(sigh) more on Kerry

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 6, 2003
Messages
2,076
Location
Bemidji, MN
> Comfortable? Have a bucket of buttered popcorn and a cold beer at
the
>ready? (If you were my friend Otto, you'd have instead a Grey Goose
>martini.) All set for the greatest political fireworks show of your
>life? Showtime is about to begin.
>
>Those SwiftVet ads, you see, have been just the prelims to warm the
>audience up. The main acts will be much more entertaining. They'll
>begin with signs appearing at Kerry campaign rallies saying:
>
>Ho, ho, ho - Kerry must sign the One-Eight-Oh
>
>What does that mean, you ask? It is the demand that Kerry sign a DOD
>(Defense Dept.) Form 180, which authorizes the release to the public
of
>all military records the Pentagon possesses on him.
>
>George Bush has released all of his, just like John McCain and Al
Gore.
>Kerry refuses. He's hiding stuff in there that destroys him, is why.
>One such record has already been leaked: The official Navy
>"after-action report" that was the basis of Kerry's being awarded the
>Silver Star. This is the key quote:
>
>PCF 94 [Kerry's Swift Boat] beached in center of ambush in front of
>small path when Viet Cong sprung up from bunker 10 feet from unit. Man
>ran with weapon towards hootch. Forward M-60 machine gunner wounded
man
>in leg. Officer-in-charge, LTjg Kerry, jumped ashore and gave pursuit
>while other units saturated area with fire and beached placing assault
>parties ashore. Kerry chased VC inland behind hootch and shot him
while
>he fled -- capturing one B-40 rocket launcher with round in chamber.
>
>
> It is impossibly insulting to anyone in the military awarded a
medal
>for bravery in battle that Kerry was given one of the highest honors
>the military can bestow - the Silver Star - for shooting a single
>wounded man while he was running away. How did Kerry engineer this?
>Only the yet-unreleased records will tell.
>
>Yet this is small potatoes to what's really in there. For starters, he
>has AWOL and performance problems that blow similar charges against
>Bush away. On February 18, 1966, Kerry signed Enlistment and Officer
>Candidate contracts for five years of active duty and reserves, plus
>one year of inactive standby reserves. On November 21, 1969, he wrote
a
>letter requesting early release from active Navy duty, lying that "my
>current regular period of obligated service (will) be completed in
>December of this year." Obviously, the true completion date was
>February 17, 1971.
>
> Nonetheless, after only three years and 18 days of active service,
on
>January 3, 1970, Kerry was transferred to the Naval Reserve Manpower
>Center in Bainbridge, Maryland. Yet Kerry has refused to release his
>Performance Records showing that he completed the 48 drills and 17
days
>of active duty per year required during his 2? years in the Ready
>Reserves. For some reason, the Democrat Party propagandists posing as
>journalists in the mainstream media have never asked about them.
>
>On July 1, 1972, Lt. John Kerry was transferred to Standby Inactive
>Status. Over 5? years later - and six years after his enlistment
>contract expired - Kerry was discharged from the US Navy on February
>16, 1978. It's not the phoniness of the medals and the after-action
>reports Kerry is hiding by refusing to sign Form 180. It's not even
his
>Reserve Duty Performance Records showing he missed as many drills as
>he's missed votes in the Senate. What he is really scared of is the
>record of his spending six years fighting an OTH - Other Than
Honorable
>- discharge.
>
> There are five classes of Discharge: Honorable, General, Other Than
>Honorable, Bad Conduct, and Dishonorable. Kerry's public activities in
>leading the Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW), including lying
>under oath, knowingly lying about alleged "atrocities" committed by
his
>fellow soldiers, meeting with North Vietnamese government officials
and
>Viet Cong leaders in Paris - all while still serving as an officer of
>the US Navy - were in direct violation of the Uniform Code of Military
>Justice
>(UCMJ), qualifying Kerry for a Dishonorable Discharge.
>
>When Kerry appealed, he was offered an OTH - Other Than Honorable - as
>a compromise. He knew even that would destroy any possible political
>career, so he continued to stay in the Reserves with further appeals
>and resubmissions for over five years, until finally, somehow and
>someway, he cajoled the military into making his discharge Honorable.
>Then and only then did he leave the Navy.
>
>The full story of how he gamed the system is in those records he won't
>release. The legal activist group, Judicial Watch
><http://www.judicialwatch.org/> , has now filed a formal complaint
><http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2004/kerryawards.htm> with the
>Pentagon demanding such release. But this is just the opening salvo.
>
> The 14th Amendment to the Constitution has five sections. Here is
>Section Three:
>
>
>No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector
>of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or
military,
>under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously
>taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United
>States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or
>judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the
>United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against
>the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress
>may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
>
>
>As Kerry took an oath to support the Constitution as a military
officer
>of the United States, and subsequently gave public and verifiable aid
>and comfort to an enemy engaged in warfare with the United States, he
>is Constitutionally disqualified to run for President (or be a Senator
>for that matter).
>
>Judicial Watch is thus preparing to file a lawsuit in federal court
>charging that Kerry's candidacy for President is a violation of the
>14th Amendment.
>
>Note, however, that last sentence in Section Three: "But Congress may
>by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability." It
>turns out there are many Republican Congressmen and Senators who are
>closet Kerry-supporters - so much so that they will be offering H.R.
>and S. Resolutions exempting Kerry from his 14th Amendment disability.
>They will stand up on the House or Senate floor and give earnest
>speeches in support of the resolution. How they will keep a straight
>face, and suppress any sign whatever of malicious glee, I have no idea
>- but that's one of the skills any politician has.
>
>So sit back and relax, folks. Have another beer (Otto - have another
>martini...). This is going to be as Ed Sullivan used to say,
>rrrreallybig, a rrrreallybig show.
>
> (Oh - did I forget to say who leaked that after-action report from
>Kerry's Pentagon files, and who will be leaking the rest by, say
>October 15, if Judicial Watch can't pry them loose first? Here's a
>clue: he's two or three cutouts away from a certain senator from New
>York who dreams of once again residing in her husband's former home.)
 
