S&W now to make the "M&P15"

Status
Not open for further replies.
*Sigh* back in the old days on TFL there was a moderator enforced limit on the number of posts about locks in a S&W thread. Be happy! Another company is bringing out a new gun. Yesterday the story was that USRAC was gone and with it the Winchester rifles. Now we have some good news and people are pissing and moaning. Think of it as an opportunity. Start writing to S&W and ask them for a gas piston upper. with all the new products they put out, they are probably more likely than H&K ever will be to sell one to the civilian market.
 
S&W should make a shotgun and start selling package deals to police departments;it seems every cop needs to have an AR-15 now and I'm sure they could make some sweet deals to claw back the cop market from Glock.

It makes sense for them to built an AR,they're the hot ticket right now-actually I think KelTec is dumb for not making their polymer pistol into an M4 lookalike as it would fly off the shelves if priced the same as the SU.
 
outofbattery said:
S&W should make a shotgun and start selling package deals to police departments;it seems every cop needs to have an AR-15 now and I'm sure they could make some sweet deals to claw back the cop market from Glock.

Shotguns have fallen from favor of late. The patrol rifle is the hot thing right now.

I think having a package of handgun, patrol rifle, training and maintenance will get you the business.
 
I was thinking more like putting "tactical orange" stocks on and making the departments buy new less-lethal munitions launchers.Sell em everything from handcuffs to knives in the process.

If only they'd hire me to be a salesguy.
 
adaman04 said:
Yeah as in they're trying to become a total sell out to the average American. Internal locks now, next they won't be selling to civilians any more. Weeee! :banghead:

They already tried that, and the response nearly bankrupted them.

My biggest problem is with the use of the name for some plastic POS. But I'm an old fussbudget.
 
TechBrute said:
I thought that having the disconnect removed was the #1 mod for them.

Springfield 1911s have locks now? Good grief...

Yup. Part of a trigger job for a BHP.

The Springfield locks aren't a problem because they are located in the mainspring housing. Swap the mainspring housing with an aftermarket jobbie...............no more lock.
 
I for one am relieved. Just the other day I was saying to a buddy, "you know, what we need is for some innovative manufacturer out there to make a COPY of the AR-15." I know! It's unprecedented. But think about. One can hardly find an AR-15 these days...and the patents have all expired. Plus, with the whole DoD thing, most of the parts are made by subcontractors! Some innovative company could step up, slap the parts together, stamp their rollstamp on there, and call it good!

I can't believe no one's tried this before. I mean, the market is RIPE.

*whew* More sarcasm than is recommended for human consumption. :uhoh:
 
stevelyn said:
The Springfield locks aren't a problem because they are located in the mainspring housing. Swap the mainspring housing with an aftermarket jobbie...............no more lock.
While I'm relieved to hear that, it would be great if they just made it an option or included the real housing, etc.
 
am i the only one that's bothered by S&W making their new pistol and rifles and calling them "Military and Police"? they're reminding me of H&K. screw those peon civilians, these guns are for the military and police only. i wouldn't even think about buying one. maybe if they made a "Defense Against Tyranny model, the DAT, i'd buy one.

Bobby
 
Bobarino said:
am i the only one that's bothered by S&W making their new pistol and rifles and calling them "Military and Police"? they're reminding me of H&K. screw those peon civilians, these guns are for the military and police only. i wouldn't even think about buying one. maybe if they made a "Defense Against Tyranny model, the DAT, i'd buy one.

Bobby
I honestly have no more problem with a manufacturer targeting a specific demographic like the Military or Police than I do producing a "Varmit" rifle, a "Hunting" rifle, a "Cowboy" pistol, or anything else designed to attract a certain segment.

Oh, and ALL guns are the DAT models...
 
When I read this I looked out the window.

Yes, a snowball just flew by in Houston, TX. I then saw a pig fly by a flock of flying turtles.

What a week Winchester tanks the 94/70 and S&W makes a Colt AR clone.


