San Fran getting worse...IQ's plunging.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Riktoven

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
233
I just copied and pasted this from Glock Talk, my apologies if the link isn't working. <EDIT> Here's a working link: http://cbs5.com/local/local_story_136215501.html </EDIT> You guys will love this verbal garbage straight from the mouths of human garbage.

----------------------------------------

Linky:

San Francisco Proposes New Gun Control Measures

Simon Perez
Reporting

(CBS 5) SAN FRANCISCO San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom hailed new proposed city gun legislation, and he did it Wednesday from the neighborhood most plagued by gun violence.

“Enough is enough,” said Newsom in the city’s Bayview district. “We need common sense gun control.” 1

The announcement came nearly one year after a judge struck down a law banning handgun possession in the city.

One part of the measure outlaws the possession or sale of guns on any city-owned property, expanding the current ban from buildings like City Hall and schools to include outdoor locations like city parks.

Mayor Newsom said he also hopes to extend the ban to public housing complexes, but federal laws may make that complicated.

The proposed legislation would also require people who commit crimes with guns to sign up with the police department, then probation officers could keep better tabs on them.

Another aspect would require all gun owners to store their guns disabled with a trigger lock or placed in a locked-box. Authorities said lock boxes would help to keep legal guns from being stolen and then later used illegally.

"It is fair to say that a majority of gun crime is committed with illegal guns," District Attorney Kamala Harris said. “It’s a reality that a lot of weapons and guns that we find in connection with a homicide are stolen."

The idea, she contends, is to remind legal gun owners how to behave.2

"Just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in the way that you conduct your affairs," Harris said.3


San Francisco's only gun shop is also a target of the proposed legislation, which would require it and any future gun shops in the city to send police officials a gun sales list every six months.

Even though criminals already don't follow the law, city leaders believe any gun crackdown makes the city safer.4

“It’s just time and it’s the right thing to do,” said Harris, citing existing laws in Alameda and Los Angeles counties that are similar to the proposed ones for San Francisco.

(© MMVII, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.)


-------------------------------------------------------

I don't understand how these officials at all levels of government are being elected. Kwame in Detroit, this guy in SF, and half of our congressmen and senators...between corruption, stupidity, and outright treason I just don't understand how these people hold public offices. Are our elections fixed, or are most people just really stupid?
 
Another aspect would require all gun owners to store their guns disabled with a trigger lock or placed in a locked-box. Authorities said lock boxes would help to keep legal guns from being stolen and then later used illegally.

Seems that I've heard that before... Might it have been in Washington, D.C.??? :rolleyes:
 
"Just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in the way that you conduct your affairs," Harris said.3

Not without a proper warrant naming the items to be seized you don't. :fire:
 
Yep, it's now our fault whatever criminals do - because we're being made out to be criminals also!

"Just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in the way that you conduct your affairs," Harris said

Oh I'd LOVE to see you come in to my home and check. Man they can't abandon the Constitution fast enough for gun owners but if you try it with the first amendment they go nuts!
 
We're already beating this one to death over at calguns.net; amid all the usual consternation and complaints (come on guys! If you're going to post something, at least post something constructive - yes we all know that the rest of the country is a free paradise where 1911s are issued to the citizenry by smiling quartermasters. And we also know that apparently the rest of the country has strong, almost fearful, opinions about the situation, but y'all don't live here...so shut up!), the general feeling is that this will amount to nothing. Like most (all?) of these types of proposals by most (all?) politicians, pretty much everywhere.
 
Very possibly this is more zany fun from Gavin the Loon to keep people wondering if he is finished with rehab. It is bordering on the plan of Washington DC, which has been sort of neutered. It would unlikely survive court process and may be pre-empted by CA law, which was the real basis on which the handgun ban was overturned. 2A had nothing to do with it, despite what NRA said, AFAIK.
 
Ya know, that's cute and funny, but the truth is that the crap they enact in CA is only a few years ahead of the rest of ya'll.

They constantly chip away at your rights...before you know it, they're in your living room telling you how to live your life.

Ed
 
Sorry, but cali deserves it. They've taken all of their .gov's refuse and haven't strung the crooks up yet.
 
I say we revoke the full BOR for CA. No more freedom of speech, including no religion, no press, nothing. No firearms. Soldiers are welcome to take houses and live there... no matter what reason. No right to privacy... not online... not anywhere. No matter whether innocent or guilty... all crimes will be pleaded "guilty". No bail... ever... or if there is bail, it is nothing less than an arm and a leg.

If they don't like it.... don't forget that they have no right to assemble and/or protest.

After a while, you think they'd get the point?

Unfortunately, the only reason this can't be done, is because there are believers in the BOR in CA. They just don't typically have government positions. :scrutiny:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top