Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ruger LC9 vs Kel Tec PF9

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by southernconnection, Jun 5, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. southernconnection

    southernconnection Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2010
    Messages:
    6
    Sure this has been asked before but I am looking for another firearm to carry in the summer. Concealed weapon in pocket. Which would you buy and why?

    Thanks in advance
     
  2. Effigy

    Effigy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2011
    Messages:
    420
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    I'd go with the Kel Tec for these reasons:
    1. Kel Tec creates innovative products and I like supporting companies that do that. Ruger just ripped off Kel Tec's PF9 design to create the LC9.
    2. The PF9 is slightly smaller and lighter. (Not a big difference though.)
    3. The LC9 has annoying and unnecessary features like a manual safety, magazine disconnect safety, loaded chamber indicator, internal lock, engraved safety warnings on the gun (seriously?). The fit and finish is nicer on the LC9, but all this extra garbage Ruger added just gets on my nerves.
     
  3. RX-178

    RX-178 Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,647
    Location:
    Anchorage, Alaska
    +1 Effigy.

    I'd go with the PF-9
     
  4. Effigy

    Effigy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2011
    Messages:
    420
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    While we're on subject, I just want to add a word of caution regarding these small 9mm pistols: know what you're getting into before you buy it. This isn't the type of gun that you'd take out shooting for fun (not often anyway). Your hand will be sore from the recoil after 50 shots or less. I used to think my full size .45 ACP had a lot of recoil, but it's a soft shooter in comparison to the PF9. During my first time out with the PF9 I put 150 rounds through it in one range session, alternating hands every mag or two, and the webs of my hands were achy for about a week.

    I'm not trying to talk you out of getting one since they are very well suited for concealed carry. Just understand the consequences of shooting a service caliber out of a micro-compact gun.
     
  5. 451 Detonics

    451 Detonics Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    2,442
    Location:
    Indiana
    A 22RF conversion is available for the PF-9, makes practice cheap and fun.
     
  6. marksman13

    marksman13 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,428
    Location:
    Mississippi
    I don't find the recoil of my PF9 to be all that unpleasant. Sure, it's substantial, but not painful. I put 250 rounds through mine on the first range trip without any ill effects. I've got about 400 rounds through it now and the only issue I have with the recoil is that follow up shots are more difficult. I'd compare the recoil to a Glock 23, only my pinky hangs off, so I can't grip it as well.

    I like my PF9 and chose it over the LC9, LCP, and P-3AT because of price/caliber. The finish on the Kel-Tec is not very rust resistant and I will probably Dura-coat it this Summer. I've had 2 FTFs in 400 rounds, but both were within the first 15 rounds or so, with no problems since.

    The fit is a bit sloppy (slide wiggles side-to-side on the frame quite a bit). This is annoying, but for $225.00 out the door for a new pistol, I'll be annoyed.

    Hope this helps. Good luck with your choice.
     
  7. RightCoastBiased

    RightCoastBiased Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Messages:
    167
    I shot my LC9 for the first time today. And after 270 rounds, I was not sore. I did not keep switching hands and I had no malfunctions.

    The "safety" features are not ideal. But I don't think they detract from an other wise great pistol. I also carry it all day at work while I am constantly bending, crouching, reaching high shelves and all other sorts of moving. I do all this with no discomfort from the LC9 and this is even in a cheap desantis pro-stealth.

    Overall I really like this pistol and prefer it over the look of the PF9. Though I've never shot the Kel-Tec.
     
  8. elano

    elano Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Messages:
    385
    I would pick the kel tec pf9 becausebit doesnt have any of the safety crap and is lighter Plus what what everyone above said.
     
  9. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,848
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    PF9, for the reasons effigy mentioned, plus past bad experiences with Ruger on the CS end. KT, on the other hand, will replace parts, including the whole gun, forever, no questions asked. They've even sent me free replacements for pieces I LOST.
     
