Should I use .45 FMJ or HP?

Status
Not open for further replies.

thriftyjoe

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2009
Messages
121
I haven't got it figured out.

What is best for home defense, .45 FMJ or HP?

With a standard Glock H&K or XD in the 45 caliber, what should my mags be loaded with?

please elaborate on how many grains, stopping power, penetration, velocity.
 
I haven't got it figured out.

What is best for home defense, .45 FMJ or HP?

With a standard Glock H&K or XD in the 45 caliber, what should my mags be loaded with?

please elaborate on how many grains, stopping power, penetration, velocity.
1.This is just my opinion. There is no such thing as knockdown power. If there was you would be knocked down shooting it.

2. Unless you totally shut down the central nervous system with a direct brain obliteration or spinal cord severance your attacker is going to keep coming and never realize he has been shot for at least several seconds.

3. Penetration, expansion of bullets is in the eyes of the beholder. IMHO any projectile going at over 800 a second is going to cause injury and trauma to human soft tissue and cause it to leak. The more the holes the faster the leaking. 12 Gauge 00 does the job real quick!
 
JHP will create a larger wound track, more trauma and bleeding; thus, having a greater potential of ending the threat faster.
 
With a .45 bore, I don't really think it matters much. I bet an FMJ will drop em just the same. However, if your gun feeds JHPs well, theres not much reason not to use them. 230g either way.
 
JHP for sure, I like Federal HST the best, but Speer Gold Dot, Remington Golden Saber, Winchester Ranger-T or PDX1, Hornady XTP, the Barnes XPB bullet, which is loaded by several companies, the most prominent is probably Cor-Bon with their DPX line, these are all great bullets that work very well. The XTP doesn't expand quite as much as the others, but it penetrates well and is known for being one of the most accurate bullet designs available.

Pretty much any duty-oriented JHP load from a reputable manufacturer will do just fine. If I were carrying a .45 it has been loaded with 230+P HST, but the standard pressure version is just as good.
 
JHP is safer inside a home if it expands at all.

230 grain FMJ-RN won't slow down much, even if it went through two skinny little druggys stacked prison lover style.

rc
 
I agree with all the previous posts--hollow points are the way to go. Experiment with Speer, Hornady, etc until you find a round that your piece likes to eat the best. Personally, my M&P likes Golden Sabre.
Save the FMJ for range work.
 
Remington Golden Sabres have worked in every gun I have ever owned. That said I carry Gold dot. It is a little more accurate for me and just as reliable. I like the 230gr bullet. Can't go wrong with a 185gr +P though.
 
What is best for home defense, .45 FMJ or HP?

Home defense...for me in a situation where interior walls are made of sheet rock and even exterior walls can be thin a JHP makes good sense. This allows for an extra bit of security against an errant shot hitting something you don't want it to.

tipoc
 
For maximum reliability (some autos don't feed all hps with certainty and few would argue that hardball isn't the standard for dependable feeding for most semi-autos) and maximum penetration (when getting past heavy outer clothing or reinforced barriers, for instance, could be issues), fmj (especially in .45 caliber where expansion is not as important as it might be in a lesser caliber) might be the best choice.

Of course, many autos are entirely reliable using hps and extreme penetration could be a liability when shooting inside a residence. One has to decide the question based on their own particular circumstance. To say that a hp bullet is the best option for all possible self-defense scenarios seems a bit too exclusive to me.
 
As I'm fond of saying, a .45 JHP, even if it doesn't expand, will still make a .45-caliber hole. If it does expand it will make an even bigger hole. I want all the advantages I can get. There is no reason not to take advantage of it in modern guns like yours, designed from the outset to feed JHPs. Remember that it will often take more than one hole.
 
Thank you all for the suggestions.

The things that gets me most is i live in a city and dont want my neighbors complaining about their broken chandeliers (or worse)
in addition HP seems to be reliable so it's the best pick
 
As I'm fond of saying, a .45 JHP, even if it doesn't expand, will still make a .45-caliber hole. If it does expand it will make an even bigger hole.
There is no reason not to take advantage of it in modern guns like yours, designed from the outset to feed JHPs.
There's your answer.
Pick a commercial JHP round that feeds reliably (yes, you will have to do your own damn testing) and load them up.
NOTHING is a death-ray, you still have to shoot competently, but there's no reason to make the holes you do manage to make be nice & neat.

As mentioned above, a HP round that doesn't expand is just a funny-shaped ball round.
Add in that personal defense ammo tends to have better materials, nice slippery casings, and better quality control, and loading up with ball just seems silly, unless you're shooting an antique that won't feed HP (and there isn't much I've found that doesn't like Gold Dots, but then fo-five isn't my caliber of expertise)
 
JHP is safer inside a home if it expands at all.

230 grain FMJ-RN won't slow down much, even if it went through two skinny little druggys stacked prison lover style.

rc
Sorry but I am just not buying this statement either. A 185 grn hot Corbon JHP is going through a lot more that a low pressure 230 FMJ.
 
Thank you all for the suggestions.

The things that gets me most is i live in a city and dont want my neighbors complaining about their broken chandeliers (or worse)
in addition HP seems to be reliable so it's the best pick
The John Moses Browning design of the 1911A1 was never intended for hollow point ammunition, only round nose bullets that he also expressly designed for the 1911A1. Did you know he also invented the .25 caliber center fire cartridge as well.
 
