Gtscotty
Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2007
- Messages
- 3,635
Hey, this is my first thread, so I'm gonna go ahead and apologize in case I do something wrong.
Anyway, I was perusing wikipedia for interesting gun information when I stumbled over this on the page devoted to SKS's:
"Because of the massive size of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, over 800 million Chinese SKS rifles were produced during their 20 years of use making the Chinese SKS the most mass produced military rifle of all time."
I found this interesting, because I have always heard that the AK-47 and its variants were produced in the highest numbers of any firearm. Also, the number seems a bit high to me, (I had always heard 50-70 million AKs produced), I could be flat out wrong on this though. One thing is for sure, anyway you cut it, 800 million is quite a large production number for a firearm, especially one that has a milled receiver. I figured I'd toss that out there to see if anyone has any information as to its accuracy. Wikipedia is definitely not infallible, but on the other hand, I could not find any info countering their statement. Any one know?
Anyway, I was perusing wikipedia for interesting gun information when I stumbled over this on the page devoted to SKS's:
"Because of the massive size of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, over 800 million Chinese SKS rifles were produced during their 20 years of use making the Chinese SKS the most mass produced military rifle of all time."
I found this interesting, because I have always heard that the AK-47 and its variants were produced in the highest numbers of any firearm. Also, the number seems a bit high to me, (I had always heard 50-70 million AKs produced), I could be flat out wrong on this though. One thing is for sure, anyway you cut it, 800 million is quite a large production number for a firearm, especially one that has a milled receiver. I figured I'd toss that out there to see if anyone has any information as to its accuracy. Wikipedia is definitely not infallible, but on the other hand, I could not find any info countering their statement. Any one know?