sappnasty
member
Your right I was trolling...so what? I got tired of posting things about my favorite rifle in my collection (at that time I wasn't trolling just happy about my purchase) and getting negative feedback from people that have probably never even held on, less shot one.
And as we all know, most people make "opinions" and probably have no first hand experience in the matter. AK103K, I don't get offended, and I love out conversations....I just like to prove a point
(Don't we all?). And again the point is is not "to impress" anyone.
Understand for the millionth time, I am not using it as a long range rifle...obviously if I even attempted to shoot at a CMP match with my Socom I would leave very embarrassed - That's a NO BRAINER DUH....But again, that's not what it is designed for...IT - IS - A - BATTLE - RIFLE....not a sniper rifle, it was designed for close range. And so the hell what if S/A designed it to appeal to tacti-gadget guys? If it's so terrible, then you wouldn't be afraid to stand in front of it at 500 yards then huh? That's what I thought.
So stop trying to compare it to other rifles that were designed for long range. My point of this thread was to simply say that the SOCOM II was not just some expensive "hundred yard" rifle at best. It is an M1A whether you like it or not..PERIOD.
Oh and I wasn't trying to hide the fact that I was "trolling"...that's exactly what I was doing. I proved to myself today that half of the members on here that bad mouth my baby have no freakin' idea what in the hell their talking about. My rifle is like my child..I love it and cherish it so..So is it so wrong for me to defend her at all costs? What kind of gun owner would I be if I did otherwise?
And as we all know, most people make "opinions" and probably have no first hand experience in the matter. AK103K, I don't get offended, and I love out conversations....I just like to prove a point
(Don't we all?). And again the point is is not "to impress" anyone. Understand for the millionth time, I am not using it as a long range rifle...obviously if I even attempted to shoot at a CMP match with my Socom I would leave very embarrassed - That's a NO BRAINER DUH....But again, that's not what it is designed for...IT - IS - A - BATTLE - RIFLE....not a sniper rifle, it was designed for close range. And so the hell what if S/A designed it to appeal to tacti-gadget guys? If it's so terrible, then you wouldn't be afraid to stand in front of it at 500 yards then huh? That's what I thought.
So stop trying to compare it to other rifles that were designed for long range. My point of this thread was to simply say that the SOCOM II was not just some expensive "hundred yard" rifle at best. It is an M1A whether you like it or not..PERIOD.
Oh and I wasn't trying to hide the fact that I was "trolling"...that's exactly what I was doing. I proved to myself today that half of the members on here that bad mouth my baby have no freakin' idea what in the hell their talking about. My rifle is like my child..I love it and cherish it so..So is it so wrong for me to defend her at all costs? What kind of gun owner would I be if I did otherwise?
