Smith & Wesson is evidently doing pretty well...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
Smith & Wesson Reports Third Quarter Financial Results
Tuesday March 8, 4:15 pm ET
- Year-Over-Year Net Sales Growth of 13.4%; Firearms Growth of 22.5%

SPRINGFIELD, Mass., March 8 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Smith & Wesson Holding Corp. (Amex: SWB - News), the legendary 153-year old firearms maker, today announced its financial results for the third fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2005.

Sales for the three months ended January 31, 2005 were $31.1 million, a 13.4% increase over sales of $27.4 million for the comparable quarter in fiscal 2004. Firearms sales, the Company's core business, posted year-over-year quarterly growth of 22.5%. Net loss for the quarter was $32,658, or $.00 per diluted share, compared with a net loss of $1.7 million, or $.06 per diluted share, for the comparable quarter in fiscal 2004.

For the nine months ended January 31, 2005, net product sales were $88.0 million, a $2.9 million, or 3.4%, increase over the nine months ended January 31, 2004. Firearms sales were $80.3 million, a $7.6 million, or 10.5%, increase over the comparable period in fiscal 2004. Net income for the nine months ended January 31, 2005 was $3.7 million, or $.11 per diluted share, compared with a net loss of $450,696, or $.01 per diluted share, for the comparable period in fiscal 2004.

Michael Golden, President and Chief Executive Officer, said, "I am pleased with our sales performance for the quarter, particularly the increase in our pistol sales. We responded to this growth with a number of initiatives, including a transition early in the quarter to a seven-day workweek and improvements in our manufacturing processes. We began to see the positive impact of those changes in our January results. We will now focus on continuing to improve our manufacturing processes and our marketing and sales activities. We also made tremendous strides this quarter in building our new management team, with the addition of key executives with proven track records who will drive our sales, licensing and operations."

Growth in net product sales for the third quarter 2005 resulted from higher domestic demand for the Company's firearms. The Model 500 revolver continued to deliver increased sales numbers, the result of a successful launch of the new 4" barrel product in 2004. The Company's 1911 line of pistols benefited from the formal launch and extensive media coverage of three new pistol additions introduced at the January 2005 SHOT Show in Las Vegas. Non-firearm sales for the third quarter 2005 posted a year-over-year decline of $1.6 million, due primarily to the Company's decision to discontinue its unprofitable optics product line in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The increase in net product sales for the nine months ended January 31, 2005 reflected the increased demand for the Company's firearms. Non-firearm sales decreased by $4.7 million over the nine months ended January 31, 2004, driven by reduced handcuff sales and discontinued product lines which were included in the sales for the prior year.

Improvement in the net loss for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 over the third quarter of fiscal 2004 was attributable to higher sales and reduced operating expenses. Operating expenses for the third quarter of fiscal 2004 were impacted by a number of one-time charges, including the discontinuation of two product lines, one-time restructuring costs of $1.0 million, and legal and professional fees associated with the restatement of prior period financial statements.

John Kelly, Chief Financial Officer, said, "In addition to growing our revenue, we dramatically strengthened our balance sheet this quarter through refinancing activities. As a result, we reduced our total debt by $21.3 million and improved our debt-to-equity ratio from its April 2004 level of 2.5 to 1 to its current level of .8 to 1. In conjunction with the refinancing, we obtained a revolving credit line, which is available for immediate use, as well as a capital expenditure credit line, which will be available to us in fiscal 2006. These resources will provide us with access to capital as we continue to grow our business."

Gross margin for the three months ended January 31, 2005 was $7.7 million, or 24.5%, a slight decrease from the comparable quarter in fiscal 2004. The shift to a seven-day workweek to meet increasing demand resulted in additional labor and training costs, which impacted gross margins for the quarter. In addition, increased consulting expenses for the Company's Lean Six Sigma efforts and increased medical costs both contributed to lower margins. The Lean Six Sigma program will now be driven internally, and the Company therefore expects that costs for that program will decline.

