One of my shooting buds got one a few months ago. Today I happened to hit his town in the morning and paid him a visit, bought him a cup of coffee and then we went upstairs to his reloading room where he has his reloading set-up.
This guy was a total reloading newbie and his English is poor. There are a few (but useful) reloading tutorials on Youtube on how to properly set up and run a LM but he has watched none of them. He's an intelligent man but it's not what we'd call a "mechanically inclined" person. He uses a four die set-up with station 1 dedicated to depriming and resizing. Station 2 is just for priming, 3 for flaring and charging, 4 is bullet seating, 5 is crimping and post-sizing (Carbide FCD). I told him about the convenience of using a decapping-only die in station 1 and leaving 2 with a sizer sans the decapping pin. He hadn't ever heard of it but agreed it sounded like a good idea and said he was to order a decapper and do it that way.
Even though this one is his first press, he has understood it pretty well, IMHO. And even though it was my first time with this press, I could tell it could take advantage from the benefits of some lubrication. The press certainly felt a bit rough in its function, it's not the smooth, pleasant feel of a Dillon 650 but, hey... it's half the price . So I put hands to the task and in a few minutes I had loaded 50 rounds flawlessly. Not a single priming problem (all nicely seated below flush) and on checking OAL, all rounds were within .005" which I consider an acceptable tolerance. Looks like the press has the new priming system but this guy hasn't followed any of the tutorials that recommend lubrication and sanding here and there. Indexing was fine, so was the case feeding system.
All in all... I have read several, lots of opinions and reviews on different presses and on this particular one, there seem to be two different streams of opinions. One states it's junk and you're better off using it for target practice (more or less), another one that says that if properly set, it runs well. I think the latter are right, honestly.
Surely, a bit of sanding on the shell plate and other contact areas will help it run smoother, but I have to admit it, it has surprised me. I expected it to run worse. I had almost disregarded it in my search for a progressive, but now it's in the pole position.
This guy was a total reloading newbie and his English is poor. There are a few (but useful) reloading tutorials on Youtube on how to properly set up and run a LM but he has watched none of them. He's an intelligent man but it's not what we'd call a "mechanically inclined" person. He uses a four die set-up with station 1 dedicated to depriming and resizing. Station 2 is just for priming, 3 for flaring and charging, 4 is bullet seating, 5 is crimping and post-sizing (Carbide FCD). I told him about the convenience of using a decapping-only die in station 1 and leaving 2 with a sizer sans the decapping pin. He hadn't ever heard of it but agreed it sounded like a good idea and said he was to order a decapper and do it that way.
Even though this one is his first press, he has understood it pretty well, IMHO. And even though it was my first time with this press, I could tell it could take advantage from the benefits of some lubrication. The press certainly felt a bit rough in its function, it's not the smooth, pleasant feel of a Dillon 650 but, hey... it's half the price . So I put hands to the task and in a few minutes I had loaded 50 rounds flawlessly. Not a single priming problem (all nicely seated below flush) and on checking OAL, all rounds were within .005" which I consider an acceptable tolerance. Looks like the press has the new priming system but this guy hasn't followed any of the tutorials that recommend lubrication and sanding here and there. Indexing was fine, so was the case feeding system.
All in all... I have read several, lots of opinions and reviews on different presses and on this particular one, there seem to be two different streams of opinions. One states it's junk and you're better off using it for target practice (more or less), another one that says that if properly set, it runs well. I think the latter are right, honestly.
Surely, a bit of sanding on the shell plate and other contact areas will help it run smoother, but I have to admit it, it has surprised me. I expected it to run worse. I had almost disregarded it in my search for a progressive, but now it's in the pole position.
Last edited: