Zerodefect
member
I would KILL for a slightly up-sized 9mm LCP with real sights and a full function slide stop. (a safety would be great too)
I would buy one in a heartbeat.
Kahr PM9.
It'll have better sights, grip, and trigger as well.
I would KILL for a slightly up-sized 9mm LCP with real sights and a full function slide stop. (a safety would be great too)
I would buy one in a heartbeat.
Quote:
How so? The SR9c has a double-stack magazine, not single-stack like the LCP. LCP stands for "Lightweight Compact Pistol," not necessarily ".380 only pocket pistol." So if Ruger introduced a very small, single-stack 9mm carry pistol similar in size to a Kahr PM9, it would be more than appropriate to include it in the LCP family.
Fixed it for you.
And cost double the price.
Originally Posted by valorius
I would KILL for a slightly up-sized 9mm LCP with real sights and a full function slide stop. (a safety would be great too)
I would buy one in a heartbeat.
No, really it's not once you include size and weight into the issue. The Ruger scores very well in those departments.Yeah, but it's twice the gun!
I don't want a Taurus. And i definitely do not want another Kel Tec. I didn't like the first, last, and only one i had.Taurus PT709 has all of those, including the safety. PF-9 and PM9 have all of that but the safety. What you want is out there; it's just not made by Ruger.
I'll fix it for both of you....."Little Copied Pistol"
What i really want is a modern HK pocket pistol, but they're so LE/M centric in their thinking, it'll never happen.