Since we're talking about these pistols, I want to ask those who were around in the late 80s when these came out, what was the draw to choosing these over other semi auto pistols at the time? Was it solely the price (I read on wikipedia these were $100 less than other semi autos) or was there not much to choose from back then for higher capacity/doublestack semi auto pistols?
It was large and clunky.
It had the PC smell and corporate petulance of Bill Ruger all over it which mattered to a lot of buyers. The *P* series wasn't PC but Bill was VERY PC and it showed in so much of his corporate decision making. His sand-box, his rules so I get it.
People didn't often trust it for over interpretation of failing the Joint Service Pistol tests. An unfair assessment in my opinion.
Many folk did not yet trust Ruger's epic inroads into casting and also alloy frames on full-sized, service grade autos.
Magazines, as was Ruger's wont, were stupidly expensive at the time.
Aftermarket for it was slim to non-existent in mags, holsters, sights and upgrades.
There were a LOT of things in the tide running against the *P* series but cost, reliability, customer service and basic architectural soundness were nowhere to be found on the negative side of the ledger.
As is already hinted at in this thread, these WILL be a significant era-collection gun one day and in fact, we are already at the cusp of that.
Todd.