got a Budapest M.95
Found a decent deal at Big 5 Sporting goods, they sell Century Arms Milsurps at pretty good prices. The local dealers and gunshows wanted $195 to $215 for a Steyr-made M95 Stutzen...sorry, I can't find the umlaut on my keyboard...
Big 5 had them on sale for $119, and I picked out a good looking one with strong rifling, if a darkish bore. Time and thorough cleaning will tell how much is lead and copper and how much is actual erosion of the steel, but no serious pitting visible. The serials are pretty much all force-matched an most I've looked at (grind the old one off and strike in the new one...some I saw had this on the receiver to match the barrel, most had it on the bolt to match the receiver and on smaller parts as well.). The barrel and receiver on mine don't appear to be force-matched, the serials look original. The bolt looked like it could have been ground and renumberd two or three times, even, but there wasn't much wear on the bolt at any point.
The stock on mine showed no indication of rifle swivels on the underside or repairs of any kind, but had two earlier serial numbers above the current one...many I've looked at had fillers in the old swivel hole on the bottom of the buttstock...maybe this one was originally a carbine stock? Decent wood, only a few minor dings, arsenal re-blued (I looked at more than one that had been stripped to white and not reblued) minimal or no visible wear on the bolt and trigger contact points (arsenal rework was not obvious except for forcematching the serial on the bolt).
Instead of Steyr, the Austrian arsenal, my receiver was labelled Budapest, the Hungarian arsenal of the Austro-Hungarian empire...same design. No other indicators of history or provenance, other than the S-patronen stamp. Where Steyrs are stamped W-n for Vienna, and two-digit year of acceptance, this one looks like it's stamped Bu--st and either 08 or 18...hard to read.
Budapests apparently accounted for 35-40% of M95's...anyone have a feel for whether they are as well made as the Steyrs? Frankly it doesn't look like a gun made in the throes of desparate wartime production...very well finished on all the parts I've seen so far. I've seen a lot of toolmarks in my 1943 Enfield and Garand, but possibly on the M95 they were smoothed away in one or more arsenal rebuilds.