Logos
member
So.......was it really a dangerous crack?
Or a harmless mark?
I just read the whole thread and there's no answer.
Did they replace the cylinder because it was dangerous or just because the look of it would scare people?
I suppose we'll never know. They wouldn't voluntarily admit that they sent out a defective cylinder.
Or a harmless mark?
I just read the whole thread and there's no answer.
Did they replace the cylinder because it was dangerous or just because the look of it would scare people?
I suppose we'll never know. They wouldn't voluntarily admit that they sent out a defective cylinder.