Schwarzenegger Groped Hollywood Women

Status
Not open for further replies.
Who cares what BC did? He's gone. Move on.
Click to expand...


Patriots care when traitors escape justice. And he's not gone - he's still out there running his mouth and influencing politics. I'll count him gone when he assumes room temperature.


And his legacy will plague us for many years after THAT point.
 
Schwarzenegger is not the savior for California. I don't know that California can be saved. I'm glad I don't live there.

Best wishes to those that do.

Smoke
 
Is it OK for famous people to get a pass on sexual assault allegations, or should they be investigated?
Click to expand...
I think that we should investigate all allegations to the point where commerce, education and other business all stop. :rolleyes:

I wonder if someone may have heard allegations that you tried to kiss that little blonde back in the second grade, you know, the one you allegedly caught alone under the fire escape? Maybe there was a woman last week in the elevator and alleged suspicions you saw a flach of nipple when she leaned over to press the 16th floor button? Maybe allegations that you liked it? :neener:

Maybe we should have mandatory injections of female hormones until men are safely married, then only give them a short acting antidote for the hour it takes to conceive a child? :what:
 
If the woman had been traumatized by the incident, she would've called the police back then. The only reason its an issue now is cuz he's running for office, which makes it BS. So what.

Who was it that said "Whether they give or refuse, women are always glad to have been asked"?

If she'da grabbed his butt and he turned her down, then it'd be much worse for him! (Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned...!)

:rolleyes:
 
At least he gropes a hotter looking class of babes than Clinton did. Clinton's collection could have been mistaken for a class photo from the local SPCA.
 
If the woman had been traumatized by the incident, she would've called the police back then.
Click to expand...

Of course..... women never decline to pursue such cases to avoid the embarrassment.

And rape victims never keep quiet because they are afraid nobody would believe them if they accused a celebrity and then they would be put on trial in the press....

Anybody else heard of the Kobe Bryant case? I think the news ran a story on it some time back.
 
1) Clinton was impeached because he lied under oath in a sexual assault case with Paula Jones.
Click to expand...

Speaking of confusing an issue... FYI, Clinton was never impeached. A bill of charges was not brought forth by the senate and he was not tried before the house. he may have felt threatened with impeachment, he was not impeached.

BTW: if Clinton had actually been impeached (charges brought) the trial would have been mandatory. The last pres to be impeached was Nixon. A set of charges were brought and carried into an indictment, but he worked out a deal to run in exchange for no trial. If he had stayed, there would have been a trial. The only president to be both impeached and tried was Andrew Johnson, and he missed being convicted at his impeachment trial by a single vote.

To clear up a common misconception:

the word "impeach" is latin and translates literally to "I accuse".

Impeach means that an actual accusatory bill of charges is approved and brought against the president. The following trial is what detrmines if he will be removed from office. So, bouncing a pres is a two-step process: impeach, then trial.
 
to the deliberately offensive DaveB

*** back to you too. I find your words offensive. so there!

It was a shame that Clinton was threatened with impeachment because the raucus was politically motivated. I did not like Clinton but I recognized such political manouvering was imappropriate.

and now my state has double shame. First the incompetent Davis failed to fight the recall _by asking for forgiveness from the voters_, and second the mud-slining going on to try to hurt the ex-bodybuilder.

Finally, the appropriatel response to a groping hand is a backhand to the face right then and there. Or some harsh words if the backhand is too much to contemplate. eitherway, sexual mis-steps by Clinton, Davis, Sch... should NEVER be slung over discussions on leadership.

Here's why: whoever slung the mud, or dug up the past, intends only to influence a voter's decision with emotions. BUT the intelligent voter is supposed to make a Rational Decision. That casts suspicion on the motivation of the people doing the digging AND the stuff they find.

---To all: I only intended the foul language at DaveB whose first use of it offended me. No offense to all other readers.
 
Let Davis sling his mud. I voted for the recall and for a pro-gun candidate.
 
FYI, Clinton was never impeached. A bill of charges was not brought forth by the senate
Click to expand...

