You're probably right. I think it will work for optics, but irons will probably be an issue unless I keep the range the same (and, centerfires not being as limited in range as rimfires, I'd rather not set the limits that tightly), so a new target is in order. Honestly I wonder if there would be much interest in a iron sight division at any distance (perhaps it might be best to start with only one division, but retain a sporting and target class, and see if participation warrants a split in a later match, assuming it does well enough to give it another go)?Mav: as somebody who spends too much time on THR, I'd like to see a centerfire match. I just have a hard time seeing how the rimfire targets could translate into centerfire ones sometimes.
Maverick223 said:1858, thought you were going to put the new 5-25x56mm PRH on the AIAW?
kis2 said:1858: That is awesome! A .4moa 7-shot group, thats almost halfway to the f-class string you'll need! best of luck at the competition.
Thanks for the input, we'll put one together for next month (might even start a week or two early to get a good start).With the number of optics out there on semi autos and the fact that a lot of bolt actions aren't even made with iron sights anymore, I don't think it'd be entirely unjust to try just an optics division at first. So I think your plan works.
That's probably the one I was thinking of...should have noticed that the one pictured was a short action (.308Win.). I wouldn't mind a AW for my next LRPR, but I have decided on the .260Rem., which would cost me a good chunk of change extra to get built in an AI...still might do it, but it pushes me over my planned budget by a bit (was shooting for sub-$4k less optics/accessories).I plan to put it on an AI AWM when it gets here.