Sized .223 brass will not chamber in AR

Status
Not open for further replies.
because SAAMI does not have a definition for cartridge case headspace, let us invent that definition. Let us call the distance between base and shoulder mating surface on the cartridge case, "cartridge case headspace".

You know 20 years from now I'm going to credit that term to both of us . I've been saying case headspace since late 2014 . Not sure how long you've been saying cartridge head space but I'd bet BartB has been saying them both longer then both of us ;)

The other term I use and not sure if it's been used since the beginning but I don't here it often or ever is .

Excessive head clearance instead of the more widely used excessive headspace .
 
I load 5 rounds in my M1A and fire them as normal. Average velocity was about 2645 FPS and I saved the 5 cases. I then loaded another 5 rounds and turned the gas system off on the rifle. I fired those 5 rounds manually cycling the rifle for each round. I saved those 5 cases. My average velocity gained about 50 FPS so nothing exciting there. However, when I measured the 10 spent cases they all measured identical right down to 0.001", every case measured 1.635" so each case grew 0.005" whether the cases were manually cycles or semi-auto cycled they came out the same. Not what I expected and not in line with what you mentioned. Got any theory?

The remaining 10 rounds went through my bolt gun and went in at 1.630" and came out at 1.632" all here nor there but why were all the M1A cases the same with the gas on or off? Anyone?

I hope no more of this is posted because it will blow my theory all to heck. :banghead:

All my M1a's are match rifles with the gas system disabled. The gunsmith I use does it the old AMU method, drilling screws through the gas cylinder to hold the the upper ferrule to the gas cylinder. Personally, I recommend welding those two together. But, never disabled my gas system on either a M1a or a AR15.

Size those cases and try again. On the first firing, my cases all grew to max trim length, and around reload three to five, only required 0.001" or 0.002" trimming. Maybe something will show up once those cases are fired again in the same rifle.

By the way, I lubed my M1a cases and was able to shoot them 23 times without a single case head separation. Your dry cases, five to eight reloads is what shooters typically got before the case heads came off. You want to spend more money, run them dry, and use your cases up quick.

These are cases fired in my M1a and fired as lubricated rounds. I either left the RCBS case lube on them and primed them that way, or I put on Johnson paste wax on the loaded cases with my fingers. I don’t like the feel of greasy cases and if I had time between matches I would wash the cases to remove the RCBS lube and then apply paste wax. . If I did not have time I fired the cases just as they came out of the die, minus whatever lube that was lost in handling. I never had a primer dud. I ran a number of experiments with various lubes; leaving thick coatings of grease is objectionable as grease particles are in the air after firing. I had 1000 rounds of CAVIM and I fired most of them in a FAL. FAL’s are very hard on brass and I experimented with stick wax. This is a tenuous grease used to lubricate saw teeth. I dropped lumps of stick wax in a bag with handfuls of CAVIM and shook vigorously. Both case and bullets were unevenly coated with globs of stick wax. When I fired this stuff it was as if a grease bomb went off: the mechanism and myself became coated in stick wax. My shooting glasses had to be frequently cleaned, my hands were greasy, my clothes were greasy, overall, it was messy. Later I spent hours wiping the cases to reduce the amount of stick wax.

So, I prefer thin coatings and after all the handling that occurs after sizing, after trimming, after priming, after dumping the powder and seating the bullet, the amount of RCBS case lube left does not leave objectionable residue in the mechanism or eyeglasses.

At Camp Perry in cold weather I had bolt over rides with some of my Johnson paste waxed rounds. This ended when I polished the rounds. Previous to that I shot the rounds with swirls and gobs of paste wax but that caused sluggish round rise in the magazine in cold weather. From then on I polished my rapid fire rounds and have never had a bolt close on an empty chamber even in rapid fires sequences in snow.

I have tried various lubes, paste wax takes the most time to apply but is the most satisfactory for handling. Paste wax dries hard, it is easy to wipe off dirt if you drop a round, and it is cheap.

I tried wire pulling wax, bought a bottle at Home Depot, works but not as hard as paste wax.

http://www.shop3m.com/wire-pulling-lubricant-wax.html

Sometimes I left Kiwi Mink Oil on the cases.

The picture below are of sectioned cases, R stands for reloaded, R5 five times reloaded, etc, all of these cases the shoulder was set back about 0.003” and the cases fired in my M1a. I do not visually see any evidence of case wall thinning from those cases reloaded 5 times (6 times fired) , R18, or R22. As long as the case is not excessively stretched during firing or extraction, there is no reason for the sidewalls to thin.

The FAL cases are from a Bud’s rifle. I think they were separating after 2 or 3 three firings, FAL’s are hard on brass.

DSCN1978CasesbesidesFNcases.jpg


DSCN1969CasesR5toR18.jpg

DSCN1973CasesR18toR22.jpg

DSCN1967.jpg

DSCN1979Historyofreloads.jpg
 
I don't have a 308 semi yet but the testing I've done with my AR's has shown full power/pressure 5.56 loads expand completely and I get very constant cartridge case headspace measurements . How ever when shooting 223 Rem ammo out of my AR's the cartridge case headspace is very inconsistent . I believe that's because they lack the pressure to both blow the shoulder forward while at the same time stretching the web forcing the head back against the bolt face . This results in inconsistent fire formed cases .

My thinking is the M1A is firing full pressure loads expanding the cases completely . Even if the bolt was to unlock and there in still 600 to 1000 PSI left over in the chamber . I don't see that little a pressure blowing out the cases enough to change the measurement .

I should add that all that is me just thinking out loud based on measurements I've taken in the last few years .
 
Slamfire, thanks for the much appreciated comments. Soon as the weather warm up I'll be back at it. Unfortunately I only devoted 10 rounds to the experiment last summer. I did take note as to your mention of the case lube and when I give this another shot I plan to leave lube or actually RCBS lube the cases. Wish there was an easy way to try this on my AR10, the M1A was convenient as turning off the gas was simple as turning a screw. :) What I got just surprised me because I agree with your thinking and that same thinking is shared by several more articles I have read. Now being a fair weather type I just need some warm nice days, NE Ohio is not a thrill about now and working through snow to post targets is no longer fun for me, once yes but not now.

Metal_God, thanks also for your comments. I guess I could do some experiments in 223 Remington with one of several AR 15 guns I have. This stuff just fascinates me.

<EDIT> One more note, on my .308 Win brass that I shoot in the M1A or AR10. I load my brass 4 times and it's tossed. I have shot some till I had split necks or head separations but only as part of experiments. </EDIT>

Again, many thanks for the inputs as they are very much appreciated.

Ron
 
Last edited:
one thing you should have is a case gage, it will save you a lot of trouble.
 
because SAAMI does not have a definition for cartridge case headspace, let us invent that definition. Let us call the distance between base and shoulder mating surface on the cartridge case, "cartridge case headspace".

You know 20 years from now I'm going to credit that term to both of us . I've been saying case headspace since late 2014 . Not sure how long you've been saying cartridge head space but I'd bet BartB has been saying them both longer then both of us

The other term I use and not sure if it's been used since the beginning but I don't here it often or ever is .

Excessive head clearance instead of the more widely used excessive headspace
.

I have no idea how long I have been using the term "cartridge case headspace". Been using it in conjunction with cartridge headspace gauge for a very long time. I understand what I am talking about. And, so do the manufacturers of the case gauges. There has been pattern of posts from one particular person, when I use the term "cartridge headspace gauge", or "cartridge headspace", this poster has made a career of claiming that there is no such thing as cartridge headspace and then launches off into one of his nauseating, narcissistic, soliloquies of self love. You will recognize Mr "How Great I Art" by his muddled style and by the basic theme he does not need chamber gauges, he does not need cartridges gauges, he is just so clever he needs them not. And he has datums. ”I’ve got datums, jolly, jolly, datums, I’ve got datums to last me all my life”. I personally think his addled posts are the result of embalming fluid eating the synapses of his brain, and because of his hazy, muddled thinking, it was only until recently that I found his claims that cartridges don’t have headspace are based on the fact that SAAMI does not have a definition for cartridge headspace! SAAMI does not have a definition for the Moon either, so I guess that does not exist either. Discussions about chamber headspace, sizing, and cartridge headspace are a trigger for his self expressions of wonderfulness, and personally, I am tired of reading his Narcissistic posts, which are of no value to anyone but his mirror.

I do want to say the while Reloadron has a problem that I don’t understand, I don’t consider it invalidating my contention and observation that for gas guns, fired cases do not provide an accurate means of determining chamber headspace. I have reamer cut gages, Wilson gages, and it is evident that the residual blowback effect is real, and it balloons fired cases. The theory and operation of automatic mechanisms will be found in Vol IV of LTC Chinn’s books: the Machine Gun. To be found, free, here:
http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/ref/MG/ LTC Chinn did us a wonderful service by collecting and presenting so much information on gun design. I recommend everyone read the section on blow back weapons first, then go into what ever chapters you wish. Chinn explains in such a non technical fashion that it is very easy to understand the concepts. Residual blowback effect is real, it is used by gas gun designers, you can find it in the book, and it explains why fired cases are distorted at unlock.
 
I have no idea how long I have been using the term "cartridge case headspace". Been using it in conjunction with cartridge headspace gauge for a very long time. I understand what I am talking about. And, so do the manufacturers of the case gauges. There has been pattern of posts from one particular person, when I use the term "cartridge headspace gauge", or "cartridge headspace", this poster has made a career of claiming that there is no such thing as cartridge headspace and then launches off into one of his nauseating, narcissistic, soliloquies of self love. You will recognize Mr "How Great I Art" by his muddled style and by the basic theme he does not need chamber gauges, he does not need cartridges gauges, he is just so clever he needs them not. And he has datums. ”I’ve got datums, jolly, jolly, datums, I’ve got datums to last me all my life”. I personally think his addled posts are the result of embalming fluid eating the synapses of his brain, and because of his hazy, muddled thinking, it was only until recently that I found his claims that cartridges don’t have headspace are based on the fact that SAAMI does not have a definition for cartridge headspace! SAAMI does not have a definition for the Moon either, so I guess that does not exist either. Discussions about chamber headspace, sizing, and cartridge headspace are a trigger for his self expressions of wonderfulness, and personally, I am tired of reading his Narcissistic posts, which are of no value to anyone but his mirror.

I've been waiting patiently for Mr. Feeler Gauge himself to show up in this thread. He's way past due.
 
fired cases do not provide an accurate means of determining chamber headspace.
This is true of gas operated rifles.
Sightly off the beaten track but paralleling the concept and relationship of "cartridge headspace" and chamber dimensions, I will offer the example of my custom 6.5-300WSM - a Remington 700. In order to be able to properly set my FL sizing die right off, I made a chamber cast with non-shrink chamber casting material (http://www.brownells.com/gunsmith-t...ls/cerrosafe-for-chamber-casts-prod39539.aspx) from Brownell's. The case, combined with the use of RCBS Precision Mic for .300 WSM, I was able to know exactly what the relationship was of the .300WSM brass fired in my Browning A-Bolt and adjust my 6.5-.300WSM sizing die the set the shoulder back .002" and neck the fired cases down at the same time. (As a bonus, I also know what the leade looks like, too.)

Maybe a chamber cast might tell you what you need to know about your situation? Just a polite suggestion.
 
Purchased a set of small base dies over the weekend, and have case gage coming in the mail. Not going to do any resizing until I get the gage. I just really want to see what was going on before I use the new dies.

I reread my original post this morning. I realized my original wording was quite misleading, guess I was still frustrated from the night before. The case always chambered, but you could not eject it with the charging handle it was so tight. I see that my original post said that it would not chamber completely which led everyone down the headspace road. Very tight, and not able to eject would have been a better description of what was going on.

Thanks for the replies.

-Jeff
 
If the charging handle will not eject it, the bolt may not be fully locked. This is also a indication that the brass is not sized properly. Your close but not quite there. Your probably setting right at the min so another 0.001"-0.002" will make it go.

I had a similar issue with my 458 SOCOM. If it's just 0.001" above my Sherdain (cutout) gauge it will not chamber. Letting the bolt fly with full power of the Buffer spring would chamber a round. But it required a hammer to eject it if you did not fire it. A bad set of dies will drive you nuts. I also had a shell plate that was out of spec for my LNL-AP that would not allow the brass to be sized enough. It was off 0.005" too thick over the rest of my shell plates. Hornady sent me a new one. With a AR you should be able to drop the round in the chamber and push the bolt close with your fingers easily with the upper open.

Your shell holder should be 0.125" tall, base to base of brass. This is a std that all use. There are competition shell holders that vary off this for fine tuning.
 
you should be able to drop the round in the chamber and push the bolt close with your fingers easily with the upper open.

Yep, with just a little "snap" as the extractor hops over the rim.
 
I had the same problem, I did not trim my die to fix it though, I set my die a little lower on the press so only takes 3/4 of a stroke to size it. This caused my cases to come out .002" smaller at the base and they then cycled fine. The other solution is to use a small base sizing die.
 
Well A hate to say it Buuuuuut . You can always use a feeler gauge :eek: to lift the case in the shell holder resulting in sizing further down the case body .
k441.jpg

I'll add it's not what I'd recommend if most of the cases have the issue . It's time consuming to place the gauge in there every time . Before getting competition shell holders I used feeler gauges to get those stubborn cases to size down a tad more . Usually something like less then ten cases out of 100 would not get the shoulder set back of the .002 I wanted . Lifting up the case in the shell holder 1 or 2 thousandths would bump the shoulder back a little more giving me that .002 bump .
 
Last edited:
@ Bartojc. I had problems sizing 223 as well I set up a tool head with both sb and fl dies . And run them through my Dillon case trimmer all at the same time . It works very well for me .....Just my two bits
 
Last edited:
As a follow up to this thread. Over the weekend i purchased a case gage, and a set of small base dies. Dropped the previously sized cases into the case gage and they all are fine. I topped at 24 cases, but headspace and trim length are fine.

The SB dies are squeezing the diameter ever so slightly. Must be enough to allow me to eject the case. Still not sure why original dies did not work ? Chamber must be tight or whatever. I know I'm not the first to need SB dies, but there seems to be a lot of hate for them. Either way I'm a believer and on to loading some test rounds.

-Jeff
 
I don't think it's so much a matter of people hating them as it is people feeling that a lot of reloaders immediately jump to SB dies when they have problems with their rounds chambering when the problem is most often poor die setup or operator error.
Your case is different in that you tried other remedies, you obviously know how to set up your dies and you were willing to listen to suggestions before jumping right on the SB die bandwagon.
Glad you were able to fix the problem.
 
Agreeing with tcoz I don't see a lot of hate for small base dies. As I mentioned earlier I have them in 308 Winchester and in 223 Remington. I have not had to use them for any of my rifles. Some feel they overwork the brass and shorten case life. I really can't say by how much. I reload my brass for my semi-automatic rifles 4X and it's gone. All that matters is you now have a combination that works for you. :)

Ron
 
I just primed a batch of Lake City 5.56 that is now on its FIFTH priming.

I notice all the primers going in with a lot less resistance than brass with fewer firings.
I'm hoping this lot won't self-eject the primers on firing.
Either way, this the lot's last curtain call before the recycler.
 
I set my die a little lower on the press so only takes 3/4 of a stroke to size it. This caused my cases to come out .002" smaller at the base and they then cycled fine. The other solution is to use a small base sizing die.
This statement worries me.

Setting a die deep so you are not using the full stroke of the press linkage for the final 'push' will cause more difficult sizing.

And it will provide different results from case to case because there is no mechanical precise 'stopping' point other then how hard you jump on the handle.

The other thing is, the case cannot go any further in the die this way then it could go in the die with the die adjusted properly to take full advantage of the press linkage power.

If I were you, I would Stop Doing That!!
Because it isn't doing what you apparently think it is doing.

rc
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top