I don't know what your game is tblt but you're posting all over the place about which pistol is what and help me make my mind up about this and that, why don't you try following your original thread'(s). you've recieved more than good advice in my opinion on all your different posting's................
always my favorite!Classic - the guy at the gun shop said................
Classic - the guy at the gun shop said................
Classic - the guy at the gun shop said................
comment followed by you should buy a glock instead
I was going to buy a Ruger SR9 but the guy at the gun shop said the one they had went back to Ruger because it fell apart.He said he also herd of another one falling apart at a range.Anyone else herd of this problem?
I purchased a chunky and clunky Ruger (I think it was a P85) about 12 or 13 years ago. It was a pretty good shooting pistol, but I have small hands and had to shift my hand around in order to reach the trigger for the first shot, which was double action. This was not an ideal situation and I eventually sold that pistol.I would be very skeptical of this claim. Every manufacturer has some manufacturing failures. But I have to say that Ruger makes extremely solid weapons - perhaps too solid. The folks who don't like Rugers claim that they are "chunky" or "clunky" - but always solid. People object to the weight and styling of Rugers, but almost never to the construction.
Of course, the SR9 is a new model for Ruger, and anything can happen with a new model. But I would bet that Ruger would produce a pretty solid model. In whatever they make.
Mike
I'm not one to spoil a party but Tblt has 6 seperate threads going as I type this out all pertaining to basiclly the same question so as much as you cherish the QUEST how about a little practicality....................