Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

S&W 422 or Buckmarck?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by saenzrich, Aug 17, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. saenzrich

    saenzrich Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2010
    Messages:
    436
    Location:
    Austin,Tx.
    Looking to get a new plinker for the range. No special purpose other than shootin' paper. Which would you recommend and why?
     
  2. floorit76

    floorit76 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    615
    I got a 6" 422 target for HS graduation. I shot it side by side with a friends 6"ish heaavy barreled Buckmark. Pretty equal all around, imho. I prefer the 422, probably because I have had it so long. Bought the 4.5" and 3" 2214 also. Definitly lighter.
     
  3. BCRider

    BCRider Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    7,782
    Location:
    Pacific North"Wet" Coast of Canada
    As a 422 owner that has also shot borrowed Buckmarks this would be a hard choice. Both are superb guns. But if I were using it for any speed matches such as Speed Steel I'd go Buckmark. My beloved 422 is a trifle light for rapid firing. I found that the gun and my hands were still wobbling a touch from the recoil by the time I had the sight picture on the next target. Yeah, yeah, I know that the recoil of the AWESOME .22LR isn't much to write home about. But when you're trying to rip off 5 hits in under 3 seconds it matters. For that the Buckmark or an all steel Ruger simply is the better option. But for basic plinking you can pick either and come away a winner.

    Now since you're in the US if you expect to ever want to carry in the woods then I'd go 422 all the way without a single glance back. The mostly alloy 422 is a superb gun for woods carry because of the super slim design and light weight. And if you're up to the job the 422 will keep your camp dinner pot filled in fine form. Mine is every bit as accurate as my Ruger or any other .22 I've shot short of a Hi Standard fancy competition match gun.

    So all in all unless you need the light weight or you need the recoil absorbing mass then it's a wash. Either are great. The only other reason to shift one way or the other would be if kids or small of stature women will be shooting it on a regular basis. There again the light weight of the 422 would seem to point in that direction over the Buckmark.
     
  4. JERRY

    JERRY Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2003
    Messages:
    2,349
    edited....i misread your post.

    my vote is for the buckmark.
     
  5. Onmilo

    Onmilo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    9,773
    Location:
    Illinois`
    422 is discontinued.
    The Buckmark is not,,,
     
  6. Paladin38-40

    Paladin38-40 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2010
    Messages:
    215
    Location:
    Florida's Great Northwest
    Experience with both

    As a plinker I enjoy the S&W 422/622 the most. Mine like CCI Mini-mags best. 15 yard sandbagged groups run 1 1/4" to 1 1/2".

    The Buckmark is more accurate and likes Federal Gold Medal. 15 yard sandbagged groups run 1/2" to 3/4".

    The choice for plinking will boil down to personal prefrence.
     
  7. bannockburn

    bannockburn Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    14,630
    I would vote for the Buckmark. Currently available in any number of variations and to me has a much better feel and balance to it than the S&W Model 422.
     
  8. viking499

    viking499 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    3,444
    Buckmark
     
  9. jrdolall

    jrdolall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Messages:
    2,685
    Location:
    Southeast
    Limited experience with the 422 as I have never owned one but have shot one on several occasions that a buddy owns. The Buckmark "feels" better to me which is a totally subjective opinion.
     
  10. nosmr2

    nosmr2 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    311
    Sold my Buckmark. Was not a fan.
     
  11. usp9

    usp9 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    Messages:
    3,704
    Location:
    Bowling Green, Va
    I have both a 622 and a Buckmark Field 5.5. Either are fun for plinking, but the Buckmark has a better trigger and I shoot it much more accurately. I've never liked the takedown of the 622.

    If you are a lefty, the 622 grip may feel better, as some Buckmarks are made for right hands.

    Because the Buckmark is still made, I'd suggest it over the 622.
     
  12. HankC

    HankC Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2005
    Messages:
    847
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    If one day you consider to fit a can, 422 is a better choice. Barrel is threaded already, just need an adapter and barrel is sitting low.
     
  13. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    48,891
    Location:
    Alabama
    Both are good guns. The Buckmark is more versatile. I sold my 422 because I could not mount a red dot.
     
  14. TimboKhan

    TimboKhan Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Messages:
    8,141
    Location:
    Greeley, CO
    If its just for fun, you will probably eventually end up with both! I am personally not in love with the Buckmark, but there is a lot more stuff for them which allows for some futzing which is fun.
     
  15. dondavis3

    dondavis3 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Messages:
    608
    Location:
    Dallas / Forth Worth Area
    I've enjoyed my Browning buck Mark for years.

    I've added a optic sight to mine.

    BrowningBuckMarkSightMarkReflexS-1.jpg

    It's very reliable and fun to shoot.

    :cool:
     
  16. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    48,891
    Location:
    Alabama
    My .22 autos include a Browning Buckmark, A Sig Trailside, and a S&W M-41.

    The Buckmark points a bit high for me, but is fine if speed is not an issue, as it shoots great and is very dependable. It has lots of aftermarket goodies for it. It is priced very reasonably.

    The Trailside points well for me, is very accurate, but often doesn't lock the slide back and mags are expensive. It is discontinued, but can be found here and there at quite reasonable prices.

    The Model 41 points perfectly for me, is very accurate, and mags are reasonably priced. The gun is pricey, but superb.
     
  17. Bush Pilot

    Bush Pilot Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,636
    What did you expect? You should have purchased a fan if you wanted to move air.
     
  18. viking499

    viking499 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    3,444
    Good one.
     
  19. budman46

    budman46 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    71
    Location:
    north central pennsylvania
    saenzrich,

    i like my buchmark 5.5" target, love my hi-standard similarly equipped, but prefer my ruger 5.5" bull, target-sighted 22/45. i swapped in a $30 volquartsen sear that brings the trigger to less than 2 lbs; they're available for $249 from grice's wholesale in clearfield, pa.
     
  20. gb6491

    gb6491 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    Messages:
    1,708
    Location:
    Yuma County, Arizona
    FWIW, the Hammerli X-esse is pretty much the same gun as the Trailside and is currently in production and available in the USA through Larry's Guns.
    Trailside/X-esse magazines run about $35.

    I have a 422 and several Buck Marks. I prefer the Buck Marks because of their trigger and the platform's greater adaptability. The 422, with it's high mounted sights and threaded barrel, would be handy if someone wanted put a can on it.
    Regards,
    Greg
     
  21. Oldnoob

    Oldnoob Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    327
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Never own or shot 422/622. But my 2206 was very well made and I love the size and weight. I'll choose my 2206 over Buckmark any day.

    SW2206.jpg
     
  22. Pilot

    Pilot Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    6,652
    Location:
    USA
    Gawd those S&W's are UGLY.

    Buckmark or Ruger MK II.
     
  23. Certaindeaf

    Certaindeaf member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    5,170
    Location:
    Wet Oregon
    I have a 4" 422. Yep, they's uglyyy but shoot sooo well.. and light.
    I'd get a Browning Nomad over any new Browning or Ruger.
     
  24. slidemuzik

    slidemuzik Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Messages:
    93
    Location:
    Central Bluegrass
    Buddy just got the Buckmark. Field stripping alone rules it out for me. Any of the Smith's tear down easily compared to Ruger or Buckmark. If you want light, get the 622. Better finish than 422. If you want solid weight go 2206. 2206TGT is drilled and tapped for optics, finely adjustable Millet target sights, and has fat target grips.
     
  25. snooperman

    snooperman Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,143
    I have the 6" 622 and prefer it over the Buckmark which I sold.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page