Outlook for the Full Year 2005

The Company currently expects net product sales for the year ending April 30, 2005 to increase by approximately 3% to 6% over the $117.9 million reported for the year ended April 30, 2004. Firearms sales for 2005 are expected to increase by about 9% over fiscal 2004 levels. The Company expects net income for the year ending April 30, 2005 to be between $5.1 and $5.9 million, or $.14 and $.17 per fully diluted share, compared with $1.4 million, or $.04 per fully diluted share, for the year ended April 30, 2004.

About Smith & Wesson

Smith & Wesson Holding Corp., through its subsidiary Smith & Wesson Corp., is one of the world's largest manufacturers of quality handguns, law enforcement products and firearm safety/security products. The Company also provides shooter protection, knives, apparel, footwear and other accessory lines. The Company is based in Springfield, Mass., with manufacturing facilities in Springfield and Houlton, Maine. The Smith & Wesson Academy is America's longest-running firearms training facility for America's public servants. For more information, call (800) 331-0852 or log on to www.smith-wesson.com.

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050308/latu115_1.html
 
They would be doing even better if they made revolvers like they did in the past.
 
Yep. They won't be earning my business with the nipple lock eyesore and other manufacturing sins.

My question--who is buying the current products?
 
Well, I just bought a new .500. Lock is ugly but in all fairness I was pleased and surprised by the overall quality and particuarly by the trigger. Its not as nice as my 29-2, but it's a hell of a lot better then the GP100 I just bought. OTOH, the Taurus tracker I also bought recently has just as nice a trigger as the Smith, and the overall finish is quite nice as well. Although the Smith is a nice gun, for the value I have to go with Taurus. If they had not shortened the cylinder on their proposed Raging Bull in .500 I might have waited until it came out.
 
While there's a couple of things I would prefer not to see on some of the S&W revolvers, and a couple of models I'd like to see brought back ... for the most part the new revolvers that come through our range seem to do just fine when fired ... unlike some of the revolvers sold by them during the 80's ...

As far as Taurus revolvers go, they do seem to offer a nice finish, but looks can only be skin-deep, as they say ...

I watched a fellow shooting his new short-barreled 5-shot .45 Colt Taurus the other day, with the ported barrel and the soft grips. He was doing okay with it, although it bothered him that the cylinder started to drag in less than a box of LSWC ammunition. The rear of the barrel exhibited some bright shiny marks that could be drag marks ... but it's his gun, and it's brand new, and he can have Taurus work on it if that bothers him ...

I watched our revolver (S&W and Colt) armorer have to 'straighten' the ejector rod on another guy's NIB Taurus .44 Magnum a few years back, and after examining the inner workings of the revolver for the fellow, he suggested it be 'carried a lot, but fired a little' ...

Since some state's laws are driving the internal locking mechanisms, it's likely they'll remain with us. I'll say one thing, though, I'd rather have the S&W design lock, than that 'wart' looking right back at me from the Taurus hammer, for both appearance and operation.

I'm still not keen on the S&W's sleeved barrels, though, but that might just be more of a knee-jerk reaction on my part.

Now, if they'd only make a Scandium framed 642, instead of the standard aluminum J-frame, while retaining the stainless cylinder. I'm not too keen on titanium cylinders either.
 
Last edited:
My question--who is buying the current products?
Law Enforcement + the tons of gunowners who don't surf the web,and who know only the Smith and Wesson name,and not the assorted baggage that goes with it: sometimes spotty revolver and pistol quality and a contract made with the Clinton administration that was never rescinded publicly by the subsequent owners.
Gunowners online can make a lot of noise, but in the end, our numbers don't have much impact. We're a vocal minority in the general gunowning public.
 
He was playing with his gun??
Wow.
Even I play with my guns but I make sure they're not loaded first, and I STILL exert safety.
 
Old Smith & Wessons, yes. New Smith & Wessons, no: not as long as the company's agreement with the Snopes Clinton-Liar Gore régime is still in place, and not until I can buy guns without locks.
 
I ordered that right hand shooting glove from them a few days ago. ( I only own rugers as of yet) I should be getting it soon I hope. :uhoh:
 
I just bought a S&W 500 mag. (my first S&W )and it seems to be a quality gun, although I
have not fired it yet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top