Ruger SP101: Love it, Hate it, or...?

Do you love the SP101, is it "okay", or do you hate the darn things?

  • 1) Love It

    Votes: 54 46.6%
  • 2) It's Okay

    Votes: 51 44.0%
  • 3) Hate It

    Votes: 11 9.5%

  • Total voters
    116
My 2” .38 SP is a bit heavy for a ccw, but it does shoot well and recoil isn’t a chore when practicing with it.

IMG_1915.jpeg

My 4.2” .327 SP is a nice little trail gun that packs enough to be taken seriously for SD and small game getting. I swapped the grip to a Pachmayr synthetic grip that fits my hands very nicely.

IMG_1899.jpeg
IMG_1900.jpeg
Both have had springs replaced and the trigger return spring channel polished, so the trigger pulls are much better than when they first came home.

Stay safe.
 
Love the SP101. It is the little brother of the GP100, which is my most-favored firearm. With both of these models, the factory grip is a perfect fit, in my hands, as if the designer of those grips had hands identical to mine. After I learned to hold really high, on the back strap, I found recoil to be quite reasonable, even with some stout loads. The first time ‘round, with the SP101, I had not yet learned to hold properly high, and so found Magnum recoil to be too stout. The sad thing is that I also sold or traded a .22 LR SP101 snubby, along with the .357. I wish that I had kept the .22 LR! By 1997, I had learned better, about a high grip, and bought another .357 SP101, which is still with me. When I added another SP101, in about 2002, I stopped the routine carry of an S&W J-snub, because I could carry two SP101 snubs. Then, because I had two spur-less SP101s, I soon added another, with a hammer spur, which would enable better retention in some holsters. Then, in 2006, I bought a 3” SP101, and found that this slightly longer barrel changes the “feel” of the weapon, for improved point-ability.

Two of the above-mentioned snubs were customized by Jack Weigand, given his Tame The Beast package, minus the optional Hybra-porting. He used to perform this service on new, unsold Rugers, which could then be sold as new by FFL dealers. I bought both of mine from Allan Yoast, in Texas. I have carried these Weigand-slicked five-guns much, from ankle to pocket to IWB and OWB, and they show the wear. (Most of the ankle carry was while working police patrol.)

Somewhere along the way, I added a 4” SP101, chambered in .32 H&R. This one could end up being a carry gun, more of the time, as my right hand ages-out of shooting .357 Magnum and .38 Special. The rear sight on this one is only adjustable for windage, unlike the adjustable rear sight presently used by Ruger.

After I retired, in 2018, and until 2022, I accumulated three more SP101 revolvers, two having been ported and customized by Gemini Customs, for the previous owner(s), and one being a stock 3-inch, pre-MIM. I reckon that I now have a lifetime supply, even if I pass some of them to my son and grandsons before I kick the bucket.

I would like to eventually add a 4” SP101, with the newer, better adjustable sights. My aging eyes like a bit more sight radius than we have on the 2.25” and 3” guns.
 
I have a 2 inch and a 3 inch. Like both of them and don't think you'd ever wear one out though I did break the transfer bar once in the 2 inch which Ruger as usual was quick to ship me another one free as usual. Only thing i don't like about them is they are a bit heavy for CCW though with a good holster not to bad.
 
I have dealt with the capacity “problem” by carrying multiple revolvers. In early 2002, when I reluctantly transitioned to a Glock G22 duty pistol, I discontinued my habit of using the same handgun, on and off the clock. Gen3 Glocks did not fit me very well, which contributed to my shooting an SP101 better than the G22. That was 2002, when I added the second spur-less SP101, soon followed by another, with the hammer spur. Instead of carrying a full-sized duty pistol during personal time, I carried two or three SP101 snubs. Some days, my 4” GP100 subbed for one of the snubs, as “primary.”

The 3” SP101 was a nice replacement for a very special revolver that I let get away from me. In the Eighties, I had an S&W Model 60, a stainless J-Frame, with a 3” bull barrel, and a square butt, one of a limited edition. I could shoot that one as accurately as I could a medium-frame revolver, especially when our qual course was set-up to be shot with five rounds between the mandated reloads. I very nearly shot a felon with this one, as he pivoted and tried to draw a huge 5.5” Ruger Redhawk, which he had tucked, holster-less, into his britches. He fumbled his draw, resulting in the Redhawk falling to the pavement. I already had the 3” Model 60 in-hand, so, he was taking a big chance, trying to draw. We learned that this felon had gone to prison as a teenager, for murdering the neighborhood ice cream man, and had just been released, after 30+ years, shortly before I almost shot him. He had been burglarizing vehicles, and was in an area we had staked-out, to catch folks like him. Unlike most car burglars, in the Eighties, he was packing iron. He admitted that he was thinking about committing armed robberies, in the area that we had under surveillance.

Multiple-snub carry was/is not just for ammo capacity, but for accessibility options. I write lefty, but throw righty, and shoot DA revolvers decently well both righty and lefty. Some thugs target their intended victim’s right hands/arms, at the beginning of an attack, so, having a weapon positioned for lefty access has merit.

Another reason for multiple five-shot snubs is the amount of work space that one has, when reloading. There is ample clearance when working with a K/L-Frame, Speed/Security/Service Six, or GP100 cylinder. SP101 and J-Frame revolvers require more care in aligning the speed-loader or other loading device.

To be clear, I am not all-revolver, every day. I use Glocks, too, with some frequency, especially when abusive environments are a factor. We live not far from brackish and salt water, and in this wet, green, humid part of Texas, my own body is producing plenty of salty perspiration, much of the year. Gen4 and Gen5 Glocks fit my hands much better than the Gen3 Glocks I was using 20 years ago.
 
i had a ruger sp101, 2”, 38sp some 8-9 years ago. i bought it used because i love ruger single-action revolvers, so why not get a ruger double- too. after finally finding some grips that rendered its geometry in my hand sorta ok, it locked up at the shooting range after a few loads of plain-jane 158gr ball ammo. i paid a gunsmith to sort it out (it still had a couple of live rounds in the cylinder so couldn’t avail of ruger’s fine and free warranty service) and sold it with disclosure. so put me in the dislike category, sad to say.

all that said, the sp101’s stout build would seem to make it a fine revolver platform for cheaper 9mm, but i won’t go there again. i have blackhawk convertibles for shooting 45acp and 9mm.
 
I guess I'll be the first to say I hate the SP101, it could be a lot better in terms of lower weight and better trigger at the price Ruger asks for them. I know, the lower weight means more recoil, but when you get it in the right caliber like I did in .327 the recoil is fine and the LCR has been out for years and I'm not hearing of timing issues with those in the magnums. Years ago I wondered what the future of the SP101 was going to be when the LCR was just an all around better revolver. I can't imagine many new ones are bought these days when there's plenty of people trading and selling them used for less. Of course that used price will keep going up and up as the price of new ones go up.

Price is always a factor and when someone is asked to pay $650 for one new with the issues the SP has on top of general quality issues Ruger has with their DA revolvers, it's not a risk I'd be willing to take, thus competitive options must be considered. With a trigger as bad as a Taurus, I'd rather buy the Taurus at half the price, heck the 3" 605's are coming with night sights now, far better than the garbage sights the 2 and 3 inch SP's have.

I know, I know "low snag"... whatever. In low light I'd be far quicker to pick up the front sight on the 605 than the SP. My 4 inch Charter is light, if I really wanted a 2 inch .357 I would keep my eye out for and older one, the older models have triggers that are fine out of the box and get better over time.

There are fans of the SP101, IDK what the appeal is for them, I guess a revolver the weight and size of a brick deludes them into a sense of quality or it's because it's the smallest revolver they can find that they can shoot full power .357 thru without too much trouble; my opinion is if I want to shoot full power .357 thru a small revolver I'll but the GP100 2.5 or 3 inch 7 shot model. I'm not in a spot I feel I need to regularly shoot full power .357, so the longevity of a .357 isn't a concern.

Yet, the SP101 is available in more than a .357 and the only caliber it's offered in that I like is the .327 because it's the proper size for the caliber. The GP100 was probably far better, but that's getting big for the caliber and since Ruger didn't make the .327 GP an 8 shot, I passed. Until someone else makes a 4 inch barrel .327 on a similar size frame, the SP101 I have will be the best .327 with a 4 inch, but that will not be the case when an alternative is available.

For a .22 I can't think of a worse platform than the SP and the LCRx I just got I have few to no complaints, it's been perfect so far and without touching one I know the SP101 will be an inferior alternative. In 9mm, I understand wanting more weight to resolve crimp jumping, but feel there are better options.

I think that's the bottom line with the SP101 as a whole: there are better options.
 
It does a good job of setting the minimum shootable size for a 357. So it succeeds on that count.

But it's still not a pleasant gun to shoot. Heavy, poor SA trigger, I don't even bother with DA.

