Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

S&W 686 owners... A question.

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by BoneDigger, Apr 23, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BoneDigger

    BoneDigger Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    272
    Location:
    Tyler, TX
    I recently purchased a Smith and Wesson 686-2 with a 2.5 inch barrel. It has custom wood grips, and I really like the gun. It's a heavy gun and I don't know that I would ever carry it concealed. I mostly bought it because it was a good price and figured I could use it as a backup for pig hunting.

    So, I have been offered a trade for a Smith and Wesson 686-4 with a 4 inch barrel. They are in comparable condition, but his gun has hogue rubber grips, where mine has custom wood grips. They will not interchange, since mine is a round butt, and his is square.

    Do I keep my 2.5 inch 686-2 or do I make the swap and get the 686-4 with 4 inch barrel? They are both stainless and basically identical except for the grips and barrel length.

    What do you guys think? Would I be gaining much by having a 4 inch barrel instead of the 2.5 inch barrel? This little 2.5 inch feels really good, but if I am losing a lot of speed/power, maybe I should trade? Is there anything better or worse about the -2 or -4?

    Todd
     
  2. YodaVader

    YodaVader Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    940
    Location:
    Indiana
    It sounds like you really like the 2.5" so in your place I would just keep it. I have owned 686s in the 2.5" , 4" and 6" barrel lengths. The 2.5 I had was a hec of a shooter. The 2.5 obvously has the shortest sight radius so sight alingment will be the most critical. The only one I own now is a 686-4 with a 6" barrel - very accurate!

    The 686-2 will have the hammer and trigger coated to look sort of like stainless , the 686-4 have the trigger and hammer uncoated with the case hardened visible. The -4 also has the drilled and tapped frame. I had heard that the -4 was the first model to be machined on their new CNC equipment , not 100% on that one. There might be more differences that I am not aware of.
     
  3. ArchAngelCD

    ArchAngelCD Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    22,574
    Location:
    Northeast PA, USA
    If you really want the 4" M686 tell the seller he has to make up for the Custom Wooden Stocks some how. I would say $60 in cash instead of a straight up trade would be fair.
     
  4. Sistema1927

    Sistema1927 Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2004
    Messages:
    4,632
    Location:
    "Land of (dis)Enchantment"
    Are you sure that the 4" has a square butt and not just round to square conversion grips?
     
  5. sw686plus

    sw686plus Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2007
    Messages:
    23
    I have read in the past that ammunition doesn't have the chance to expel it's gases, etc to its full potential in a revolver with less than a 4 inch barrel on it.

    If you're not going to carry it anyway, I'd agree the guy should throw in some cash for the wooden grips, then make the exchange.
     
  6. ZeSpectre

    ZeSpectre Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Location:
    Deep in the valley
    686 in 4" barrel is one of my all time favorite handguns period! Never liked a shorter barrel for .357

    This is, of course, personal preference.
     
  7. ryan b

    ryan b Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    102
    Location:
    Arkansas
    you are also missing and important point Does your state have a min. barrel legnth for hunting in arkansas you must use a 4 inch or longer. i prefer the 4 inch and i have had both
     
  8. glockman19

    glockman19 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,699
    I agree
     
  9. ArchAngelCD

    ArchAngelCD Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    22,574
    Location:
    Northeast PA, USA
    I have a 4" S&W M619 and a 2.75" Ruger Police Service-Six, both are .357 Magnum and both are great shooters. I think the 4" is the most versatile but the 2.75" can be carried. I like them both equally but for different reasons and applications.
     
  10. Moonclip

    Moonclip Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,766
    Location:
    USA
    I'd keep your gun and buy a 6" 357 maybe later or a 44mag possibly if you feel need for a more powerful sidearm. I've noticed myself at least with Ruger security/speed/service six guns that snubs go for a premium, he would be getting a better deal especially with the grips.

    People rarely get back what they put in to guns when trading or selling. Recently I got a S&W that was already a good price but the grips were Hogue wood worth 60-80 bucks new and with millett sight worth another 80 or so. Made deal even better.
     
  11. BoneDigger

    BoneDigger Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    272
    Location:
    Tyler, TX
    I appreciate all of the great replies. As a side note, I am not planning to "hunt" with the gun, just carry it as a backup sidearm WHILE hunting. I have a CHL, so I can carry any length barrel I want.

    In real world numbers, is the 2.5 inch going to give up any penetration to the 4"? I realize speed equates to kenetic energy, but am I losing a lot by having the 2.5 inch?

    Todd
     
  12. Iggy

    Iggy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,011
    Location:
    Wyoming
    I think the rule of thumb is you lose about 50 FPS per inch of barrel reduction.

    Most likely, neither you or the pig will notice the difference.
     
  13. MrBorland

    MrBorland Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2007
    Messages:
    4,400
    Location:
    NC
    One other thing to maybe consider: I only have a 4" 686 myself, but I understand that the ejector rod on sub-3" guns isn't long enough to eject the spent brass efficiently, making for a slower re-load. If reloading speed is or would be an issue, the 4" might be the better choice.
     
  14. BoneDigger

    BoneDigger Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    272
    Location:
    Tyler, TX
    Well, I took the 2.5 inch to the range today and put about 100 rounds through it. Some were WWB .38 solid points, and some were .357 110grain JHP (also WWB). I was TOTALLY blown away by how well this little gun shoots. I am not a good shot by any means, but I was able to keep all six shots of .357 in a 6 inch diameter circle at 25 yards (75 ft). That was shooting off hand without a bench/rest. The trigger is like butter!

    I have decided to keep this little girl, and in the fall when I start hunting again, I may buy a .44 Mag for a backup for the pig hunting.

    Anyway, thanks for all of the great replies.

    Todd
     
  15. YodaVader

    YodaVader Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    940
    Location:
    Indiana
    No full power 357 mag ammo is going to reach its full potential in a 4" either , or 6" or 8 3/8" for that matter. A lot of powder for a relatively short barrel. That is why you have this incredible muzzle blast. Shoot the same ammo in a Marlin lever action rifle and then the 357 is more likely to reach its potential.

    Yep , my 2 1/2" 686 was a shooter too! It sounds like you are going to do well by just keeping it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page