Scope Comparison

Status
Not open for further replies.

Yamavira

Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Messages
84
Location
NE England. Co. Durham. Land of the Prince Bishops
Looking at a Redfield Revenge 3-9x42 or 4-12x42 plex reticle
OR Weaver 40/44 model 3-10x44 plex reticle.

My question. Which has the better optics ????.
Neither are expensive scopes so perhaps there is no noticeable difference.
Would welcome any comments.

Going to mount it on my Tikke 6.5x55 SE for deer.
Thanks
yamavira.
 
I have a redfield 2-7 on my deer rifle. I think the glass is clear and is a nice hunting scope. Never used a weaver so I can't say which is better. I am happy with my redfield and do not plan on putting another scope on it.
 
I have no idea about the Weaver, but the Redfield "Revolution" scopes are one of the better scopes in the $200 price range. A much better scope than the "Revenge" and only a little more.

In that price range the Burris Fullfield II is another winner.
 
I've looked through the Redfields, side-by-side with Leupold. Glass was reasonable but the Redfield's variable eye-relief was the stuff of $50 scopes, there must have been an 1 1/4" difference while zooming. I cannot picture myself wanting one at any price. YMMV.
 
I own 3 Nikons, the oldest has been re-mounted on 4 different rifles and they are an absolute steal for budget glass. My lone Sightron S1 has seen 4 years of use on two muzzleloaders, an -06 and a pair of rimfires. Always clear and bright with solid and repeatable adjustments while working up loads or changing yardage. My go to scope for testing new rifles.

Of the two mentioned by the OP, I'd still vote Weaver every day and twice on Sunday unless other options were available.
 
In the past we have had great results with the Weaver V series made in Japan. I would recommend one of those, but a really good scope is the VX2 3X9. If you are going with Leupold go for the VX2 or 3 because their adjustment knobs are superior to the vx1/redfield design. I have never bought a 10/44
 
Fella's;

I've bought a fair amount of glass in my years, everything from Chinese Tasco to Zeiss. With extremely few exceptions you get what you pay for. With that said, let's take a look at the O.P.'s situation.

He's hunting in New England, and using a 6.5 Swede, a cartridge I've got a lot of history with also. However, I'm in darkest Outer Montana & he's got more and thicker vegetation. Although he didn't give us a budget number, the choices he's posted would seem to indicate that the budget is around $200.00 I'd think. Considering the vegetation issues, and recalling conversations with people in New Hampshire who hunt, 200 yards would be a long shot, with most game taken in the 50 to 100 yard range.

If the O.P. agrees with me about the conditions, I'd think that 7 or 8 power on the top end would be entirely sufficient. Although if the better value were a 3-9X, I'd say go for it. And that brings me to the Vortex Diamondback 3-9X x 40mm that SWFA is showing for sale at the cost of $189.95 plus shipping. Which should bring the total cost to right about on the budget figure I mentioned earlier. Vortex is very decent glass for the money. In my opinion they now occupy the place that Sightron did ten years ago.

There's nothing wrong with a Japanese Weaver, but I'm not sure where the various scopes in their product line are built anymore. If the Classic V were Japanese the the 40/44's were Chinese, I know which one I'd buy & which I'd avoid. A 2-7 Leupold VX-2 is a helluva good scope, but would seem to be out of his price range. If I were shopping in the 350-400 range I'd also be looking at the Weaver Grand Slams and most particularly the Nikon Monarch 2.5-10X with the mil-dot reticle. I've got a fair amount of Nikon glass & am also really sold on the mil-dot system.

900F
 
Scope

Good Afternoon
Thank you for the responses to my query. Much appreciated.
Summation of my requirements here in the NE UK was spot on.
Tidying up one of my cupboards I came across a Redfield 5Star scope 3-9x40 with simple reticle. Remember buying it decades ago. Still in its box. Looks good & optics clear. Going to mount it on the Tikka & try it out on the range first. Think it will be out in the field soon.

Cheers
Yamavira.:)
 
Yamavira;

My apologies, sir. Got to readin' just a little too fast & mistook North East (NE) England for the U.S.'s New England.

Congratulations on the find, that's gotta feel good! The only fly that might be found in the ointment could be in low light conditions. I've no doubt that modern glass, with it's superior coatings, will give you the clearer image during the first few minutes of daylight or dusk's last gleaming. Given that you're not comparing the Redfield to today's bottom-of-the-barrel bargain glass.

900F
 
I have 2 Redfield Revenge scopes 3-9x42. And 3 Nikon Prostaff 3-9x40. Also I have a Vortex Crossfire 2 3-9x40.

These are all mounted on hunting guns and hold zero 100% reliably. Once I zero my scopes I don't touch them so I can't speak to adjustment repeatability. However of all these scopes I have only had one issue and that was with the Vortex Crossfire. I sent it in which I had to pay shipping, and it was repaired and now works perfectly.

My scope clarity test is looking at a Church's sign that is ~ 500yds away from my driveway it has different size lettering. The letter sizes range from, what I'll call sizes 1-4, during hunting season I'll look at that sign at 6:00 am and 6 pm.

Letter size 1 being largest and 4 being smallest.
Redfield Revenge I can see sizes 1-4 most of the time.
Nikon Prostaff I can see size 1-3 all the time.
Vortex Crossfire I can see size 1-2 all the time.

The Redfield is the clearest of them all and at $149.99 vs $179.99 for the Nikon I'll choose Redfield every time.
 
Redfield 5Star scope 3-9x40 with simple reticle.
I have a 5 Star 6X18 and it is a nice scope. It served me well on a varmint gun. I never tested it in low light conditions, but I would think it should do reasonably well. (At least at 6X anyway.)

Nice find.
 
Another option you might consider is the Nitrex scope. Made in Japan, very similar to the Weaver Grand Slam models. I have one on a Marlin X7 in .270 Win., and find it to be very close to my Leupold VX-2 and not far behind my Zeiss Conquest, all of them being 3-9x. The Nitrex is a little heavier than the Leupold. I also can recommend the Burris Fullfield II and the Redfield Revolution, since I have a couple of each. IMO, the Nitrex is a step above the Nikon Prostaff, the Redfield and the Burris. And you would save enough to buy really nice rings and bases or ammo.
http://www.natchezss.com/Optics.cfm...2mm Rifle Scope Matte Finish TrexPlex Reticle
 
In the "inexpensive" price range my eyes like the Nikon Prostaff scopes. I want to try this Sightron SI scope. I really like its SIII big brother I have.
Walk, I have that scope in 4-12x. It's decent enough. On par with my burris ff2, and not as good as my vortex diamondback.


also, +1 on the nitrex. way better scope than the other 2 options. I have 2. heck, natchexss even has come weaver classic V's sub 150 time to time if you want a brand still in existence.
 
Redfield Revolution on my 30-06 and a Leupold VX-1 on my .243. Both scopes are in the $200-$250 range. I'd buy either again. My eyes like both of these. Both times I went shopping I started our looking for a Nikon, but the Redfield and the Leupold just seem clearer and have better eye relief for me. I have nothing against Nikon, and I know lots of folks that love their Nikons.

-Jeff
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top