BB21, thanks for the note. I have been over at taurusarmed forum, and there are a couple posts there from lefties that have also been rather quiet.
I concur that a safety is a good feature on the new 3rd gen PT111s. Albeit long, the trigger is still SA. WHile a safety is only that - a "safety" - and not a "certainty", having that as a, well, safety device is important for me. If/when I get my CCL, I would carry it in a holster most of the time, but being able to drop it in a pants pocket for a quick run to the bank, store, or gas station across the street are all bonus. I wouldn't do that with a SA auto with no safety. (The other gun I'm considering is a 3" SP101, significantly heavier than the 9mm mil-pro). That's also why I don't want to go the PT911 (NOT 1911) route. I have a PT92 if I want full-size, large frame. I want something smaller.
I LOVE the XD9sc, but it's about $150 more around here. With it's passive safeties, I would feel OK doing an occassional pocket carry (yes, I know it is heavy). I don't like the little KelTeks. Haven't shot one, but they don't *feel* right. My theory is if it doesn't feel good, I won't carry it, etc... I like the RUger; no manual safety, either.
So, I'm window shopping. I appreciate the comments here and your patience.
Peace,
Q