  10. FCastle88

    FCastle88 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    99
    Location:
    PA
    It depends on the gun as well, most people who have shot both the Ruger/Keltec and one of the Kahr models say that the Kahr is much more pleasant to shoot, partly due to the low bore axis. I just took my new CM9 to the range a few days ago and shot 50 rounds of WWB and 30 rounds of 124gr +P Gold Dots. Surprisingly recoil felt pretty much the same as my G26, I didn't experience any soreness or anything.
     
  11. snooperman

    snooperman Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,143
    +2 Effigy.. Ruger copied Keltecs design twice..

    First with the LCP- P3AT and again with LC9-PF9. Gun tests magazine ripped them good for it and gave the "A" rating to the Keltec PF9. I have the PF9 and like it a great deal--very reliable.
     
  12. JustinJ

    JustinJ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    4,046
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Nothing new will be said this time around that wasn't said in the last 100 threads over the last two weeks. All you could ever want to know can be found with the search function.
     
  13. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,848
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    And nothing new was said in your post that hasn't been said ten thousand times whenever someone asks a question, usually by newer members like yourself who have formed some kind of superiority complex.

    This forum has been around a long time, there are 100,000 members. Nothing has not been discussed. But since it is a discussion board, we need discussion to keep it alive. Also, it can be a hassle to sort through pages and pages of archived threads looking for the answer to a specific question.

    If you're annoyed by these threads, don't click on them.
     
  14. crracer_712

    crracer_712 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2011
    Messages:
    439
    Location:
    Kansas
    All saftey 'crap' aside, put them in your handle and fondle them to form your own opinion. If money is a problem, as it is with so many, the Kel-Tec fits the bill. I bought tthe LC9, fit and finish are near flawless on my model (I passed one up before I bought the one I got). It fits MY hand like a glove, I liked the feel of the grip much better than that of the Kel-Tec's squared grip pattern (a personal prefrence). I also liked the trigger gaurd better, more room.

    I like the manual safety (another personal prefrence), its unobtrusive and very easy to aquire with my thumb. I am also one of the few that like the LCI (would I want it on a 1911, no). Shooting it, I never know its there because it isn't in the way of the most excellent sights. I don't really get the hang up with the mag disconnect, I'm not going to be shooting it without a mag in it.

    That little extra trigger lock safety that is activated with the 'key', I'd have to agree that it is over the top. I just leave it off.

    Nearly 500 flawless rounds in my LC9, no a single issue. No random mag drops, no FTE, FTF (either kind).

    I formed my own opinion because it was going to be my gun. I watched a few videos and then put them in my hands.
     
  15. Jbabbler

    Jbabbler Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    807
    Location:
    Atlanta
    roflmao2.gif
     
  16. bayhawk2

    bayhawk2 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    86
    Location:
    S/W Texas
    I can't review the Kel-Tek,but I can the LC9.I carried it
    on a slide belt holster around San Antonio for 2 full days.
    Resturants,the Riverwalk,hotels,attractions,walked miles
    from one place to another in those 2 days.It was hot
    so I wore a golf type shirt and shorts.
    The gun was never a discomfort.There were parts of the
    City that,as in most cities,were probably considered
    higher crime areas.There's something about carrying,that
    makes you feel a lot more comfortable in those areas.
     
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2011
  17. Effigy

    Effigy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2011
    Messages:
    420
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    IMO it's just another point of possible failure. It's easier to hit the mag release by accident on these small guns. With a normal gun, that would mean you have 1 shot before you need to tap-rack-bang to get it working again. With the mag disconnect, you have zero shots even with a loaded chamber. If you're used to doing tap-rack-bang on a failure, you'll lose a perfectly good round from the already somewhat low capacity of the gun. If there were a good reason for mag disconnect safeties to exist I might not be as concerned about it, but there really isn't a valid reason I can think of.

    I agree with you on the other things though. You can ignore most of the extraneous "features" on the Ruger and it should run about the same as a Kel Tec. I still prefer not to have them though.
     
