Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Smith & Wesson Model 14 .22lr? What The Heck.

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Phydeaux642, Jul 3, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Phydeaux642

    Phydeaux642 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
    I was talking to a customer in the store where I work yesterday and he was showing me some pictures of some guns that he was trying to sell. One of the pictures was of a model 14 in .22lr. Never heard of one in .22lr. So, I looked in the Smith & Wesson Standard Catalog. Well, no mention of it there either.

    Has anyone heard of a model 14 in .22lr? Could he have a model 14 that was re-barreled with a .22 barrel and .22 cylinder? Or, is that even possible?
     
  2. Wil Terry

    Wil Terry Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,129
    Location:
    Black Hills, South Dakota, USA
    NO !! It is a frame that was mis-marked model 14 instead of the correct model 17. The ignition systems of the two frames are totally different.
     
  3. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,327
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    I think your customer is mistaken, it's probably a model 17. While it is physically possible to convert a centerfire revolver to a rimfire, it would be rather silly given the abundant K-22's already on the market. Although Jim Stroh builds a nifty little 617 with a relined model 66 barrel for something the factory never made. He still uses a rimfire frame.
     
  4. Phydeaux642

    Phydeaux642 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
    It's certainly a possibility that he's mistaken. He's a long time gun guy, but that is probably the answer that makes the most sense. He's wanting $395 for it, but there is a lot of the blue that is wore off.
     
  5. Lucky Derby

    Lucky Derby Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    2,145
    Location:
    Colorado Rockies
    Mismarked M17.
    Mismarked S&W's while not exactly common, are not really that hard to come by either.
    I have a friend with a nickel 8 3/8" .44 Magnum M19-3:eek:
     
  6. JWJacobVT

    JWJacobVT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    Messages:
    303
    Location:
    Vermont
    Or model 18
     
  7. Phydeaux642

    Phydeaux642 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
    It had a 6" barrel.
     
  8. SaxonPig

    SaxonPig Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,787
    Either the customer misspoke and it's a Model 17 or the frame is mismarked 14 instead of 17 (and this happens a lot more than some people think).
     
  9. Phydeaux642

    Phydeaux642 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
    I'll have to ask him when I see him. He had pictures with a description of the gun printed under the pictures. He had it down as a Model 14 Combat Masterpiece. The more that I think about it, the more that I think it is marked incorrectly.
     
  10. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    The third possibility is, he needs an eye check-up.

    rc
     
  11. Jim K

    Jim K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    17,754
    I somehow think that gun owners make mistakes more often than S&W does.

    FWIW, I am an "oldie" who still has problems with S&W's model numbers, so I sympathize. I know that the K-22 became the Model 17 and that a Model 14 is really a K-38. But the other day I couldn't remember what a Model 64 was without looking it up (it's the stainless version of the Model 10, M&P).

    Jim
     
  12. JWJacobVT

    JWJacobVT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    Messages:
    303
    Location:
    Vermont
    Yup if it had a 6 inch barrel it would be a M17. Anyway how much was he asking? Love K-22s.
     
  13. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    22,855
    I am with Jim K.
    Before 1958, S&W Hand Ejectors had names, not numbers.
    J. Caesar would not tell you he was born in 100 BC and I do not call my Combat Masterpiece .22 a "pre-18."
     
  14. Phydeaux642

    Phydeaux642 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
    He's asking $395. From the picture it looks like there is a lot of wear. That doesn't mean it's not a good shooter, though.
     
  15. SaxonPig

    SaxonPig Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,787
    A 4" barrel makes it a Combat Masterpiece or Model 18 after 1957.


    standard.jpg
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page