<sigh>

The bill of charges which is brought by the HOUSE IS IMPEACHMENT.


After a President is impeached by the House, the Senate is required to conduct a trial and make a finding of guilty or not guilty. If the verdict is guilty, the President is removed from office.

But whether the Senate finds guilty or not, once the House votes to bring charges, the President has been impeached.


High school civics. Or just read the Constitution.


:rolleyes:



im·peach ( P ) Pronunciation Key (m-pch)
tr.v. im·peached, im·peach·ing, im·peach·es

To make an accusation against.
To charge (a public official) with improper conduct in office before a proper tribunal.
To challenge the validity of; try to discredit: impeach a witness's credibility.



For a complete discussion of the meaning of the word, including the common error of thinking that impeachment is removal from office, see Dictionary.com

Merriam-Webster online, following their long tradition of catering to the ignorant, includes the incorrect definition as a third definition.
 
So what. It's Hollywood. Only the most nieve could be surprised.

I'm sure he did more than grope. It's part of the Californai movie industry culture.
 
tyme, I think it could be argued that the Senate never held a trial. The kangaroo court that whazisname arranged certainly didn't resemble any attempt to find the truth.


But that's another thread, I suppose. :D


Oh, and bountyhunter? Nixon was never impeached. He likely would have been, but he ducked out before it got that far. There have been two Presidents impeached: Johnson and Clinton. Neither was convicted.


Johnson was one vote short of conviction.
 
Of course..... women never decline to pursue such cases to avoid the embarrassment.
Click to expand...

But if there's money involved then it's less embarassing?

Aw, who knows what the real score was on that. He admitted it tonight on the news. I know some women keep quiet when it was real abuse, but others use situations where it wasn't abuse jus to make gain in some way. All women aren't victims, some are victimizers. I don't lack sympathy or willingness to protect women, I'd nail a rapist against the wall in a second. The point is though that these women waited until now to come forth with this, coincidently when the politico's big money is flowing? Kinda discredits their credibility right off the bat in my mind.
 
I'd like to see some new poll numbers now that this story has broken, but in my fantasy world Arnold will bow out and all 40% of his support will switch to McClintock, giving us 58% McClintock. A boy can dream, I guess...
 
I'd like to hear Arnold tell how many times he's been groped by women (and more than likely men) over the past 30 years. The media won't report that 'cause everybody knows only men are pigs.
 
deliberately offensive DaveB

Let me see if I understand.

I used a fairly common phrase that contains a bad word, and I'm offensive.

Others here use words such as traitor, stupid, sheep, idiot, scum, moron, etc to describe people with whom they have political disagreements, and discuss their own joyful anticipation of their deaths, and those are not offensive?

At least my BS detector is still working.

db
 
If you are referring to my comment about Clinton being a traitor, well, I guess that just shows your own willful ignorance. There is more than enough evidence of his treason to convince any reasonable person, just on the public record.

Of course, maybe you don't consider it treason to transfer secret military technology to a country that has stated its intention to engage us in war and defeat us.


That would be a typical liberal viewpoint.
 
My comments were directed to the poster who took me to task for using a bad word. Quartus, I don't really disagree with your use of the word.

If BC was a traitor (in the legal, not political, sense), then he's a traitor.

When the word traitor is used carelessly or recklessly, then I consider that useage to be offensive. Specifically, the people who oppose W and his unconstitutional and illegal actions are "the opposition".

They are not "traitors" - at least not until W can get hisself crowned.

db
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

K
  • Locked
Kali: Riordan OUT of Gov race
Replies
4
Views
443
Bruce H
B
C
  • Locked
Schwarzenegger-typical Hollwood hypocrite
Replies
14
Views
1K
Malone LaVeigh
M
R
  • Locked
Democrat Spokesman Warns Of 'real Bullets' Against Arnold Schwarzenegger
2
Replies
28
Views
1K
Standing Wolf
S
J
  • Locked
Recall confusing and chaotic
Replies
5
Views
487
Silver Bullet
S
R
  • Locked
Schwarzenegger gaining GOP support
Replies
2
Views
416
rick_reno
R
Back
Top