Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

So have to vent about the new S&W.

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Mr.454, Jan 28, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Mr.454

    Mr.454 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Messages:
    186
    Location:
    Northwest Ohio
    So finally got the 627PC, and have been using the snap caps quite a bit. And noticed there is a nice big burr on the front of the barrel. It looks like someone was cutting the barrel with a band saw and didn't finish the cut leaving a lip. On the in rear of the barrel by the cylinder there is another burr.http://www.thehighroad.org/images/smilies/banghead.gif And I noticed tool marks on the back of the hammer, not to mention if you fire it and hold the hammer down it opens up a gap between the hammer and frame about .013. Now for the real pisser on the side of the barrel with the burr the cylinder gap is .012, and on the other side is .008. What crap I have a 686+ next to me that cost not even half as much with much better finish.
     
  2. StrawHat

    StrawHat Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2007
    Messages:
    3,623
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    What did S&W say when you contacted them about the issues?
     
  3. ROBBY.1911

    ROBBY.1911 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Messages:
    225
    i used to own a 686-7 PC in .38 super. i truly got one of the first as the serial number ended in #009. after a short time i noticed that the cylinder stop notches were kicking up some metal on every cylinder. i called S&W and the said send it in. it happened a second time and got sent in. that's when they accused me of sitting around day and night dry firing the gun. i got so pissed off i told them to take the gun back they finally replaced the cylinder and the gun worked from ther on in. you gotta stay on them..
     
  4. jglcolosprgs

    jglcolosprgs Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    201
    I'm amazed at how many people accept a "new" gun out of the box without even looking at it. Even if it was a mail order bride, I sure would have inspected it on receipt and sent it back to the seller right then and there. I field strip autos, I visually inspect everything. I play "dumb" and have the sales guy take them apart for me and "show" me how to reassemble.

    I've handed back a number of guns to a dealer and pointed out problems. I got burned by Smith & Wesson and learned my lesson.
     
  5. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    24,953
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    Yeah, but remember, Taurus sux.....:rolleyes:

    Yeah, any time I buy a revolver I check it out thoroughly and I really prefer buying USED revolvers, especially Smiths, especially OLDER Smiths. I've got some great TAURUS and Smith used guns. New, well, just check 'em out just as you would a used one. That'll weed out 99 percent of the problems. Gotta look real close.
     
  6. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    24,953
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
  7. MrBorland

    MrBorland Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2007
    Messages:
    4,263
    Location:
    NC
    Modern CNC production can make great guns. Unfortunately, when a machine gets out of whack, it seems their process isn't very good at catching and fixing those guns before they go out. Fortunately, I hear mostly very good things about their CS. My experience with S&W CS has been very good.

    Good luck to you.
     
  8. Sniper X

    Sniper X Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,635
    Location:
    New Mexico
    AMEN MC Gunner! My sentiments exactly! Not only that, but I'll ad that lately the Taurus revolvers I have looked at lately, have looked and felt better than the current crop of Smith's! In fact, I have a 10-8 and loked at a brand new 10-14 in the gun store last month, it felt like a cheap copy of my 10-8! And the bluing was substandard especially for S&W.....I was very disappointed, especially with the trigger, which compared to mine, felt more like it should have been on a RG instead of a S&W.
     
  9. roaddog28

    roaddog28 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    632
    Location:
    Escondido, CA
    Hi,
    Anytime a person buys a handgun new or used they need to check the revolver out thoroughly before they buy it. That is why I don't buy handguns on the internet. I don't even buy cars or trucks too on the internet. I want to see the merchandise and check it out first before I spend my hard earn cash.
    With that said, I am not surprise about your 627PC. The quality of new S&W revolvers nowadays is for me poor. I have handled a few new S&W revolvers from a 686P, 686ssr and a 620. All of them were poorly finished, had very heavy trigger pulls and just were not worth the asking price. I just bought a L frame back in late November. I wanted either 686, 620 or a 686ssr. The reason. Too compete in IDPA. After trying all of the above I decided to buy a 686-2 4 inch. This revolver has a much better trigger pull and is finished much better that the news ones I was considering. I paid $400 for the revolver. The new ones would have cost me from $800 to $900. This is in sane to pay for a new revolver when a person can get a better made used one for half the cost. Mr 454 I hope everything works out for you,
    Howard
    My 686-2 4 inch

    [​IMG]
     
  10. nofishbob

    nofishbob Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    395
    Location:
    Copper Canyon, TX
    I have a new performance Center revolver back at S&W right now to correct a bunch of assembly blunders.

