DigitalWarrior
Member
I am almost afraid to ask this question because of the ridicule that will probably be heaped upon me.
If the following is true: Bush is 62% evil. Kerry is 88% Evil. The LP has no chance of winning the presidency.
Then what can I do to show that being "only" 62% evil is unacceptable.
I understand that Kerry is worse for most things that I love, but Bush still appears to be awful. I am afraid of giving consent to all of the things that he has done that I despise.
I do not want to try to prove why I think that Bush is 62% evil. I don't want to hear what will happen if Kerry is elected. I don't want to hear about the LP. I just want to know what to do when the lesser of two evils is still mad crazy evil.
I have asked similar questions before, but the thread always gets dragged into the mud. I am hoping to avoid that this time. Lets stick to THR.
If the following is true: Bush is 62% evil. Kerry is 88% Evil. The LP has no chance of winning the presidency.
Then what can I do to show that being "only" 62% evil is unacceptable.
I understand that Kerry is worse for most things that I love, but Bush still appears to be awful. I am afraid of giving consent to all of the things that he has done that I despise.
I do not want to try to prove why I think that Bush is 62% evil. I don't want to hear what will happen if Kerry is elected. I don't want to hear about the LP. I just want to know what to do when the lesser of two evils is still mad crazy evil.
I have asked similar questions before, but the thread always gets dragged into the mud. I am hoping to avoid that this time. Lets stick to THR.