Rules for a Gunfight

Status
Not open for further replies.
1. Bring a rifle...
2. Preferably shoot at 500+ meters...


:evil:
 
Be elsewhere (avoid bars, shady places after dark, etc.). Encourage in yourself a gentle character that does not bring out the "fight" in others. At the same time, do not become a "victim" phenotype that will draw trouble to you.

If unable, then those other rules come into play.
 
2. Bring a handgun whose caliber starts with a 4.

The numerals of your handgun's caliber should add up to at least 15.

So confusing... one person tells me to bring a .357, someone else says I shouldn't!?!?!?!? What am I to do?:confused:
 
Rule #1: If there's a fight, be somewhere else.

Rule #2: If you can't be somewhere else, be as prepared as possible.

Rule #3: Where-ever possible, take the initiative: get the best escape route, cover, position, etc. Do first, then keep doing. Don't get done to.

Rule #4: Know when to stop, and when to shut up.
 
FCFC,

Also, there should be an additonal rule that says--

5.5 Do not shoot if the person you are fighting has no deadly weapon.

This "rule" is either completely false, or badly worded, depending on how you meant it. Since the meaning is unclear, you should start over, should you feel the need to contribute.

Lethal force should be used only if the defender has a reasonable fear of grave bodily injury to himself or another. This can be from any type of attack, as long as it is reasonable to believe the assailant(s) has/have both the ability and the desire to harm you. Multiple assailants? Infirm defender? Reasonable belief the attacker is amped on drugs? Many factors could lead a reasonable person to feel in danger of grave harm, even if no so-called deadly weapon is glimpsed.

John
 
I have managed a retail store in an inner city location for many years. I have stopped two armed robberies simply by giving off body language that I was ready to draw. Criminals like to feel out their victims to see if they are going to be easy.
 
1. avoid the situation
2. attempt to deescalate the situation
3. bring a rifle
4. shoot to kill

If you do end up shooting, when the cops get there, never admit any guilt. Get your lawyer there, pronto. Stop talking, but if you feel compelled to speak, avoid words like "sorry," or any other words that could be construed to be admitting guilt. You are the innocent victim who could fight back. Don't let anyone other than a jury of your peers tell you otherwise.
 
www.snopes.com search=knife attack

I assume you're talking about this:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/gruesome/kunsan.asp

Claim: Photographs show a USAF airman slashed in a barroom attack in South Korea.

Status: Real photos; inaccurate description.

Examples: [Collected via e-mail, 2006]

PACAF Airman Assaulted with Knife

Kunsan Staff Sergeant Michael Jones, was assaulted in an A-Town bar by unknown assailants. 8th SFS and members of the OSI Detachment 641 B, are investigating. If anyone wishes to donate to the family of SSgt Jones you can call the 8th MXS First Sergeant at 782-4041 or (281) 330-8004.

Origins: The
above-displayed photos of a man with inch-deep slash wounds across his chest and back first reached our inbox March 2006, accompanied by text stating they depicted a United States Air Force (USAF) airman injured in a barroom incident near Kunsan Air Base in South Korea, home of the 8th Fighter Wing, also known as the Wolf Pack. ("A-Town" is a commercial district about three miles from Kunsan Air Base frequented by Americans; "8th SFS" and "8th MXS" designate the 8th Security Forces Squadron (an Air Force police unit) and the 8th Maintenance Squadron, both at Kunsan; and "OSI" refers to a USAF Office of Special Investigations detachment at the air base.)

According to the U.S. military newspaper Stars and Stripes, Air Force officials quickly determined that there had been no such attack involving any USAF personnel around Kunsan, nor was anyone with the name included in the e-mail (Staff Sergeant Michael Jones) currently stationed at Kunsan Air Base:
"The name of the person on that hoax e-mail is not anyone that is stationed at Kunsan," [Capt. Richard] Komurek said. "I don't know in the history of Kunsan if that person was ever stationed here, but when that e-mail came out, that person was not stationed here."

Wing officials, including OSI personnel, checked into the report and within a day or so concluded it was fake, Komurek said.

"We had no such attack and we confirmed that the e-mail was a hoax. We notified the chain of command and the Wolf Pack members about the e-mail right away," he said.

The e-mail gave a DSN number and a commercial number with a Houston area code for those wishing "to donate to the family of SSgt Jones." Repeated calls to the DSN number went unanswered and calls to the Texas number produced a recording stating that the number is not in service.
(Evidently Air Force investigators didn't get the joke — the name and phone number used in the text were taken from Houston rapper Mike Jones' 2005 CD release on the Asylum label, Who Is Mike Jones?, on which he exhorts listeners to "Hit me up: 281-330-8004, baby.")

According to Air Force officials, the photographs are genuine, but they originated in the U.S. and were pictures used by law enforcement authorities for training purposes (possibly documenting the aftermath of a fight between inmates).

Last updated: 26 March 2006

The URL for this page is http://www.snopes.com/photos/gruesome/kunsan.asp

The story mentions nobody being attacked with a knife in a gun fight nor does it mention anything about a gun fight. If you read the article, and know a little something about hip hop/rap, you will notice "SSGT Michael Jones" AKA Mike Jones, the rapper. The phone number provided was "(281) 330-8004" Which is mentioned in one of his songs. I was clearly a hoax about a service man. This story only points of the rule of: "Don't forget to bring your knife to a knife fight.
 