    Nobody at S&W seems to even look at these guns before they ship them.

    My lower priced Rugers and Glocks all had much better (nearly perfect) fit and finish right out of the box than my new high dollar "Performance Center" S&W.

    Once stupid, twice a fool.

    Bob
     
  11. Mr.454

    Mr.454 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Messages:
    186
    Location:
    Northwest Ohio
    I didn't get a chance to check it out because it was a gift, but as soon as it was given to me I noticed the burrs at once. What could I say good job dear? So I figured I'd just get some Flitz, and some lapping compound and fix the blemishes myself. But why the heck should I on a gun that cost over 1K so on a lark I figured if they didn't care about QC I should check the cylinder gap. Lets say that the cylinder gap I can't deal with, that has to be fixed. My experience with S&W CS was not as good as Taurus. The person I spoke to had no interest in what was wrong he just wanted to get FedEx to me and get off the phone.
     
  12. Thaddeus Jones

    Thaddeus Jones Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,006
    Welcome to the current company calling itself S&W!

    Hopefully their stock will continue to tank, and they will be purchased by a gun company. :)
     
  13. Nomad

    Nomad Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2010
    Messages:
    268
    I hate to put down S&W as I have many of the older models which I will not part with. However, I bought a S&W 317 a couple of years ago as a survival tool for my line of work which occassionally takes me into remote areas. It shot like crap. The best I could get it to do was 2" at 10 yrds with trying all sorts of ammo brands. I sent it back to S&W on their dime and it came back shooting the same with no information on what if anything was done. I called a rep and he said ship it back so I did. The second trip back I called to follow up before they shipped it back. They told me it was shooting in spec so I asked what spec was. They told me 3" at 10 yds. I couldn't believe it for a $500 plus gun. It was advertised on their web-site in part as a target gun. Crap I can shoot a slingshot almost that good. I sold it and took a bit of a loss and am trying to avoid new S&Ws going forward.
     
  14. SPW1

    SPW1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2009
    Messages:
    125
    Isn't that the truth. Frankly there is no reason why a perfectly average revolver shouldn't be able to shoot groups of no more than two to two and a half inches at 25 yards. If a revolver will not do at least that well there is likely something wrong with it. That isn't a hard level of accuracy to reach and a lot of production guns will do quite a bit better. I hate to think how poorly a revolver would have to be made to be capable of no better than 3 inch groups at ten yards. Even the cheapest and most poorly built revolvers you come across will usually be able to "group"(or should I say pattern) at least that well. Three inches at ten yards is certainly a pretty pitiful "standard" for a company that produces rather expensive revolvers to hold themselves to.
     
  15. jad0110

    jad0110 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,027
    Location:
    Somewhere between the Eastern Block states and Flo
    Yep, it does appear that not enough QC of the CNC machines themselves is performed. We have lots of such machines in an industrial setting I work to support, and a well oiled QC system of those machines is absolutely critical.

    I've only purchased 2 NIB S&Ws, and both (particularly the 686) were perfectly fitted and asembled, if rough in the finishing department.
     
  16. dewalt-2

    dewalt-2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2009
    Messages:
    210
    My 686-6 4" was good to go out of the box-no obvious flaws and mechanically perfect in function-zero end shake and tight cylinder lock up, although a little stiff in DA. I gave it a good going over at the shop when I bought it. As I do with all new guns, I detail stripped it the minute I got it home. I was surprised to find it completely dry inside, no assembly lube at all. Also, internals were roughly finished with lots of ragged edges and unpolished machining. After about 6 hours of meticulous stoning and polishing it went back together(without the IL)-what a difference. DA was much smoother and lighter, and SA came in at an average of 2.4# with no creep.
    Although the gun was perfectly functional as purchased, it could have been much more refined with a little effort at the factory.
    By the way, it did shoot POA at 50', no complaints there.
    I spiffed her up a bit...
    [​IMG]
     
  17. StrawHat

    StrawHat Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2007
    Messages:
    3,623
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    Not unbelieveable, what is unbelieveable is how many $$$ 6 hours of hand work would add to the factory price. It would put them out of business.
     