:banghead:
 
I think SW would be betteroff making something unique, we all do right... Whatever happened to the revolving rifles? I think a revolving rifle in .460 xhv or 500 mag would just be uber-cool and in-line with their rep as inovative pistoleros...
 
mndfusion said:
I think SW would be betteroff making something unique, we all do right... Whatever happened to the revolving rifles? I think a revolving rifle in .460 xhv or 500 mag would just be uber-cool and in-line with their rep as inovative pistoleros...

I wanted a Remington Revolving Carbine since I was a kid. I was testing out my then new Yugo SKS at the 25 yard range when a gent took the station beside me. He uncased an Italian replica (I think Uberti) of the Remington chambered in .45 Colt.

I was firing from the bench as was he and the only barrier between us was a screen of hardware cloth. At his first shot I felt stinging on my cheek. The second debris from it some how found the seam of my shooting glasses and hit me at the corner of my right eye:what: .

It stung like a :cuss: . I yell and he looks over and I tell him what happened. we figured out that gases and particles were escaping the cylinder gap bombarding anyone standing (or sitting) to either side of the Remington (luck me it was not shaving lead).

kjeff50cal

BTH that is why you HAVE to hold a revolving rifle sort of like a two hand, Weaver style grip otherwise your foregrip arm is going to get "tatooed".
 
mndfusion said:
I think SW would be betteroff making something unique, we all do right... Whatever happened to the revolving rifles? I think a revolving rifle in .460 xhv or 500 mag would just be uber-cool and in-line with their rep as inovative pistoleros...

'Cause "Homeland Defense" contracts don't specify revolving rifles.....

This whole Homeland Security thing just rains money on companies that can take advantage of it.
 
BINGO!! The government is sticking out another teet and of course S&W wants to get at it to. Also I think the "Military&Police" is a great marketing tool, a lot of sheep will see that and think that if that is what their getting than the individual wants one too. Just like why people buy M4 Colts.:)
 
the one stop shopping seems reasonable. they used,i don't know about now,offer a police bicycle.
 
Peter M. Eick said:
What a week Winchester tanks the 94/70 and S&W makes a Colt AR clone.
:banghead:

Colt AR clone??? :scrutiny:

Do you mean the Colt AR that was an Armalite clone?

Yeah, thought so.

A reputable company making a new gun, even a tried-and-true AR, is never a bad thing. Repeat that to yourself about 1,000 times.
 
<hijack> Y'all know that the Armalite that exists now is not the same Armalite that developed early Stoner weapons, right? </hijack>
 
The March 2006 edition of Guns and Ammo has the SW M&P15 on the cover.

I haven't read the article yet, but the MSRP is $1700. :what:
 
Fly320s said:
The March 2006 edition of Guns and Ammo has the SW M&P15 on the cover.

I haven't read the article yet, but the MSRP is $1700. :what:
The $1700 model is the "T" designation. Quad rail, Troy backup sights, and other extras. The standard model I believe is around $1200.
 
The standard model I believe is around $1200.

Happily for Smith & Wesson, a hoard of gunwriters will repeat the mantra of "you can't cheap out when your life is on the line". This will justify paying twelve to seventeen hundred dollars for a rifle that S&W doesn't even manufacture themselves.

Basic Bushmaster: $700-900
Basic DPMS: $600-800

For the same design with the same features, how can you justify paying more?
 
You obviously don't work for the government, Nightcrawler. ;)

Mike
 
Nightcrawler said:
Happily for Smith & Wesson, a hoard of gunwriters will repeat the mantra of "you can't cheap out when your life is on the line". This will justify paying twelve to seventeen hundred dollars for a rifle that S&W doesn't even manufacture themselves.

Basic Bushmaster: $700-900
Basic DPMS: $600-800

For the same design with the same features, how can you justify paying more?
It's not just the features that you're paying for. QC plays a big part of it. Colt, Bushmaster, and DPMS have distinctly varying levels of QC. But, then again, ignorance is bliss, and S&W isn't going for DPMS's target demographic, they are going after Colt's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top