upptick
Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2020
- Messages
- 281
I also note that smaller organizations who abandon SIG's universally step backward and adopt a 35 year old auto pistol which isn't known to be advancing design progress, which is the precise issue here. Yet, that is exactly where they were in their early days, soundly chastised for innovation by the moribund pistol industry who was losing all the contracts. They are now acting like their competition did then, which signals how stale the company has become.
You mean returning to an "old fashioned" DA/SA design, like a Beretta or HK? You really think that is a "step backward?" To me, that would seem more like a lateral shift at worst and perhaps is just a better option because of the lower probability of having an accidental discharge with a regular hammer-fired gun.
And as to newer always being better, I definitely disagree with that. My new Honda Pilot has all these automatic safety features which scared the hell out of me when I first got it when it threw the brakes on while I was on the highway. I was driving on a curve in traffic and the radar apparently saw a car ahead in an adjacent lane and the system perceived that I was on a collision course so it activated the brakes, which nearly caused the car behind me to rear-end me. I deactivated that crazy feature as soon as I figured out how, which itself was not a trivial undertaking. In other words, for concealed carry I like my HK p2000sk more than my Glock....