  18. Jim K

    Jim K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    17,566
    With all the "I'll never buy another ...." posts, it sometimes seems that the gun community is more eager to put gun companies out of business than the Brady gang.

    I also wonder how many of the "I demand absolute perfection" folks are themselves perfect. Of course I don't want to meet them - I suspect absolute perfectionists are absolutely insufferable.

    Jim
     
  19. SWAddict

    SWAddict Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2009
    Messages:
    40
    I don't think the gun community wants to put gun companies out of business. We just want the hard-earned money that we pay for guns to go to buying a quality gun that does not need any fine-tuning or a trip back to factory to correct problems that should not have made it past a final QC check. S&W's older guns very rarely had problems like modern S&W's. It seems like in the past few years, the number of S&W guns that need to have factory problems corrected is very high.

    As for demanding perfection, there is nothing wrong with an imperfect person demanding perfection from a company when it is that imperfect person's money paying for a product which was promised by the company to be of the highest quality. But what many people are demanding is a basic level of quality from S&W. S&W seems to more and more have sub-standard quality.

    I myself have had several modern era S&W's that have left the factory with issues. I had a 625JM that had cylinder notch which had metal peening and this caused the gun to skip a cylinder when shooting in double action. I had S&W fix it and then I sold it. I have a 627Pro that the front of the barrel was not cut perpendicular to the bore of the barrel; it has a 3-5 degree angle to it. I kept it as it does shoot good but this should not have made it out of the factory. I purchased another 625JM that has a different barrel-to-cylinder gap depending on which side of the gun you do the measurement. These are the only modern era S&W's that I currently have. I have owned others but sold them. And ALL of these modern era guns, required me to completely disassemble them to clean out metal shavings and lubricate them.
     
  20. Thaddeus Jones

    Thaddeus Jones Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,006
    Well said S&WAddict ! :)

    Those who excuse their favorite manufacturer, and encourage us to accept less while paying more, are responsible for the sorry crap with famous trademarks we are saddled with.

    Junk is junk, nomatter the country it was produced in.

    If folks would not buy this junk, the manufacturers would stop trying to foist it on the rest of us. TJ
     
  21. NMGonzo

    NMGonzo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,691
    Location:
    Albuquerque & Santa Fe
    send it back to get it right

    all companies eventually do that
     
  22. bflobill_69

    bflobill_69 Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2008
    Messages:
    305
    Location:
    Northcentral, AZ
    Yeah I the newest gun I own is about 25 years old... and as you would guess its arguably the worst crafted. Find a nice OLD one someone has loved and treated with the respect it deserves!

    Old guns keep my young at heart,

    Buffalo Bill in NC AZ
     
  23. ExMachina

    ExMachina Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2003
    Messages:
    391
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    Don't fret. You're NOT alone :(

    My brand new S&W 22-4 came with a host of issues. I only detected one of them before I bought the gun, but have since found at least 4 more...and I still haven't gotten around to test firing it :what:

    So, this one will be going back to S&W. Here's hoping that the make things right for the both of us!
     
  24. Mr.454

    Mr.454 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Messages:
    186
    Location:
    Northwest Ohio
    Contacted S&W last week and still waiting for that magical shipping label, getting fed up. For all the complaining I've heard over the years about Taurus they actually take care of people. I call them and FedEx is at my door the next day. Call Smith and no one really seems to care about the problem. And this isn't about being a perfectionist this gun cost as much as both my Raging bull 44, and my PT92 combined it should look good and perform.
     
  25. Rxster

    Rxster Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    59
    Location:
    PC Florida
    You are not alone. I just bought one and it had the same burr on the muzzle. Would have never saw it (I never look at the muzzle for some reason), but did after seeing your post. It is on the way back to S&W as well.
    No excuse for it to happen on a PC gun. We all make mistakes, it is how they handle the issue that will make or break it for me.
    Keep us posted.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page