rbernie
Contributing Member
That's one view.It's become apparent that useful and knowledgeable experience regarding the M&P that dosen't conform to the preconcieved beliefs on this thread aren't wanted, and of course that means nothing's to be gained by hanging around.............................................................
My view is that you made claims that were refuted by others direct experiences. If you choose to internalize that - that's YOUR choice. That was not forced upon you.
I have four (4) M&Ps in 40S&W. The lowest-use one has about 600 rounds through it. The highest-use one has seen about 4000 rounds through it. I have suffered not a single breakage, and the only unexpected stoppages that have occured resulted from my handloading a truncated-cone bullet with a wide metaplat; this bullet profile will occasionally hang up on the feed ramp. All commercial ammo, FMJ and HP, has worked flawlessly.
Accuracy has been good, and build quality is uniformly high. The pistol makes heavy use of stamped steel parts, but does not seem to suffer for that. Magazines are a bit pricey @ $30/ea, but that's no worse than most.
I do not find the presence of the internal take-down lever to be an annoyance, but others might. It adds about 12 seconds to the field strip process. <shrug> I've not tried pulling the trigger to take down the pistol; I prefer not to do that.
The sights are useable, and the ergonomics in general are superior (and more tailorable) than most any other polymer striker-fired pistol on the market. So far, S&W customer support has been very accomodating WRT issues or concerns - they really seem to be trying to please their intended market. The pistol is not perfect, but then again you don't have to deal with the 'but it's perfection' attitude when an issue arises.
Oh, and a quick inspection shows that the M&P does a better job of supporting the case head of a 40S&W round than does a Glock 22/23.
Last edited: