Zak Smith
Member
When confronted with the whole "tactical" question (in this case "sniper"), I prefer to describe the shooting-focused activities as "practical". For long-range, we run "practical long-range" shooting matches, not sniper or tactical matches.
That said, if a rifle was designed for sniper use and is sold to military and law-enforcement for that purpose, it seems genuine to call it a sniper rifle. After all, an F1 race car does not cease to be a race car if it's parked on display instead of on the track with a race-car driver at the wheel.
-z
ETA:
Nightcrawler, you might check if Michaelis' book discusses down-range energy. I know he talked alot about anti-materiel; not sure if he discusses anti-personnel.
That said, if a rifle was designed for sniper use and is sold to military and law-enforcement for that purpose, it seems genuine to call it a sniper rifle. After all, an F1 race car does not cease to be a race car if it's parked on display instead of on the track with a race-car driver at the wheel.
-z
ETA:
Nightcrawler, you might check if Michaelis' book discusses down-range energy. I know he talked alot about anti-materiel; not sure if he discusses anti-personnel.