Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

S&W's AR-15 or Bushmaster

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by MrBill120, May 29, 2008.

?

S&W's M&P15 or a Bushmaster?

Poll closed Jun 28, 2008.
  1. S&W M&P15

    54 vote(s)
    62.1%
  2. Bushmaster

    33 vote(s)
    37.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MrBill120

    MrBill120 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Messages:
    206
    Location:
    The Cold North East
    I saw the S&W M&P15 in Gander Mtn the other day. Has S&W done anything different w/ their "AR-15" as opposed to say Bushmaster?

    (Kind of like how S&W added and external extractor to their 1911's...)

    And now a poll.......which one? :D
     
  2. Logistics

    Logistics Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Messages:
    191
    Location:
    midwest
    >>>Kind of like how S&W added and external extractor to their 1911's...<<<

    Really? Why?
     
  3. Jst1mr

    Jst1mr Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2008
    Messages:
    277
  4. jackdanson

    jackdanson Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    859
    Love my m&p. No differences that I can notice.
     
  5. Eightball

    Eightball Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    4,257
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    Many people around where I live have had bad experiences with Bushmaster. Not so much with the Smiths. Plus, if you get an early one, some parts were done by Stag. So, it's a win-win situation!

    That being said, I like my RRA :D
     
  6. ugaarguy

    ugaarguy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    12,013
    You don't want an early one. S&W had problems with Stag supplied parts, and brought production in house. Pat Rogers has given the new M&P-15 his endorsement as well. Considering the run hard & fast round counts the guns at EAG go through that's a big endorsement. New guns will be stamped 5.56 NATO on the bbl. Old ones are stamped 5.56 Nato. Newer S&W M&P-15s are a very good buy. If you buy the upper and lower separately you can put together an LMT for about $1000 as well.
     
  7. longdayjake

    longdayjake Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,605
    Location:
    Genesee, ID
    S&Ws are really nice as far as I am concerned. I would take one over a bushmaster any day because their uppers fight much tighter than the Bushy. That to me is reason enough to get one.
     
  8. brighamr

    brighamr Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,179
    Location:
    somewhere between utah and canada
    S&W. I looked at both rifles, felt the differences (fit mainly) and decided or the S&W. Now I've put about 2000 rounds through it, and I'm impressed! For what it is (16" bbl) it's pretty darn accurate out to 200 yards, and I got a $100 rebate :evil: Can't beat that!
     
  9. cracked butt

    cracked butt Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    6,986
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    I've looked at S&W rifles- they are nice. All things being equal, I'd rather do business with another manufacturer that hasn't sold out gun owners.
     
  10. SSN Vet

    SSN Vet Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    5,775
    Location:
    The Dark Side of the Moon
    Here's my take, from an admitedly limited perspective.

    Functionally....

    LMT & Colt are high end.....

    then there's a large number of manufacturer's in the middle.

    then there's some enonomy manufactures, like Olympic, Del-Ton, etc...

    It seems like both Bushmaster and S&W are both squarely seated in the middle class, perhaps the UMC.

    Howerver, S&W are reported to have tight mag wells.....have read reports that P-mags do not work in them. P-mags are probably the most popular and reliable mags.


    Other consideration.....

    Bushmaster is up in Maine (a free state....where I am). I doubt you'll find an anti within 20 miles of Windham, ME, where Bushmaster has their facility. Bushmaster has never sold out the R2K&BA community.

    Smith and Wesson is down in Massachusettes......one of the biggest anti states in the country. You can read up on S&Ws iffy track record, appeasing the Clinton admin. to save their own necks.....right up their with Bill Ruger in many peoples opinions.

    You decide which economy and which company you want to support with your dollars.

    so I'd say support the
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2008
  11. Browning

    Browning Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,485
    Location:
    DFW - TX
    When I compared the S&W M&P15 w/the Bushmaster Mod. AR15 the M&P was a little better

    If you get the flat top M&P with the flip up sights then it certainly has better sights (from Troy Industries) then the Bushie flat tops and I like the finish on the S&W a little better as well (it's a little darker instead of kind of grey like on the Bushmaster).

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    I like the sights on the M&P better than I do on a similar AR15 from Bushmaster that basically has all the same basic features and is meant for the same thing.

    http://www.bushmaster.com/catalog_xm15_BCWVMF16FMC.asp


    Other than that for the most part though there's not alot of difference between them that I can tell.
     
  12. teombe

    teombe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    187
    Location:
    AZ
    S&W, no doubt. The Smiths are cheaper, tested better, and from what I've seen, they run.
     
  13. armed85

    armed85 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    373
    To suggest a company like Smith & Wesson or Ruger is anti gun ownership when said companies are in the business of selling firearms to civilians doesn't make your argument very appealing.
     
  14. MrBill120

    MrBill120 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Messages:
    206
    Location:
    The Cold North East
    Jst1mr - thanks for the link to the Shooting Times article.

    And I'd like to thank everyone who's thown in their views. I actually know nothing about the AR platform so I'm eating up all of the views and opinions!
     
  15. W.E.G.

    W.E.G. Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    7,392
    Location:
    all over Virginia
  16. Ridgerunner665

    Ridgerunner665 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,393
    Location:
    Upper East Tennessee
    Well said and 100% true...

    W.E.G.,
    The "chart" has been updated...here's an up to date version.
    I edited this chart myself....in both the old and new "charts"...it is marked that S&W uses M16 bolt carriers....I've inspected a few dozen S&W's (including my own)...they DO NOT use M16 bolt carriers

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2008
  17. W.E.G.

    W.E.G. Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    7,392
    Location:
    all over Virginia
    Thanks.

    I'll update to the newer version of "the chart" when this question comes up again.

    ...which should be any minute now.
     
  18. snakeman

    snakeman Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,079
    Location:
    texas
    I would definitely go for the S&W or a good Olyarms. I have an Olyarms multimatch that will outshoot the two bushmasters and the $1400 rock river that it has to compete with on our ranch.
     
  19. possum

    possum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,942
    Location:
    Concord, N.C.
    i would go with bushmaster, unless of course the that particular m&p was a stag built one and then either one would be fine and do you good.
     
  20. snakeman

    snakeman Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,079
    Location:
    texas
    Stag firearms are fine rifles.
     
  21. strat81

    strat81 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,912
    Location:
    Nebraska
    Buy what ever is cheaper or whichever rollmark you prefer. I'd consider them about equal with one difference: S&W is reputed to have excellent customer service. I've never heard anything good or bad about BM customer service.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page