I went with "it's OK". The SP101 does what it sets out to do... it just does it with a lot of clunkiness.
 
Last edited:
Mine is a .327FM and I think it's just to loud for a ccw. It is pretty heavy for it's size.
I sent mine to my gunsmith the first week I had it and really lightened it up and smoothed out the trigger on it.
I enjoy shooting it with reduced loads and 90gr SWC bullets. very accurate at 25 yds with those.
I use it for my starter gun when teaching someone to shoot because of the smooth trigger pull and the low recoil from my reduced loads.
I like it alot but I won't carry it.
 
In .327 Federal, it's a 6-shot revolver. Just sayin' ... ;)

I just looked that up as I was reading this thread. I was thinking to myself surely the 327 is a 6 shot?

I never owned a SP101. I always thought they were too heavy for a 5 shot revolver. 24 years ago you could buy a 6 shot Colt Detective Special for about the same $ that was just as bulky as the SP101. There was no CCW in Illinois when I lived there back then so there was little benefit to me to own small handguns, much less HEAVY small revolvers. I worked at a gun shop / range back then and would carry a full size 1911 OWB strong side plus a light weight S&W 637 in my off hand front pocket.

I do like Ruger and own a number of their guns. However, I still have no interest in the SP101. These days with small pocket sized 9mm semi-autos, the heavy limited capacity SP101 makes even less sense to me.

Looking at weights
Ruger SP101 38 special - 5 shot - 26 oz unloaded
https://ruger.com/products/sp101/specSheets/5737.html

Sig P365 9mm - 10 shot - 17.8 oz unloaded - googling loaded weight with 10+1 rds - 23.6 oz
https://www.sigsauer.com/p365-optic-ready.html
 
Semiautomatic pistols are dangerous tools that I'm skilled with.

Revolvers are more like dangerous parts of my hand.

I won't live long enough for my semiauto skills to ever catch up to my revolver muscle memory.

So yeah, I'd prefer the SP101 to the P365.

That's just me. Most modern shooters have more practice with semiautos. Shoot what ya shoot best. :)
 
I've owned three at different times, two with 3" barrels. I'm down to just one now, in .32 H&R. A bit clunky and the belt sander finish is an acquired taste, but they work. They aren't really that much heavier than a similar J-frame -- I checked on an electronic scale and the difference was only one ounce, but somehow they just feel more massive in the hand.

RugerSP10132.jpg

One minor personal gripe: the design requires almost a detailed disassembly for those occasions when I want to remove the cylinder for a more thorough cleaning, as opposed to removing just one screw on a S&W.

Otherwise, I do like the cylinder lockup arrangement.
 
Last edited:
I had a durability problem with a S&W Model 19 2.5”, so I went to an SP101 3” 357…
For me, the form factor, weight, grip, all were just fine.
However, when I fired it at 25yds the first time, aiming at the bullseye gave me a good group…at the bottom left corner of the target sheet. I had to aim at the top right corner to hit the bull. We’re talking about 12” high and 10” left.
Since that SP was a woods pistol as well as a self defense piece, I wanted that 25yd accuracy.
I moved that SP on, and took a chance on a 3” GP100 fixed sight 357. Thankfully, this revolver shoots to point of aim, and I feel it’s an upgrade in a carry/woods gun.
So, I’m also in the “it’s ok” group. If mine had shot to POA, I’d still have it.
 
View attachment 1161027

I don’t carry my SP revolvers in holsters, just this leather “fanny pack”…….when on road trips.
And I carry that slung over the shoulder like a “man bag”.
But do have Triple K holsters for both just in case belt carry is ever desired.

I like this Kelty, they make hiking gear so it's not like it's made for a gun which it is. lol Sometimes the SR9c goes for a ride too.
CC sling.jpg Kelty gun tote.jpg
sp101 8.jpg sp101 9.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Kelty gun tote.jpg
    Kelty gun tote.jpg
    136.9 KB · Views: 1
Best thing about SP's 30 years ago you could pick one up for 250.00 used that would be about 450.00 today.
Guess again. They are going for $550-600 used these days. From about 2014 until 2019 a used SP101 was $400-450 in my area and an area shop sold new ones for $499.95
 
Guess again. They are going for $550-600 used these days. From about 2014 until 2019 a used SP101 was $400-450 in my area and an area shop sold new ones for $499.95

I just purchased a Blue 6" GP100 for 530.00 out the door tax included, so you can find them. ;)
 
Back
Top