Ironicaintit
Member
And for the record... I'm out of the SA-35 market. Turkish? Don't want it. Me and my rattley T series with a 30% finish and my battered "assembled in Portugal" mkIII are snooty like that
WVsig - This thread is unique in the skepticism being expressed about Springfield. On most other forums and youtube reviews most comments are gushing and giddy to the nth degree about this. They are declaring it the second coming and the revival of the greatest gun of all time, etc. They surely have bought it all hook line and sinker. You might be fine with a well done Turkish copy but I think these guys I am referring to have become emotionally attached to the notion of a US made Hi Power.
If you have proof of that I want to see it. Also The EAA Grisan version lacks some of the improvements in the SA. First the rollmarks suck donkey balls. Next the sights are garbage and you can only hope the dovetail will accept replacements. The thumb safety is not improved.
Ive been trying, unsuccessfully, to find any two reference points on the slide or frame that show a visually detectable dimensional difference. The hammer and trigger are slightly different profiles, but I think any perceived difference in the major parts may be an illusion caused by the different surface finishes.
Are these the purist garbage parts you speak of? Look an awful lot like the Girsan parts.
View attachment 1034765
View attachment 1034766
I wish you the best of luck in dropping the value of your collection in order to add to it. My post was in reference to what looks to be a rather faithful reproduction of the HiPower at a price affordable by shooters who don’t already own a safe full of customs with an attitude.
The Tisas got pretty good reviews from knowledgeable hi power people when it was briefly introduced awhile ago as an “honest” Turk clone. The consensus seemed to be that a couple of non-FN-spec pins needed to be replaced by a smith for optimum reliability and after that it should be good to go.
They are not junk, just like the RIA 1911s are not junk. Are they what everyone wants? No. Otherwise we’d all be buying the Canik guns and Glock, FN, et al. would go out of business. Some people prize a more elegant finish, and a name, with real heritage. These things cost money. Some people also don’t care for SAI’s anti gun political chicanery or rebranding of foreign guns under the very historic Springfield Armory name.
I think the SAI hi power has a real promise and place in the market. It seems to be a well made gun in a desirable design, at a good price. And some people will be happy it says Springfield on the slide, while others will not.
For my part I wish it said “made in Brazil” because I think their girls are prettier and I’m an anti-Turkish bigot. But that won’t stop me from buying one once supply and prices stabilize and any kinks get worked out.
Right some of them are stock guns. Those two examples are stock. One is a fixed sight Practical. The other is a hard chromed MKII. What you clearly have no knowledge of the custom BHP world or really the BHP world in general. Let me give you a shovel so you can continue to dig a your hole of ignorance. These are also in that pic.
You clearly are a troll. How many BHPs do you own? What is your round count on the platform. What personal experience with BHPs sets you up as someone who can meaningfully comment on these guns? Do you even own one?
Yost
View attachment 1034769
Williams
View attachment 1034770
Cogan
View attachment 1034771
West
View attachment 1034772
Garthwaite
View attachment 1034773
Williams
View attachment 1034774
My point was and is that people who are deep into BHPs will still want FN guns. They might buy a SA or other clone but they covet FN gun for a reason. They simply run. They are the original and with a little help are great shooters. Oh and yes those are 12 of my FN manufactured BHPs. Just a part of the collection. I can guarantee that the new offerings will not effect their value.
You attacked my post as baseless when all evidence points to a connection. Then you attacked Girsan’s choice of safety and sights. Then you called me an ignorant fool. Then you posted pictures of your collection of BHPs with the same style parts as the Girsan; parts you called, and I am quoting: “garbage”. Then you determined I was blissfully unaware of anything related to the platform. If you fail to find irony in that... I’m not saying SA’s changes aren’t an improvement, only that a “purist” as you called them would surely scoff at any change.
All of this over a comment I made about the Girsan and Springfield being “twins” (meaning born in the same place). And you have the nerve to call others snippy. Just wow. This is why I rarely post anything in the handgun forum.
Colt guys are the same. They are not buying a pistol, they are buying a legend. The legends are in their heads. A pistol don't know no legend.
If the FN pistols run, and you have a lot of confidence in their function and durability, well pay more, because you will probably get what you are looking for. However I have gotten very unromantic about firearms, if they perform well on target, that is what I want. If they are 100% reliable, then that is what I want. If it has features I want, then that is what I want. There are no friendly ghosts that come with a firearm, no feng shui imparted due to its manufacturing location. Firearms are mechanical pieces that are what they are.
I also don't believe that gluing a clump of red string on top of a rock, and painting it pink, makes it a girl rock. Nor do I believe gluing a tiny cowboy hat and painting it blue, makes it a boy rock. Some do.
View attachment 1034527
The Girsan ad. Notice the similarities to the Springfield ad.
i believe that is a photoshop joke. I doubt that suit will go anywhere.
It might be a tell that Grisan is not the source of the raw forgings.
The legends are in their heads. A pistol don't know no legend.
If the FN pistols run, and you have a lot of confidence in their function and durability, well pay more, because you will probably get what you are looking for. However I have gotten very unromantic about firearms, if they perform well on target, that is what I want. If they are 100% reliable, then that is what I want. If it has features I want, then that is what I want. There are no friendly ghosts that come with a firearm, no feng shui imparted due to its manufacturing location. Firearms are mechanical pieces that are what they are.
That's the thing. FN BHPs have proven their reliability and durability for 86 year. There is no clone out there that can make the same claim. FN produced the BHP longer than any other clone maker that came for them reliability and quality IMHO was the reason.
It's OK, kids. You can like them or hate them, but time will tell if they work well or not. It is great to have options, especially when backed by a US company. They will fly or die on the basis of their own performance and support. Your values, your decisions, have it your way!
That is very interesting. Wonder how it will turn out?