the picture but how did you get that ad with that pricing?
Sometimes significantly better, sometimes not.Then the true question is "Just how much better?" Slightly better, significantly better?
Then the true question is "Just how much better?" Slightly better, significantly better?
I suggest you stop chasing your tail and buy one of the Burris 4.5-14s while you can get them at a reasonable deal. Since the day you started this thread you've already watched them go from being available for about $170 to now costing you $215-$230 or so. Regarding spending more money, I think you would need to spend a LOT more money to get a scope that would serve you enough better that you'd be able to see a difference. As I've outlined several times here, I've compared them carefully to scopes with street prices up to the $500+ range, and IF, IF, any of those other scopes are optically better, it's by a minuscule margin.Surely I wish I was in a position to spend more money but being retired on a fixed income makes one more frugal.
I suggest you stop chasing your tail and buy one of the Burris 4.5-14s while you can get them at a reasonable deal.
As I've outlined several times here, I've compared them carefully to scopes with street prices up to the $500+ range, and IF, IF, any of those other scopes are optically better, it's by a minuscule margin.
Good deal. I hope you'll come back and let us know what you think about it after you've been able to mount it on a gun and use it a bit.So the order has been made for the one I like the most.
Once again, everyone that gave guidance, Thank You.
Good deal. I hope you'll come back and let us know what you think about it after you've been able to mount it on a gun and use it a bit.
A friend of mine bought that exact combo when the first came out, and my opinion matches yours. Course there's gotta be some give getting the electronics in there, working, and the whole thing being affordable. I also found the Crosshairs to be a little thick for my personal preference, but as a hunting optic I think they were fine, and the RF connectivity is actually a more useful system than the built-in function of the Burris, Nikons, or Bushnell scopes.Just added this to my daughter’s Ruger American Compact. Glass is ok, not crystal clear, but I think it should be dead simple for a young shooter. This one is linked by Bluetooth to the range finder and provides a lighted holdover once ballistic info is entered.
View attachment 961208 View attachment 961209
Just got the ff2 I loaned to my FFL buddy back. Traded him a PFI 3-12x42 for it....which seems weird....I traded for my own scope.....Great thread timing for me. New Stag Varminter in 223/556 for long range target. Upgrading from a Nikon p223 3-9x50 because I want more magnification to punch paper beyond 500yards. Based on this thread (and CraigC) I went with the Burris FF2 4-16x42 with the Long Range MOA reticle model 200344. Should be here tomorrow.