I knew about the ammendment but have yet to see a challenge. this whole thing has gone slow. what is the text from an article can you post a source its nothing to new really.

back during the clinton and chinese illegal campaign contributions kerry received money from the chinese also. neither one got in trouble though suprise suprise.

http://www.softwar.net
lots of stuff on china and kerry/clinton
 
If I were a republican congressman bent on spiking Kerry's wheels, I'd float the 14th amendment resolution. "In the spirit of bipartisanship, we are offering to remove this disabillity from that treasonous SOB and allow the will of the people to prevail." Kerry would have to fight it tooth and nail. To allow it to go forward would admit that it was necessary. He could either look like a petty brat and refuse the gesture, or accept it and look like a traitor. Win-Win for the republicans, Lose-Lose for Kerry.

Just my two cents.
 
sorry i dont know the source, i got this in an E-mail from my Brother in law who is a Major in the Army Corp of Engenieers. I'll E-mail him later and ask if he knows.
 
You can absolutely be sure that someone is pulling the strings behind the curtain!

There is more to come!
 
Is there anything that can force disclosure?

Any freedom of info act or anything like it to force these records open?
sounds like we need this to come open or Bush to mention this in the debates to make this public. "I've fully disclosed my records, what are you hiding Mr Kerry?"
 
Any freedom of info act or anything like it to force these records open?
Kerry has to sign his privacy protection away with the now infamous form 180. After that the records are subject to freedom of information requests.

Kerry will never sign the form.
 
We all know that Kerry won;t release the forms, but is it possible that other people involved don't want this coming out, either? I mean, someone is responsible for the above mentioned. Is it likely that other politicians or high profile people are involved in this?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top