San Francisco Proposes New Gun Control Measures

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, and they think some damn law is going to get people who commit crimes with guns to "sign up with the police department"

Man, I really need to get some of what they're smoking.
 
They can walk in on me.

I'll be twirling an AK-47 and wearing a toga, while prancing around the living room in a manner that makes Richard Simmons look like Roberto Duran.

:neener::neener::neener:
 
The idea, she contends, is to remind legal gun owners how to behave.

"Just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in the way that you conduct your affairs," Harris said.

Jesus H. Christ:uhoh:
 
Truly mind numbingly stupid

The last law got struck down because of preemption, as will this one.
The good thing is that it shows their true colors and can be used as a fund raising opportunity for the NRA.
I have a "Green Party" friend in SF, voted for Nadar...a super duper lib.
He donated to the NRA after the last law was proposed.
 
"Just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in the way that you conduct your affairs," Harris said.

Oh yeah?
 
"Just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in the way that you conduct your affairs," Harris said.


Wow. That is a very scary statement that perhaps needs some clarification by Ms. Harris. Is she espousing 1930's-Germany-like raids on her own citizens to check for "lawbreakers" without any other motive? :eek: Use a copy of the Constitution for TP this morning Ms. Harris?

San Fransisco really is like a different country, isn't it?
 
More from Newsom and this Harris person

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/05/16/BAG1FPROBM1.DTL&hw=gun&sn=009&sc=514

Mayor offers package of gun control laws
He seeks to prohibit firearms possession on city property

Cecilia M. Vega, Chronicle Staff Writer

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Mayor Gavin Newsom quietly introduced a package of gun control measures on Tuesday that would make it illegal to possess guns on city-owned property and require residents to store handguns in locked containers.

But, even some of the legislation's co-sponsors conceded the proposals will have little effect on the proliferation of illegal guns on San Francisco streets.

Newsom, who plans to formally announce the measures at a press conference in the Bayview district today , said there "needs to be common sense restrictions on gun ownership."

"We should continue our efforts to restrict the use of legal guns and we will continue our efforts to stem the tide of illegal guns," Newsom said.

The measures would make it illegal to possess or sell guns or ammunition on any city-owned property, including parks and public buildings. Residents would also be required to keep handguns locked in a container or be disabled with a trigger lock.

Though there is only one gun store located in San Francisco, the legislation targets licensed dealers by requiring them to provide police with an inventory list every six months so that authorities could keep track of how many guns are sold. "It's about that one gun shop and making a statement to anyone who's thinking about opening up," said District Attorney Kamala Harris, who is one of several politicians who have signed on to co-sponsor the legislation.

"It's focused on making it as inconvenient and as difficult as possible for people to possess guns in a way that people will be harmed," she added.


The measures also would create a local registry of people who are convicted in San Francisco of gun-related offenses.

Supervisor Sophie Maxwell, another co-sponsor, whose district includes the Bayview, conceded the overall effect of the legislation is "small, but at least it's something."

In 2005, the mayor expressed lukewarm support for Proposition H, a measure that would have made it illegal to buy and sell firearms and ammunition in the city. Though 58 percent of voters passed the measure, it is being appealed in court after a challenge by the National Rifle Association. Newsom had said the measure amounted to "a public opinion poll."

Now that he is campaigning for re-election in November, some of his City Hall critics questioned Newsom's timing.

"It's just election-year pandering," Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin said.

Supervisor Chris Daly, who spearheaded Prop. H and regularly opposes Newsom, said he was glad to see the mayor focusing on gun control.

"I'm glad the mayor has finally figured out that San Franciscans are for strong gun control in the city," Daly said. "I would have preferred more support for the handgun ban."

E-mail Cecilia M. Vega at [email protected].

And these two were ELECTED!? :what:
 
Quote:
"Just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in the way that you conduct your affairs," .
Adolph Hitler, 1935
 
"Just because you're legally District Attorney in the sanctity of your locked office doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that office and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in the way that you conduct your affairs," Prince Yamato said.
 
"Just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in the way that you conduct your affairs," Harris said.

So apparently the constitution of the US does not mean anything to people in San Fransico and neither to the State itself. This is bad legislation covering up the inability of the current police forces to handle the situation.
 
This is SF. They are their own ultra-left enclave. I imagine the citizens in SF support this stuff.. after all voters passed the handgun ban through the proposition process. It passed by a decent margin too.. so it's obvious the SF citizens want more gun control. Sad.

And, unfortunately, for those of us outside of the PRC, it looks as though the rest of the state isn't that far behind San Fran Freako. I wish you guys well. But, it looks as though you guys are beyond the point of no return. I really feel for ya. :(
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top