  18. JustinJ

    JustinJ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    4,046
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    "And nothing new was said in your post that hasn't been said ten thousand times whenever someone asks a question,"

    Yes, but my post will actually lead him to the most information.

    "This forum has been around a long time, there are 100,000 members. Nothing has not been discussed. But since it is a discussion board, we need discussion to keep it alive. Also, it can be a hassle to sort through pages and pages of archived threads looking for the answer to a specific question."

    Given that most people knowledgeable on this topic have commented recently and are not gona want to repeat themselves over and over again he will learn more on this specific issue by searching. Revisiting old topics when new data is available or fresh perspectives are available is great but given how many recent threads are directly about this issue that isn't going to happen here. For this topic there is no hassle given the number of threads with PF9 and/or LC9 in the title.
     
  19. crracer_712

    crracer_712 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2011
    Messages:
    439
    Location:
    Kansas
    From what I have seen, the Kel-Tec would save about a hundred bucks. That's just going by gun shows in my area. I say 'about a hundred bucks', my LC9 was 407 after tax, bought a couple months ago. Might be a little cheaper now. Most of the Kel-Tec, were priced under 300
     
  20. Dimis

    Dimis Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,558
    Location:
    Delaware
    i prefer the keltec just for the fact that it doesnt have the magazine safety
    i never like owning a gun that cant be fired without the magazine (and yes i understand the advantages/disadvantages of that style firearm)

    justinj

    the reason you were barked at was that is a common (and to some ignorant) responce to alot of questions on this forum
    it has undertones of "what your too lazy to look on your own" or "pffft if you dont know i aint helpin ya" both attitudes that are not tolerated here

    if i asked a question like "what 1911 is best" there are millions of threads on here to search through
    a good portion of them almost a decade old with antiquated information (since firearms are just like computers and last years model is now obsolete or worse discontinued)
    so a new thread with new answers is almost mandated in these situations
    if the mods/admins find it needed they will combine threads delete threads move threads or whatever is necessary so in the end no one needs to be told to use the search feature we all know its there and we all start threads for whatever reason we deem worthy...
    basically its just plain rude
     
  21. JustinJ

    JustinJ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    4,046
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    "if i asked a question like "what 1911 is best" there are millions of threads on here to search through a good portion of them almost a decade old with antiquated information"

    If a thread about what 1911 is best was active just a few days before your post then i would say the same thing to you. Nothing in my thread was insulting or implied laziness regardless of what you want to read into it. The search function is there for a reason and i believe any board is better served by not rehashing the same topic every other day.

    I'm done discussing this though as i believe derailing threads is a lot worse than recomending to people ways to better gain information.
     
  22. 45Fan

    45Fan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2010
    Messages:
    337
    Location:
    Indiana
    Of the two, I would go for the PF-9 as well, My wife carries one, and has had Zero issues with it. The cosmetics can be overcome by a quick gunkote job, or order it with hard chrome or parkerized finish.

    If you wait another few months, Smith and Wesson might rip off Ruger, and come out with a bodyguard 9, and you could have three choices to consider.
     
  23. crracer_712

    crracer_712 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2011
    Messages:
    439
    Location:
    Kansas
    I hope they do a bit better job with it than they did with the 380. I still want the 380, and from what I am reading, maybe they are getting it right now.
     
  24. Dr_B

    Dr_B member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    822
    Location:
    Pacific Northwest, east of Washington but west of
    I carry the LC9 and it shoots reliably. I like recoil so that part is cool with me. What annoy me constantly are all the safeties. I would rather have seen Ruger make the LC9 just a larger version of the LCP. That said, I would like to try a Kel Tec PF9 side by side with the LC9. If I could find one.
     
  25. bigmike45

    bigmike45 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Messages:
    1,021
    Location:
    Texas
    I have been carrying the PF9 for several years now and though, as said above, its not a "fun to shoot at the range gun" it does shoot to point of aim every time and reliably. I have yet to see the LC9 and though I really love my ruger revolvers, I have never really like their semi-autos. I will stick with what works for me. Good luck to all of you on your choices as well.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page