There are no rules for a gunfight, except winning. Everthing else is "after" the gunfight.
1. Once it is over make sure you and your party is ok.
2. Call police if not already there.
3. Call your lawyer.
 
If you fight fair, your tactics suck!

Yes there is such a thing as a "fair fight." It's the one you just lost.

2. "Fairness" is way overrated: Do whatever is necessary to win.

The only thing that matters is survival, "fair" is for Monopoly and checkers.

"If you're in a fair fight, you're doing something wrong."

All these comments on fairness and yet we seem to often get bent out of shape when somebody shoots somebody in the back - LOL!
 
Last edited:
Scanr said:
My ccw instructor said to use this, "I'm not feeling well, I think I need to go to the hospital." He said it is a lot better to be in a warm hospital bed, then sitting at a desk getting questioned or worse a jail cell.

I like this.

I live a pretty peaceful life, haven't been in a fight since high school and very rarely have to spend any effort avoiding one. I figure that if I ever do have to pull a trigger to defend myself, when the dust settles and the police arrive I'm at the very least going to have a bad case of the shakes, and might well be puking my guts out. :( They pressure me into making a statement, it's going to look pretty much like this in their notebook:
" :barf: "
 
Jeff (TexasSkyHawk) and I see some things from very different viewpoints, but he, like many on the board, has a background in law enforcement.

Like many of the moderators. Anyone who doubts there are multiple reasons any reasonable person could feel in fear for his life even without glimpsing a weapon, feel free to PM Johnny Guest, Coronach, Jeff White, Matt G, or 4v50 Gary- all of whom are current or former peace officers. Until then, please stop giving bad advice.

IF you are in fear for your life, and IF you believe the person or persons who confront have the ability to inflict serious injury to you or others, defensive (potentially) lethal force may be called for, especially if you cannot reasonably retreat (leave). I have mentioned some of these, including physical infirmity on the part of the defender.

A close friend of mine is missing the outer part of the vertebra from several inches of his upper spine. A hard blow there could kill or paralyze him. He is fully prepared to use lethal force if attacked by even empty hands, and I believe this is a reasonable choice. I am certain, presented with the facts, any jury would agree.

If you were facing multiple attackers (disparity of force), lethal force might again be called for, even without visible weapons held by the attackers. If a small person was facing a very large person or any defender was facing a person known to be an expert fighter or who appeared to be heavily influenced by certain drugs, lethal force might be called for.

Once again, if a reasonable person would be in fear for his life, and (depending on state) the defender cannot reasonably retreat, lethal force may be called for.

What is a lethal weapon? A lethal weapon is anything that can be used to kill or seriously injure you. Anything can apply- brick, tool, car, you name it. Skilled fists or feet can be lethal. Prior knowledge of a threat counts when talking to the police, and it counts in court. If anyone still feels the need to contest this, I suggest you start a dedicated thread in Tactics.
 
All these comments on fairness and yet we seem to often get bent out of shape when somebody shoots somebody in the back - LOL!

I can 'war game' several scenarios where back shooting would seem perfectly justified, in my mind. In general, shooting someone in the back, would be seen as shooting someone retreating from the fight, the law tends to look unkindly on shooting someone that has left the fight.
 
So, GhostlyKarliion, you'd leave both the .45 and the .25 at home? Thanks, but no thanks. Remember, in the vast majority of cases, shots are never fired, it's the mere presentation of a handgun that solves the problem.

absoultely not, on both statements.

I'll be uncomfortable carrying an effective arm before I will be comfortable carrying a proven uneffective one.

'vast majority' means nothing when the one time that presentation doesn't work. simply put, if you are going to carry a gun then you better be ready to use it to defend yourself, not just show it off and hope the BG leavs you alone.

If you have to empty your gun into the BG, reload, empty it again, reload again, and empty it a third time for any hope of putting enough firepower on the target to stop it, then you are preparing for suicide by BG.

.25 acp won't go through some leather jackets, let alone put down a person.

the .25 acp you will carry will get you killed in short order.

the mininum SD round, imo, is .380, and then only if you are using good quality self defense ammo.

if you want to scare the BG, carry a cop or a dog, if you arent going to use the gun then leave it at home, period.
 
I can 'war game' several scenarios where back shooting would seem perfectly justified, in my mind. In general, shooting someone in the back, would be seen as shooting someone retreating from the fight, the law tends to look unkindly on shooting someone that has left the fight.

We are not talking about somebody who has left the fight, gone home, and we track them down and shoot them in the back. We are talking about somebody who happens to not be facing the good guy shooter during the fight and gets shot in the back. Maybe the bad guy is just moving to a better position of cover (retreating to cover). Just because the bad guy is moving away from you does not mean he is out of the fight or has left the fight. It just means he is moving away from you during the fight.
 
There is only one rule in a gun fight the objective is not necessiarly to win......its just dont loose!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top