Right to a Court-Appointed Attorney

Status
Not open for further replies.

brufener

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Messages
183
An attorney is invaluable if one is accused of a crime. Using a gun in self-defense can result in criminal charges, especially in certain liberal areas. In some of his writings, Massad Ayoob mentions that he has a local criminal defense attorney on retainer in case criminal charges are brought against him. Highlighting the importance of an attorney is the guarantee of right to counsel in criminal proceedings by the 6th Amendment.

I was under the mistaken belief (reinforced by pop culture) that a court will appoint (and pay for) an attorney for any criminal defendant if the defendant does not provide his own attorney. However, in Virginia (and I believe in most states) the state will only pay for an attorney for indigent defendants.

From Virginia Code § 19.2-159(B)(3):

3. Any exceptional expenses of the accused and his family which would, in all probability, prohibit him from being able to secure private counsel. Such items shall include but not be limited to costs for medical care, family support obligations, and child care payments.

The available funds of the accused shall be calculated as the sum of his total income and assets less the exceptional expenses as provided in paragraph 3 above. If the accused does not waive his right to counsel or retain counsel on his own behalf, counsel shall be appointed for the accused if his available funds are equal to or below 125 percent of the federal poverty income guidelines prescribed for the size of the household of the accused by the federal Department of Health and Human Services. The Supreme Court of Virginia shall be responsible for distributing to all courts the annual updates of the federal poverty income guidelines made by the Department.

If the available funds of the accused exceed 125 percent of the federal poverty income guidelines and the accused fails to employ counsel and does not waive his right to counsel, the court may, in exceptional circumstances, and where the ends of justice so require, appoint an attorney to represent the accused. However, in making such appointments, the court shall state in writing its reasons for so doing. The written statement by the court shall be included in the permanent record of the case.

From http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/06poverty.shtml

Poverty line for 1 person is $9,800, 2 is $13,200, 3 is $16,600, 4 is $20,000, etc.

Hence if the accused's family (of four) has an income of more than $25,000 ($20,000 * 1.25) then he must pay for his own attorney.

I don’t know about most of you, but an attorney seems awfully expensive for a family making $25,001/year.

Waiting until you have been accused of a crime is no time to shop around for an attorney. It would be smart to put an attorney on retainer, or at least find out which attorneys are good and what they charge ahead of time.

Hope this is helpful!
 
Hence if the accused's family (of four) has an income of more than $25,000 ($20,000 * 1.25) then he must pay for his own attorney.
No, you misread. It says "available funds," not "income." So, if you don't have $25k in available funds, you qualify.

Or pay El Tejon in guns.:cool:
 
In CA, one can ask for a court appointed attorney during arraignment. If it appears to the court the defendant can afford an attorney, one will still be appointed, but the defendant will fill out a financial disclosure statement. The court will decide after reviewing the financial disclosure if the defendant can afford an attorney.

If in the opinion of the court the defendant can afford an attorney, he will be required to reimburse the court for the appointed attorney's costs.

Pilgrim
 
All I can say about court appointed attorneys is DONT DO IT....If you are charged with a criminal offense, get the most expensive attorney you cant afford it will be cheaper in the long run, that goes for a divorce too!!:D
 
Here in VT they won't give a public pretender if the prosecutor is not asking for time.
 
No, you misread. It says "available funds," not "income." So, if you don't have $25k in available funds, you qualify.

Henry,

You have to read the entire statute, not just the part I bolded. From the preceding sentence (to the one I bolded):

"The available funds of the accused shall be calculated as the sum of his total income and assets less the exceptional expenses."

Available funds as you are using it falls under assets. "Assets shall include all cash on hand as well as in checking and savings accounts, stocks, bonds, certificates of deposit, and tax refunds." VA Code § 19.2-159(B)(2). The defendant's "available funds" includes all assets (cash, savings, checking, stock, etc.) PLUS total income.

Hence if a defendant had no assets, but had a total income of more than $25,000 (still assuming family of 4), then the state will not pay for his attorney.

All I can say about court appointed attorneys is DONT DO IT

Delta,

I have to agree with you there. I have heard some scary stories about court appointed attorneys. My hope is that people will think about who the best attorney is before they are charged (not to imply that anyone here would be charged, but you never know). Although I have never been in jail, trying to find the best attorney from behind bars cannot be easy.
 
Huh, I Used To Think They Would Just Give Me A Lawyer if i asked, didnt know about income and such stipulations now that i think about the Miranda Rights that suck so i have to pay for a lawyer if im fasley accused of a crime that sucks

You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government expense.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_rights
 
"Waive your rights and just tell the judge that you are depending on him (since he is the judge) to insure that you are getting a fair trial and that no appealable mistakes or judgments occur. "

Crop:

Either you are joking or you've had no experience with the legal system whatsoever, as that is the most incredibly bad advice I've ever heard.

Would you go into a gunfight with no ammunition? Equalivant.

Kowboy
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top