I must disagree with Bountyhunter in the strongest way. Para's LDA pistols are some of the most practical and user friendly pistols I have every shot.
I also enjoy shooting mine. But if you understood the LDA mechanism better, you would know there are a number of possible failure modes or malfunctions which will render it non-operational for the round chambered up.
1) Dud round? You can not cock the hammer and get a second strike, the slide must be cycled by hand to reset the internal cocking cam.
2) The internal cam can "release" without firing from a number of causes, ie the sear slipping off the hammer hook due to lower sear spring strength. If that cam releases, you will still believe the gun is cocked and ready to fire (hammer will be forward) but when you pull the trigger, nothing will happen.
3) Trigger bar release failure. The cocking cam's rotation to the elongated side must drive the trigger bar below the hammer's tail hook so it can be driven forward. If the cam wears enough along that edge, the trigger bar will snag on the hammer and cause it to "hang" halfway forward. Again, no fire and the slide must be hand cycled.
4) Series 80 block failure to lift. The mechanism by which the FP blocking plunger is lifted out of the way is somewhat complicated, and the lifter is a flat piece of stamped metal. If it wears along the edge, the block will gradually be lifted less and drag on the firing pin giving random light strike failures.
For the record: my gun has had failures #2, #3, and #4 at various points with less than 5000 total rounds fired. It is currently operational (new parts installed).
As I said, I enjoy shooting my LDA. Based on the complexity of the mechanical design and the number of stamped metal parts in the fire control hardware, I would not choose to bet my life on it. I acknowledge it is being used in LE, so they obviously do not share that opinion.