Redcoat3340
Member
Got a Sig 220 last week, my first .45 in a bunch of years. Then sort of fell over a S&W 4566TSW that I couldn't say "no" to.
Had the Sig out last week and wow...I was hot. (See attached first mag target at 7 yards).
So when I was cleaning up the Smith (it didn't need it at all but I was doing it out of habit for a new-to-me gun) I compared the two: damn near twins.
The Sig is a mm longer, the Smith a mm higher, the Smith seems a wee bit heavier (it's all stainless) and the triggers are practically identical both in SA and DA in terms of weight, pull, and crispness. The Smith 4566 was apparently a LEO special order as it has a decocker only (no safety), bobbed hammer, and where there should have been a rail, there isn't one...so it's a big hit for me all round.
I hope to take both to the range tomorrow (Sunday) and we'll see how they shoot side-by-side.
Had the Sig out last week and wow...I was hot. (See attached first mag target at 7 yards).
So when I was cleaning up the Smith (it didn't need it at all but I was doing it out of habit for a new-to-me gun) I compared the two: damn near twins.
The Sig is a mm longer, the Smith a mm higher, the Smith seems a wee bit heavier (it's all stainless) and the triggers are practically identical both in SA and DA in terms of weight, pull, and crispness. The Smith 4566 was apparently a LEO special order as it has a decocker only (no safety), bobbed hammer, and where there should have been a rail, there isn't one...so it's a big hit for me all round.
I hope to take both to the range tomorrow (Sunday) and we'll see how they shoot side-by-side.