A 185 grn hot Corbon JHP is going through a lot more that a low pressure 230 FMJ.

Not if the material it is going through is animal tissue. A round, heavier, longer bullet that doesn't deform will penetrate probably twice as deep as the Cor-Bon 185+P, Cor-Bon is really fond of bullets that fragment and don't pentrate particularly well. If we are talking about sheets of steel or glass, than you are probably right.


Browning also developed the .32 ACP and the .380 ACP, and I believe the .38 Auto as well. Can't remember if the 9x20mm Browning Long is another name for the .38 Auto, don't think it is.
 
When talking about velocities in the 800 to 1000 (maybe) fps range, talk about expansion and "knockdown" are nice hot stove topics, but........... Trading penetration for (maybe) expansion with no enhanced performance, especially having answered the demand to go to a lighter bullet to get it, is likely to be counterproductive in this velocity range. Recently a friend engaged a very large porcupine with somebody's 200 grain hollow points at the top of very large apple tree, range perhaps 15 yds. Three witnessed center of mass hits had the porky sick but still upright on the limb and holding on. I asked for the gun and disrupted the porky's central nervous system forward, whereupon he hit the ground like a sack of.....sand. My friend was amazed. He's a good shot and he shot COM deliberately to see the dramatic effect of his hollowpoints. I shot for the CNS because I'm old and don't want to see even a fat porky suffer, even though I wonder why considering what they do to dogs. It was a watershed example for him. For me, I'm old and it suggested a paraphrase with apologies to the great late Bill Jordan: "I'll take my hardball, or better yet Hornady full jacket flat point 230's... You can take your chances." The .45 ACP didn't build its almost 100 year reputation with anybody's bucketmouth hollowpoints or underweight bullets of any other kind.
 
The .380 ACP cartridge was designed by John Moses Browning for early blowback pistols which lacked a barrel locking mechanism. The locking mechanism that is found on most other pistols is not necessary for the .380 because of the round's low breech pressure when fired. It is still the favorite cartridge in Europe for police and counties with ammunition restrictions. That's why they are in such short supply. 9mm Kurz is how they are identified. The James Bond movies and the famous Walther PPK he carried increased their popularity in the USA.
 
When talking about velocities in the 800 to 1000 (maybe) fps range, talk about expansion and "knockdown" are nice hot stove topics, but........... Trading penetration for (maybe) expansion with no enhanced performance, especially having answered the demand to go to a lighter bullet to get it, is likely to be counterproductive in this velocity range. Recently a friend engaged a very large porcupine with somebody's 200 grain hollow points at the top of very large apple tree, range perhaps 15 yds. Three witnessed center of mass hits had the porky sick but still upright on the limb and holding on. I asked for the gun and disrupted the porky's central nervous system forward, whereupon he hit the ground like a sack of.....sand. My friend was amazed. He's a good shot and he shot COM deliberately to see the dramatic effect of his hollowpoints. I shot for the CNS because I'm old and don't want to see even a fat porky suffer, even though I wonder why considering what they do to dogs. It was a watershed example for him. For me, I'm old and it suggested a paraphrase with apologies to the great late Bill Jordan: "I'll take my hardball, or better yet Hornady full jacket flat point 230's... You can take your chances." The .45 ACP didn't build its almost 100 year reputation with anybody's bucketmouth hollowpoints or underweight bullets of any other kind.
There is no such thing as "Knockdown" if there was it would knock you down shooting it. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction...simple physics.

From what I read and studied about the 1911A1 .45 weapon it was designed to be shot, reloaded and cocked from a horse with one hand. There have been articles that Browning never intended the slow round as a "Killer " round but more of a wounding round. That way it would take 3 men out of the fight. The one shot with it and two to carry him off the battlefield. The West Point Library has some real good papers on this.
 
Pappy109 said:
A 185 grn hot Corbon JHP is going through a lot more that a low pressure 230 FMJ.
Not necessarily, if we're talking about living tissue. The light fast round, with its large HP cavity, will (hopefully) expand violently and penetrate less in a body, reducing the chance of a through-and-through penetration hitting a bystander. Hitting other objects may be a different story.
 
JMB deigned cartridges (list does not claim to be all-inclusive):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Moses_Browning#Cartridges
Off-topic but interesting ... JMB was an innovator, one wonders if he would kept innovating or gone the arrogant route Gaston Glock went with "Glock Perfection"

James Bond movies and the famous Walther PPK he carried
was chambered in 7.65 mm Browning (aka .32acp)

wikipedia said:
Bond's weapon of choice in the beginning of Dr. No is an Italian-made Beretta 418 .25 calibre, later replaced by the German-made Walther PPK, chambered in 7.65 mm (a peculiar choice, as Valentin Zukovsky remarks in GoldenEye: the PPK as found in the U.S. and Western Europe is most commonly chambered in .380ACP). The PPK was used in every subsequent film and became his signature weapon until the ending of Tomorrow Never Dies, when Bond upgraded to the Walther P99. He has subsequently used the P99 pistol in Tomorrow Never Dies, The World Is Not Enough, Die Another Day, and Casino Royale. Strangely, Bond resumed use of the PPK in Quantum of Solace, the direct sequel of Casino Royale.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top